Sentences with phrase «point of this post though»

I do have to wonder the point of the post though.

You're probably wondering what's the point of this post though, right?

Not exact matches

«At one point I recognized that Warren Buffett, though he had every advantage in learning from Ben Graham, did not copy Ben Graham, but rather set out on his own path, and ran money his way, by his own rules...» I have just quickly glanced at Bronte Capital's blog post, but I am sure Todd Combs and Ted Weschler were not hired because they lived and died by Buffet's word but rather because they manifested the teachings of value investing in their own styles.

Their point though is that the main stream media is attacking MK and her comments about Santa because of an article in the Post praising MK, that the main stream media wants to discredit her and Fox.

This is to davidnfran hay David you might have brought this up in a previous post I haven't read, but i did read quit a bit about your previous comments and replies at the beginning of this blog, so I was just wondering in light of what hebrews 6 and 10 say how would you enterprite passages like romans 8 verses 28 thrue 39 what point could paul have been trying to make in saying thoughs amazing things in romans chapter 8 verses 28 thrue 39 in light of hebrews 6 and 10, Pauls says that god foreknew and also predestined thoughs whom he called to be conformed to the image of his son so that he would be the first born among many brothers and then he goes on saying that neither death nor life nor angels nor rulers nor things present nor things to come nor powers nor hight nor death can ever separate us from the love of god in christ jesus so how would i inturprate that in light of that warning in hebrews 6 and 10,

I don't lambaste your posts to Bob even though much of the time they're poorly written and espouse points of view even I find are difficult to defend because I am adamantly in favor of gay marriage and equal rights.

How does this relate to your post: Well, though I think «spirituality» is a good transition word for people leaving the normal generic unhealthy trappings of religion and embracing healthier mental habits, I think you 5 points are perfect for any ideology.

Furthermore, the entire point of my post was to show that even though I am a Christian and do not agree with the atheist view of God (which is to say the idea of the absense of God), I STILL support this soldier in their right to attend the ceremony and NOT have to bow their head, and believe that any Christian or other person who would force this soldier to do so by threat of removal from the ceremony, is just plain wrong.

Many of the questions are similar though, so my wife says that maybe I should create a «FAQ» section to the blog, and that way, after I have answered a question, I can point people to the post where I have already answered it... I think I will follow her wise advice.

My point is this: even though I don't make your receipes very often (because I'm lazy, not because of you), I still read every post!

I love it when you post veg recipes and this one gets bonus points for creativity - I never would have thought of this even though I eat avocado and chickpeas frequently =)

Most of my regular readers are probably aware of the fact that all of my posts are vegan at this point, while my diet is largely, though not completely, plant based.

Retsub, Yes my friend its quite true that the posts are quadrupled after a poor performance but its partly because we are geared around weekend games and thats when most of the posters will come on here, I think aswel though that you may have a point in that alot of our fans habe become a little fickle but I have to say the last 8/9 seasons I have, as Im sure all our fans have, eagerly anticipated these big head to head games and I can only recall a couple of Spurs victories and an away win at Stamford Bridge among the success stories.

For the rest of this post though my point is those bloggers who are a little more established, not necessarily writing for longer but more in the limelight — or maybe blog - light, compared to those who are not so.

For the rest of this post though my point is those bloggers who are a little more established, not necessarily writing for longer but more in the limelight — or maybe blog - light, compared...

The point is that certain prominent denialists have the bad happen of searching for such caveats, then posting about them as though the amateur «auditor» were the first to think about these points, and as though the paper itself does NOT contain such caveats.

The point of my post, however, was that IgG testing isn't reliable, even though it's sold as if it is.

And I totally fell in love with the 3rd looks shoes (even though shoes aren't the main point of this post)... I have wanted those shoes so badly for a long time!

Worth pointing out again though that I, Edgar Wright, do NOT organise them and merely post on here when I hear of ones...

