Their adherence to the logic of single -
point perspective further suggests a backward spatial movement, this one more conspicuous than the dividing ruler.
Not exact matches
As an aside, the irony might be lost on you that, despite the fact that so many atheists here are so quick to note that believers do not have a monopoly on morals, you are essentially proving the
point of believers that, from a historical
perspective, atheists
far more than believers have lacked morals vis - a-vis war and death.
In this
perspective, the existence of God,
far from being disproved by science is something
pointed to clearly by the Unity - Law of material being and the universal, ordered inter-dependence within creation.
However, rather than simply accepting the opinion of states and critical Western scholars as the
point of reference, the edited book Responsibility to Protect: Cultural
Perspectives in the Global South by Rama Mani and Tom Weiss addresses the important and so
far under - researched question of what scholars and activists from the global south really think about the R2P principle and how the R2P implementation process can account for those southern concerns and insights.
(3) To some extent the differences in
perspective might simply reflect differences in ideological starting -
points rather than real, underlying differences that will persist as ideas are
further discussed.
For that level of
perspective and self - punishment, I
point you to John's
far more well - informed take here.
I certainly agree with most of your
points... but let me explain a bit
further the
perspective I am coming from.
I don't keep track / archive most stuff though: a) if it's related to an investment theme /
perspective, I find I retain the key
points as I build up a much bigger picture — I don't save, unless there's some obviously useful data / charts / graph I can refer back to, and b) any company or analysis I come across that seems any way interesting — I don't retain, since I would have to do my own analysis anyway, but I do record the company / ticker in a file I keep for
further analysis or monitoring.
Instead of droning on about the same countless problems and complaints that most other players have already
pointed out in preliminary reviews, forum posts, and rants, I'm here to give an overall impression of the game from the
perspective of a gamer that has seen more than their fair share of Massively Multiplayer Online Role - Playing Games (MMORPG's), as
far back as the dread days of Ultima Online.
The Project Space XCHANGE Festival goes
far beyond a formal exchange and initiates a joint change of
perspective as starting
point for new projects.
Jacotey's work draws inspiration from the gathering of people together, the expression of emotions in their many and varied interactions and the contexts and details in which these engagements take place — architecture, landscape, or place; picking out wallpaper, furniture, clothes, and zooming in
further to detail pattern, patina, texture... Her works — though insistently manual in their making (paintings on plaster and dust sheets, pencil drawings, sewing and fabric)-- make use of
perspectives that reference the world of cinema and slo - mo, the photographer's
point and shoot, identifying an artist who has come of age in the smartphone world with its prevalent verbs — zoom, scroll, tap, drag, swipe etc..
Nuclear defenders are calling for keeping things in
perspective — fossil fuels, they
point out, have many more costs and risks associated with them than nuclear power; and newer generation reactor designs are
far safer than those built in Japan many decades ago (a number of US plants from the same era have the same or similar designs).
In
perspective, given the time scale involved, a 100 years is short, climate fluctates, it occurs rapidly, and is merely a regular physical phenomenon, even though, as the above gentlemen have
pointed out, is still a mystery as
far as adequate explanation by sound theory is wanting — which is altogether different to what the boosters of AGW assert as science, theory, and evidence.
However, as you have
pointed out, the expectation from a physics
perspective is that CO2 does have an influence on temperature, so it seems worthwhile pursuing the stochastic analysis
further.)
Ted Frank offers an interesting
perspective at
Point of Law, suggesting that the problem of pursuing litigation as a path when it's not economically justified poses a
far greater problem than bill padding He writes:
This distinction, while understandable and useful from a methodological
point of view, ensuring that the appropriate
perspective is in fact adopted, does begin to break down on
further analysis and in the interpretation and application of the exclusion clause in particular.
As she says, «Anger is an important emotion» but «when tempers flare our capacity for clear thinking, empathy, and creative problem - solving go down the drain...» Discussions are
far more likely to prove productive when both parties are calm enough to be open to hearing the other person's
perspective, and to be able to express their own concerns without finger -
pointing.
The confidentiality relating to offer substance (multiple offer scenarios) from an industry
perspective and in particular at the
point when all offers have been presented is
further reinforced by the following: