Using a father / son analogy to describe gods relationship with humans is wrong and misunderstanding the
whole point of the analogy in the first place.
But knowing which case is which in any particular issue simply by looking for
points of analogy with previous issues, but without actually examining the data and theory directly, is impossible.
's affectionate Greek chorus is the
obvious point of analogy, and so we expect another heavy, forgiving sigh about human foibles, this time in the eternal city, as per Allen's European funding.
Mighty Aphrodite's affectionate Greek chorus is the
obvious point of analogy, and so we expect another heavy, forgiving sigh about human foibles, this time in the eternal city, as per Allen's European funding.
You once again show you can't grasp
the point of analogies, nor understand what words like «anthropogenic» mean.
I understand that
this point of an analogy for an argument is entirely peripheral to the main game here, but I still don't see why people should get a free pass to Make Stuff Up.