Though not the main theme of an excellent blog post, «Grabbing the Bull By The Horns: Cuomo, Nutter and the Backlash Against Making Sh*t Up,» DFER executive director Joe Williams indirectly points to the odd political bedfellows who are pushing for much needed changes in education.

This though was the point of my original post: i.e., that both print and digital readers have very good reasons for preferring to read in the formats they do, and to express the hope that each side will refrain from snarking about the other.

Suzanne said: It's amazing, though, that even when you point people at posts like the above or any of the other sites like Writer Beware, how many people still «fall» for the scams because of basic insecurity.

-LSB-...] disagree with some of the points made by Gavin in the Lulu posting, and he is right to quote Joel Friedlander (even though Joel's comments are taken slightly out of context re fiction / nonfiction -LSB-...]

For instance, in this post Larry Swedroe points out that a balanced portfolio of S&P 500 and treasuries, has higher returns and lower volatility when 5 % of the portfolio was allocated to GSCI Commodity index even though the GSCI Index trailed stocks by as much as 8 %.

Though this piece is about bottoms, not tops, I am going to use an old CC post of mine on tops to illustrate a point.

(Although I signal Friday as a deadline of sorts in this post, the steps I will highlight can be used at any point in time; I'm merely pointing out the stores whose increased earning rate ends Friday, though there are others with increased earning rates as well).

Your point is a good one, though, so I'll update the wording of the post to reflect that travel credits aren't the only redemption option but rather the only redemption option that returns 2 % or greater.

While even though you try rebate much of those PAID COSTs LATER, there exists nasty consequences (usually unplanned surprises for the faithful points chasers), e.g., please find data point learning of «Chaython September 21, 2017 at 1:52 pm» experience posted above here.

In the comments of this post from Doctor of Credit, someone was able to successfully apply for the 60,000 point offer on the business card even though they weren't targeted as the phone number on the application was a direct line to a department that handed this special offer.

Right now, I'm not building points with any hotel group though I do have large banks of miles with the airlines mentioned earlier in this post.

The blog post claims that all four games are being discounted, but as of the time of this writing, the main Play 2016 page shows only Headlander, Bound, and Brut @l as being discounted with Abzu still at its default $ 19.99 price point (even though the sale supposedly cuts it down to $ 15.99 for PS Plus members).

I would therefore be a little wary of giving that a number — it's an interesting point though, and I might explore that in a future post.

This seems to have a motive... i.e. to present posts her eon RC that can then be used on deinalist blogs to say RC does not look at «alternative opinion» (even though those alternative opinions have no relevance to the reality that is behind the argument, that of global warming is happening, human - caused, and at this point, irrefutable... unless you have a legitimate refutation??? I'd love to see that!!!).

Our first post on Crichton's new novel «State of Fear» hits most of the key points, though there are a few more errors in the book that we hope to expand upon in future posts.

Ironically, he cites this RC post as backing for his views, even though it clearly points out the error of neglecting thermal inertia.

Comparisons with the El Nino peak of 1998 enabled them to announce that global warming had stopped, a point which was amplified in vast numbers of opinion pieces, blog posts and public statements, though not, to my knowledge, defended by any peer - reviewed statistical analysis.

Since I'm at least half to blame for the existence of this thread (though not entirely as I would not have posted here without Judy's persistence in asking me to post my analysis) I probably owe the thread a summary of my perspective on the outcome up to this point.

However, the point of this posting is to convince those WUWT readers, who, like Einstein, need a physical analogy before they will accept any mathematical abstraction, that the atmospheric «greenhouse» effect is indeed real, even though estimates of climate sensitivity to doubling of CO2 are most likely way over-estimated by the official climate Team.

I'm not sure what that has to do with any of my points or the subject of the post though — I'm trying to challenge my own reading of Judith's analysis of 50:50.

