However, religion does not stop that at all, and in fact usually positions itself to profit handsomely — cases in
point of your new religion: the Crusades, and the invasions of Russia in the 1200s by Teutonic Knights to bring the Eastern Orthodoxy back under Catholic rule (brutal, by the way).
Not exact matches
Six years before that, Paul Vitz had made a similar
point in Psychology as
Religion: psychology, he wrote, had become a substitute for faith» a
new religion encouraging a cult
of self - worship.
And the book also offers a deliberately wide array
of approaches to trinitarian issues, including not only historical and systematic theologians, but biblical scholars and analytic philosophers
of religion, writing from a variety
of theological and communal
points of view» Roman Catholic, Protestant, and, in one case, Jewish (the
New Testament scholar Alan Segal, who contributes an instructive if somewhat technical chapter on the role
of conflicts between Jews and Christians in the emergence
of early trinitarian teaching).
The things I find most appalling about
religion reach a
new zenith in Islam --(i) a dulling down
of individual thought and a dogmatic requirement to conform to the views
of the masses; (ii) a stultifying ignorant education system in which anything inconsistent with the Qur» an is not just discouraged, but censored; (iii) the subjugation
of women to the
point of educating them to be nothing but mindless f * king, breeding machines for their insecure husbands; (iv) a political class that feeds off the religious - based ignorance it imposes on its populations; and (v) a general back - sliding against the rest
of the planet because heads are buried in Dark Ages mythology.
Leaving aside lame arguments as to whether it provides some type
of support for the Abrahamic
religions, the author seems to have missed the entire
point of the
new discovery.
Martel
points to this growing interest in
religion, coupled with a rejection
of materialism and a
new concern for the environment as the source for youth activism.
From the
point of view
of serious Buddhists, the
new religion of consumerism is a spiritual disaster.
Bousset has
pointed out the gradual transformation
of Judaism, during the period between the Old and
New Testaments, from a national cultus to a
religion of individual piety — a
religion of observance rather than
of theology, on the one hand, or
of deep personal feeling, on the other.
One can
point to the emergence
of a variety
of critical approaches to
religion in general, and to Christianity in particular, which have contributed to the breakdown
of certainties: These include historical - critical and other
new methods for the study
of biblical texts, feminist criticism
of Christian history and theology, Marxist analysis
of the function
of religious communities, black studies
pointing to long - obscured realities, sociological and anthropological research in regard to cross-cultural religious life, and examinations
of traditional teachings by non-Western scholars.
The appeal
of New Age and human - potential therapies is that they give expression to the personal and mystical and do so — as Catherine Albanese
points out — by «reprimitivizing»
religion.
Just because Wars had been waged in the name
of religion doesn't make the
point of it Wrong,,, otherwise why does it say (He who loves me, keeps my commandments) almost at the same time as it says (I give you a
new commandment, love...) in short, Yes, Jesus is what matters, but to know Jesus I need His word, the Bible, I need a relationship with Him, I need to understand What He wants me to be Like (Be Holy as your Father in Heaven) which is not just an old testament quote, but a
new Testament as well,,, at the end, if
Religion was so pointless and to be hated, why Would God ask us to test the spirits, why does he tell us (by their fruits you would know them.)
The myth
of a mystery
religion (or the symbol
of the comparative - religious school) could only
point Out what ought to be; as the «law»
of the Hellenistic world it would simply be a
new legalism ending like the Jewish law in despair (Rom.
He reflects a most parochial view
of religion in
New York City where, he says, «dead churches are gutted to make nightclubs, supermarkets, and, especially, condominiums, in which the vaulted ceilings above the sanctuary became a valued selling
point.»
This rebirth, as we have learnt from the History
of Religions, is the universal longing
of man, and the
New Testament satisfies that longing by
pointing to him who is exalted on the cross and to heaven (John 3).
On the contrary, he finds it useful to ponder an array
of reductionist attempts to explain the existence
of religion, from that which seeks to pinpoint the area
of the human brain or the specific genes connected to religiosity to that which sees
religion as a malfunction
of the human mind or a vestigial remnant from a primitive stage
of human development suitable only for whimpering, immature dullards (a
point of view championed by the
new atheists).
In fact, the vision
of Peter that God in Christ had destroyed purity - impurity divide between Jew and Gentile (Acts 10) was a turning
point in the early church to build a
new koinonia transcending
religions.
The general
point that has been made is that in the
new conditions
of the modern world the comparative study
of religion has moved into a
new phase — first, in that the object
of inquiry has on a quite
new scale been seen to be communities
of persons.
Mindful that even as
new principles are proclaimed, old habits die hard and citizens and politicians could tend to entangle government and
religion (e.g., «the appointment
of chaplains to the two houses
of Congress» and «for the army and navy» and «[r] eligious proclamations by the Executive recommending thanksgivings and fasts»), he considered the question whether these actions were «consistent with the Constitution, and with the pure principle
of religious freedom» and responded: «In strictness the answer on both
points must be in the negative.
Aloysius Pieris
of Sri Lanka
points out that the concept
of «liberation» is not
new and mentions various perceptions
of liberation found in ancient philosophy, Roman theology,
religions of Asia, and Marxism.
Now, I'm not going to go into great detail about how I think you might just be missing the
point, though I will suggest that perhaps you'd be more persuasive if you considered the question
of whether anyone ASKED those «black folks» whether or not they wanted to be brought in chains to the
New World, kept in servitude for centuries, stripped
of their cultures and their very names and forcibly converted to an alien
religion.
DreamWorks Animation's toon film Home and The SpongeBob Movie: Sponge Out
of Water, produced by Nickelodeon Movies and Paramount Animation, are outside players, while the unrelated Brazilian movie The Boy and the World, The Boy and the Beast from Mamoru Hosoda and Studio Chizu, The Laws
of the Universe Part 0 (based on the teachings
of a
new Japanese
religion called Happy Science), the Finnish film Moomins on the Riviera and Regular Show: The Movie, an animated film based on the Cartoon Network original series — are unknown quantities at this
point.
Allen revisits many (if not all)
of his familiar themes:
religion and the afterlife, misfit relationships, Los Angeles vs
New York, jazz, older man / younger woman, and one
of his favorites... «what's the
point?»
Players are given the option
of founding 11 different customizable
religions powered by Faith
points, a
new resource similar to science and culture.
The painters and sculptors
of the Italian Renaissance are most noted for their melding
of religion and realism; the Romantic movement in England, appropriately, centered on the artist's individual feelings and motivations while still making the language accessible to the common reader; China's Tang Dynasty allowed art and poetry became more popular among the middle and lower classes than ever before, and while landscapes and nature remained the focal
point of most art, increased contact with
new foreign countries expanded their own artists» techniques.
A case in
point is «the enigmatic, fantastically erudite artist Raymond Pettibon,» as Peter Schjeldahl called him in a recent
New Yorker review, whose work embraces a wide spectrum
of American high and low culture, from the deviations
of marginal youth to art history, literature, sports,
religion, politics, and sexuality.
Just calling environmentalism «a
new religion» misses the
point I think, since
religion demands a conscious decision on the part
of its believers.
New York About Blog The Revealer publishes writing that reflects upon
religion as a key
point of intersection between beliefs, practices, politics, representation, economics, and identity, where the important forces that shape individuals, societies, and their relationship to each other, play out.