Sentences with phrase «point of this post which»

Your cage really has been rattled today Buddy and you really did miss the point of my post which was just my opinion.

Filler for the whole point of this post which is what Sam posted on Instagram today:

Not exact matches

Some of the posts may not immediately stand out as advertisements on your feed, which is the whole point.

Forrester VP and principal analyst Nate Elliot writes in a blog post marketers couldn't «count on much organic reach or engagement anyway» and points to an Ogilvy report which stated large brands» Facebook posts reached only 2 percent of fans.

Not only has its online traffic expanded to the point where it is neck - and - neck with the New York Times, but the Post recently said that it is profitable, which puts it in a very select group of print - based media companies.

Sony, which recently posted its biggest loss in history, points to one bright spot in its portfolio of businesses, its Networked Products and Services division.

Select the subheadings of your blog post (which are likely the key points) to add them to your storyboard.

Most recently, Theranos posted a point - for - point rebuttal of the Journal's allegations, citing the date in which it says it provided reporter John Carreyrou with each counterargument.

Kim pointed to one of his own posts on Medium about multitasking, which was shared by Huffington Post founder Arianna Huffington and syndicated by the New York Observer, Time Magazine and Mental Floss because he created a custom audience of Medium users on Twitter who are more likely to share and heart the pPost founder Arianna Huffington and syndicated by the New York Observer, Time Magazine and Mental Floss because he created a custom audience of Medium users on Twitter who are more likely to share and heart the postpost.

For example, posting content off of your website with links pointing back to it will generate referral traffic, which you can use as a way to gauge off - site reader interest.

Market Vectors Coal ETF ($ KOL), which we initially pointed out in this January 3 blog post as a potential trend reversal buy setup, continues to chop around in a sideways range since clearing resistance of its 200 - day moving average on January 2.

Which is one of the points of the post.

Yesterday I was reading an interesting point of view expressed in an editorial in The Financial Post which perhaps you saw.

Third and finally, the traditional story misses the real function of private banks, which is to solve an information problem in the purest Hayekian senses. That is, banks are or should be specialists in risk assessment and risk taking. They should know their client, understand the local market and have their pulse on the broad economy. Arguably, if properly structured, they can and should do this better than other entities such as governments. In other words, the proper role of banks should be underwriting — lend money, hold the debt, and bear the risk. Which is a long - winded way of getting to the main point of this which is to solve an information problem in the purest Hayekian senses. That is, banks are or should be specialists in risk assessment and risk taking. They should know their client, understand the local market and have their pulse on the broad economy. Arguably, if properly structured, they can and should do this better than other entities such as governments. In other words, the proper role of banks should be underwriting — lend money, hold the debt, and bear the risk. Which is a long - winded way of getting to the main point of this Which is a long - winded way of getting to the main point of this post.

P.s., Understanding the previous discussion of the restaurant microeconomics depends on the reader understanding these points which I raised in my post on Michael Porter (his quotes are in bold and mine are in plain text as is usual):

I appreciate the difference in duration which is the primary point of this post.

Some of us post here because of the religulous predilection for s.exual repression and hypocrisy, which I never get tired of pointing out to people.

Mark Bauerlein's post on the rhetoric of anti-discrimination points clearly to the problem which traditionalists face: In a world where ethics is aesthetics, the language of victimhood has become a subjective concept which is a potent weapon in the hands of the powerful.

Please anyone who responds to this don't name names; those of us familiar with the writing styles know which posts we're talking about and there's no point in stirring things.

kind of liked this post not every part of it — there was some points which i found a little off but all in all it was a nice read, thank you for the post!

I fail to see how that response has anything to do with the point that I was trying to make, and, seeing as how you seem to have missed my postings intention entirely, I will not bother reading too deeply into your thoughtful analysis of my commentary in return, which would no doubt be an engaging and intellectual adventure.

Actually, Katherine, a major thrust of the post, and the point to which I believe is challenged by the verse I cited, is that doctrinal differences should be subordinated to the goal of getting along in «love».

They could point to differences in terminology and word usage, «errors» of the text which «pre date» or «post date» the author, and why certain elements of his book show clear evidence of redaction and editing.

Aside from also starting to post more photos on my blog (which idea I see you gleaned from monitoring my brainwaves as well), Dean and I were just talking about this story yesterday and how the point is not doing vs. being, but never being distracted from being a disciple; which is really just being close to Jesus, doing what he does, listening to what he says and going with his agenda instead of ours.

the fifth: women are narcissistic propagandists for protesting misogynist violence okay, the closest I've seen to this is when matt posts about the inconsistencies of many, many liberal agendas, the points out that certain groups have ideas which, logically, are completely opposed

Back to the main point of your post, which I think if I understand you right your question is, «Why do atheist come to the * faith * based blog to chat about religion, or in your words, bash religion?

Jared has clarified his critique of evangelicals, which seems to be a sociological critique that, regardless of what we say at the end of the day, our orientation reveals that the political has in fact become an idol.I think it's worth bringing up at this point Joe's post from way back....

The post materialized after a long phone conversation between us in the wake of my controversial post about Dave Ramsey and poverty, at which point I realized my sister knew way more about this topic than I did.

In a comment after the post, he tries to justify his position by pointing to Song of Songs, in which the suitor says of his beloved, «Her neck is like the tower of David, and her necklaces like a thousand bucklers,» and «a garden locked is my sister, my bride,» implying that the love poem is characterized by male authority and female submission.

Councillor Toby Neal at Nottingham City Council was quoted by the Nottingham Post as saying: «Whilst respecting the court's decision, I feel the judge has missed the point of us bringing this action, which was to protect people from feeling bullied and intimidated while accessing hospital services - something we don't welcome in our city.»

I agree, which is partly the point of my post.

And then they quote a verse or ten which they believe disproves the point of my post.

I can understand making the point that the people of Ferguson should be invited to forgive what they perceived as a wrong on the part of the officer...... but for you to make the assumption and then state that the Officer's action was «wrong» (if that is what you meant to say) is not something I can agree with, not without your full rationale (which maybe I missed from an earlier post)....

If this were done, then the inevitable danger which every dogmatician must, confront [and here lies the dignity and greatness of his task] would be more clearly recognized: namely, the danger that he may not remain upon an extension of the biblical line, but rather interpret the biblical texts primarily ex post facto, from the point of view of his «going beyond the New Testament.

Shadowflash, I don't recall your response to any of my posts... I usually do recall them... But I do agree with one thing you said... «human mind hates being wrong» But I see it differently then you do... I see human mind and human understanding being the stumbling block and point of pride, which prevents man from seeing the reality of his real condition, and the need to humble himself in order to be able to see himself as he is, and seek the help of His Creator without whom he is a living, moving shell, yet, without the vital part of him being alive, which would make him complete.

How again does your point engender itself to the attempt at a faith based argument which is the whole point of this post?

Furthermore, the entire point of my post was to show that even though I am a Christian and do not agree with the atheist view of God (which is to say the idea of the absense of God), I STILL support this soldier in their right to attend the ceremony and NOT have to bow their head, and believe that any Christian or other person who would force this soldier to do so by threat of removal from the ceremony, is just plain wrong.

The Protestant will regard specific norms, in the moral sphere, even in the form in which they appear in scripture, rather as a sort of sign - post pointing out the way to meet and endure the ever new situations of the personal life of faith, with a critical attitude towards oneself and one's hidden sinfulness.

In early November, for instance, Francis Phillips, in her Catholic Herald blog, scored something of a bull's eye, with a post in which she pointed out that Tesco had ended its support for a major cancer research event, but instead made a large contribution to London's main annual gay prideevent.

Since I used to be a hyper 5 - point Calvinist, but slowly rejected Calvinism over a period of about 15 years, I have always wanted to write a series of posts in which I take the passages used to support Calvinism and show how I understand these texts.

I believe that the point of Mr. Farrakhan's post is the key point of Islam, which is that there is only one God.

His resignation comes on the heels of a controversial post on his website, sakeenah.org, in which he claimed that «an enormously overwhelming percentage of people struggle with homosexual feeling because of some form of violent emotional or sexual abuse at some point in their life.»

I think you may be missing the main point, of - hippypoet's assertion which he mentions in the second part of his posting.

The point of this blog is just to save time looking for a great recipe because you will find it very quickly through different cupcake categories, but the instructions will be found on the original blog which you will visit by clicking the link under the photo of the cupcake on every post.

Which brings me right to the point of our post today!

Miami comes in with a middle - of - the - road defense ranked No. 15 (23 points per game allowed) to go against the Jags» bottom - ranked offense, which has posted just 15 points per contest.

I may not agree with everything she says, but at least her points are thought out and pretty well articulated, unlike a lot of the posts here which are childish, and make no particular point at all.

On a wider point, please believe me that I DO respect and generally agree with your posts and I like the fact that you can express them so well, and with truth as you see it (which is all that any of us can do) which is not given to all on here.

My issue is I just don't see any Ferrari's in the 2018 draft, which was the whole point of my original post.

We do need to spread it but I can't do it alone so If you are a member of another Arsenal site then please do copy and paste my post (just get permission from admin of the site first if your gonna keep re-posting it, which is the point).