Now, I know that the environmental damage from wasting a goal post, which is made out of freaking metal, is huge and who knows what the paint is doing to the life in the pond (even though they are usually retrieved from the pond afterwards) but I bring it up just to point out that, yeah, anyone that supports college sports or attends any kind of major event with a lot of people and concessions or wipes their butt will be contributing to waste.

What concerns me most is you responded to the part of my post that you took personally, though it wasn't really a key point.

RealClimate is wonderful, and an excellent source of reliable information.As I've said before, methane is an extremely dangerous component to global warming.Comment # 20 is correct.There is a sharp melting point to frozen methane.A huge increase in the release of methane could happen within the next 50 years.At what point in the Earth's temperature rise and the rise of co2 would a huge methane melt occur?No one has answered that definitive issue.If I ask you all at what point would huge amounts of extra methane start melting, i.e at what temperature rise of the ocean near the Artic methane ice deposits would the methane melt, or at what point in the rise of co2 concentrations in the atmosphere would the methane melt, I believe that no one could currently tell me the actual answer as to where the sharp melting point exists.Of course, once that tipping point has been reached, and billions of tons of methane outgass from what had been locked stores of methane, locked away for an eternity, it is exactly the same as the burning of stored fossil fuels which have been stored for an eternity as well.And even though methane does not have as long a life as co2, while it is around in the air it can cause other tipping points, i.e. permafrost melting, to arrive much sooner.I will reiterate what I've said before on this and other sites.Methane is a hugely underreported, underestimated risk.How about RealClimate attempts to model exactly what would happen to other tipping points, such as the melting permafrost, if indeed a huge increase in the melting of the methal hydrate ice WERE to occur within the next 50 years.My amateur guess is that the huge, albeit temporary, increase in methane over even three or four decades might push other relevent tipping points to arrive much, much, sooner than they normally would, thereby vastly incresing negative feedback mechanisms.We KNOW that quick, huge, changes occured in the Earth's climate in the past.See other relevent posts in the past from Realclimate.Climate often does not change slowly, but undergoes huge, quick, changes periodically, due to negative feedbacks accumulating, and tipping the climate to a quick change.Why should the danger from huge potential methane releases be vievwed with any less trepidation?

Though the phenomenon may indeed be partly the result of self - fulfilling prophecy; the Washington Post points out that «when one news report about dead birds becomes big news, a few dead birds anywhere in the world becomes big news.»

The IPCC has chosen 1950 as the starting point for their confabulations, because they have the preconceived notion that human GHG emissions (mainly CO2) are the main drivers of the global temperature (the CAGW enthusiasts prefer the post - satellite era because it renders a trend of about 0.16 °C / decade, even though they invariably select one of the terrestrial records, usually GISTEMP).

Though I agree with many of O'Keefe's points (and invite discussion below), I can't close this post without noting that many of the Legal Blogwatch Affiliate Blogs are included on the ABA's list, including my home blog, MyShingle, my colleague Bob Ambrogi's Law Sites, Craig Williams» May It Please the Court, Bruce Macewen's Adam Smith, Esq., Counsel to Counsel, How Appealing, Blog of the Legal Times and Larry Bodine's Law Marketing Blog.

Unfortunately, though, anyone reading one of their older posts might be confused when the «link in bio» has changed to point somewhere unrelated.

It's not clear at this point which YouTube users have already received the dark mode option, though a number of commenters on the original Reddit posting chimed in to say that they've just received the new setting, too, along with the original poster.

The blog post doesn't indicate why Oppo Digital is ceasing development of new hardware, though the wording in the post points to financial woes — perhaps not all that surprising for a company best known for making high - end Blu - ray players in a market increasingly reliant on streaming.

(At some point I'd spring for the hub, too, though that's another $ 60 and thus outside the scope of this post.)

I encourage you though to reply about this post in my original post, (https://www.biggerpockets.com/forums/12/topics/253794-how-do-i-just-start) as I would lie to keep this clean short, straight to the point, step by step recipe NOT from the perspective of an already successful investor like you all, but from the eyes of a newbie that is at ground 0!