The
whole point of science at a young age is to make observations and gain experiences that they can use later on.
Whether you're foggy on the concept of «epigenetics» or just want to recap the high
points of the science of genetics, check out Eissenberg's overview of some of the most exciting advances in the last 50 years: Discoveries in DNA: What's New Since You Went to High School?
The standard was lowered not by any
real point of science but because the standard was lowered because the ability to judge moral issues was given up by the APA.The Bible standard was also given up, so now you essentially have no standard just a set of laws telling people you can or cant do.
Indeed some science philosophers think the whole
point of the science process is about finding theories and then finding data (results or observations) that could potentially falsify the theory.
But given the uncertainties involved in climate change, the widespread and heartfelt mistrust of the research backing it, and the IPCC's delicate role at the
crossing point of science and politics, many reckon that the communications chief will face a difficult task.
We can say that the observer is the
starting point of science in general; its origin up to now has not been searched in details, theoretically and experientially.
«The standard was lowered not by any
real point of science but because the standard was lowered because the ability to judge moral issues was given up by the APA»
You appear to understand all the
finer points of the science, but you don't grasp what Fontaine and Ms Malloch and Mann are doing in a cruder sense - attempting to make the price of questioning Big Climate too high.
You miss
the point of Science.
I totally get
the point of science.
Hellooooo, that's
the point of science — to figure out what we can't explain.
That's not
the point of science.
But as far as I can tell — and isn't
the point of science that all its bigger propositions come accompanied by this noble caveat?
Also, the whole
point of science is to ask questions and get answers from as many perspectives as possible.»
After all, what is
the point of science if it isn't going to be made use of.
The whole
point of science is to ask a question and see where it leads.
If religion is right, what is
the point of science when everything in the universe can be explained by a higher power creating and controlling all?
We are not quite to
the point of the science fiction concepts of instant knowledge, though rapidly science fiction becomes science fact.
I suggest; you guys occasionally should look at it from the» denier's»
point of science.
The whole
point of science is that science gets answers that are more truthful than any previous method's answers.
Proclaiming beliefs on a science blog kind of misses
the point of science.
Nova says
the point of all science is to predict and I'm trying to find out what she uses in her predictions and where we might find them.