Take every opportunity to discuss the
fine points of a piece with as many different experts, curators, artists, collectors, gallery personnel and other informed industry people as possible.
Wireframe and draft: Start by plotting the major persuasion
points of your piece in line with a formula like AIDA: Attention, Interest, Design and Action.
All of this gets at one of the
critical points of the piece, which is the contentious historical relationship between white men and black women, one that is loaded with connotations of abuse of power.
(If your article is actually about a writer's failings — if the
whole point of the piece is to ask how a man could be so perceptive in some ways and yet so moronic in others — then that of course is something else entirely.)
I am grateful for the opportunity to do two things in response: first, to clear up a misunderstanding that my article may have suggested; and second, to reemphasize one of the
main points of the piece — namely, that pacifists have a very difficult time trying to think in just war terms.
I think you are missing
the point of the piece.
The whole
point of my piece was to provide the evidence that Professor Rougeau seeks.
Let me be clear up front:
the point of this piece is not to debate the jury's verdict on George Zimmerman.
The point of the piece appears to question whether Arsenal should have signed Fabregas as well as another top player in either Suarez and Alexis.
In the end
the point of this piece isn't to discuss how much certain players care.
The point of this piece is not to knock Giroud or kiss Özil's butt.
I struggled to see
the point of this piece — apart from telling us how the CWU is responding to Labour's rule change regarding TU members.
most of the time, I find myself stumbling through my front door around 8 or 9 p.m., bone - tired from my day, with a hungry cat, husband, and self to feed (before we get into it: Yes, I'm a feminist; yes, my husband often handles the cooking; yes, this is a digression from
the point of this piece).
This combined with the quality and price -
point of each piece, makes AUrate one of my favorite brands when it comes to jewelry.
-- Joe Posnanski, «Oscar Predictions 2016,» Are asides more interesting than
the point of the piece?
I have deliberately abstained from such a demonstration in this article because that earlier demonstration apparently obscured the whole
point of that piece.
Long time reader / lurker, first time commenting: I just want to quibble with one
point of the piece.
The point of this piece is to tell you not to look at the level of risky interest rates, but to look at the rate of change in risky interest rates.
The point of his piece is that bond yields will most likely fall below inflation for years to come due to excessive debt and low interest rates and that investors should take a look at their portfolios and make some changes.
You sort of wish it was a work by Koo herself — but then
the point of these pieces is that they couldn't have been made without her.
The Turner prize winner tells Kate Kellaway about
the point of a piece of A4 paper and broccoli on the eve of his Hayward retrospective
I wondered if I was paying enough attention to
the point of the piece and then decided to enjoy and worry about that later.
I'd have to point out that you're missing
the point of my piece, and the significance of «Millennial - scalestorminess variability in the northeastern United States during the Holoceneepoch,» the 2002 paper, coauthored by Realclimate's Eric Steig, that I focus on.
That was
the point of my pieces on the many «shapes» of climate knowledge.
One focal
point of his piece is recent comments by Times assistant managing editor Glenn Kramon, who (as I said above) was a central force behind the paper's sustained focus on energy and climate since the «Energy Challenge» series began in 2006.
Take your pick — oil shales in the US, Orinoco heavy from VZ, Madagascar, offshore Brazil — these all trump anything renewable on a cost basis today without a meaningful carbon price, and so with KXL blocked, that's what will fill the void, which is
the point of my piece.
Quibbling about how hazardous a waste it is, and how it compares to other wastes, was not really
the point of the piece.
The point of the piece is that walking while distracted by reading or using the keyboard or touchscreen may be distracting.
I thought
the point of the piece, although a little backhanded, was really the problem with the SCC appointment process, and the failures of its purported transparency.
This then leads to the main
point of this piece: #MeToo makes for captivating human interest stories and an empowering political movement, but it is irreconcilable with civil justice under our modern employment law system.
Now on to the focal
point of this piece....