Sentences with phrase «point posts there»

Worth noting is that old comments have not been ported over, but the old forum is still open until February 14th, at which point posts there will be archived (but still viewable).

Not exact matches

As Claire Fallon, the Huffington Post's books and culture writer, points out, there are plenty of other reasons why ebooks may never catch on with a larger crowd.

Then there was the «hash crash» of 2013, when the Dow dropped 145 points in two minutes after someone hacked the Associated Press's Twitter account and posted, falsely, that explosions in the White House had injured President Obama.

You can still go back and you can look on the Zillow blog and see posts that I wrote, and Stan, who by this point had become our chief economist, wrote about how it was obvious, in our opinion, that housing was going to crash and that it was built on the foundation of sand and there was too much easy credit that had allowed people to buy homes who really couldn't afford them.

There is really no point in posting the exact same post to all the networks you are present on, because it discourages people from following you on different platforms.

Ashish Jha, the senior author of the JAMA Internal Medicine paper, points out in a blog post that there are reasons why women doctors might well deliver better care, citing research to suggest that they might adhere more closely to established clinical practice guidelines and that patients often report better personal experiences (something that ultimately might lead to better outcomes).

On the other hand, there are those pages that post several times in a day to the point that people can't tell if it's a new post or they are experiencing deja vu.

I pointed out that while it's true that there are fewer smaller banks, this is a long - term trend that did not accelerate post Dodd - Frank.

There is no point in writing a blog post to answer a question if Google believes listicles and image content best answer the query.

However, living in India and having worked as analytics provider for a brick and mortar and ecommerce giant based in US, I can tell few points from my experience: 1: Ecommerce in India: There is a lot of potential but challenges are equally crippling: a: Flipkart recently got devalued from 15 to 11 billion and has failed to post profits in its entire history of existence.

I'm not a big fan of live blogging at conferences since there is no point in posting word for word what was said at the session.

A couple of weeks ago I posted some information about the «Great Depression of 1873 - 1896 ″ to make the point that there was no depression, great or otherwise, during this period, but that the period did contain some financial crises / panics.

The purpose of this post is to point out that while the payment of interest on bank reserves is now the Fed's primary tool for implementing rate hikes, there are two other tools that the Fed will use over the years ahead in its efforts to manipulate short - term US interest rates and distort the economy.

Well excellent point you got there mate.Google and MSN have different ways to improve link popularity and this makes explaining between those two pretty different.I guess Link building posts are hard to find these days.

Points raised in the blog post include the following: - There are people and groups on both the left and right of the political spectrum who favour a Guaranteed Annual -LSB-...]

There is no point posting on here that evolutionary theory is unproven because every theory can not be completely proven.

At the time of this post, these were the best - known redemptions out there for Chase points.

Post something critical about Obama's socks or point out that the Big East had more teams in the tournament than anyone else because there are, like, thirty - seven teams in the conference, and someone out there will curse the day you were born.

There are so many things wrong with the history of your posts it will take too long to point them all out and correct them than I have available at the moment.

your immature, irrational and absolute blind remarks toward atheism have been proved that there is no rational argument beyond this point, I suggest you read my post to the fullest and absorb it's meaning, and continue to act like a civilized being, your behavior is not acceptable in any rational debate, you are not making yourself look good.

Please anyone who responds to this don't name names; those of us familiar with the writing styles know which posts we're talking about and there's no point in stirring things.

This is why I pointed people to my blog to answer some of the questions I have posted there.

kind of liked this post not every part of it — there was some points which i found a little off but all in all it was a nice read, thank you for the post!

As has been pointed out, there don't appear to be any posting to such.

The whole point of my post was to say that many, many such phenomena are dismissed as being some mysterious but material event, when it is clear there is not only a violation of physical laws, but that some kind of intelligence is involve in the violation.

There seems to be no end to general themes and verses pointing out the fallacies in this post, EVEN IF THE INTENT WAS WELL - MEANING AND LAUDABLE.

Just to elaborate EVER so briefly on what I just posted there, from the Book of Job itself, if the point of Job is that it's all about delighting in the abstract and the question, why would Job say in 42:6 that he «despises» himself and «repents»?

Hmm, Reality, you do have a point there on your last post.

That is the point of this post (if there is a point).

Robert Cheeks suggests in his comment on my last Songbook post that if there aren't any, there's really no point in me saying that Rock is ambivalent about or even resistant to modernity.

@Michael of Michigan — You just gave it all away right there in your own post: QUOTE - «Or if you said we are unable at this point in science and technology to observe God, then you would have been correct.»

I really hope this is a big setup, since the letter to the Hebrews is mentioned there at the end and tends to contradict several points made in the post...

Happy Jack — I didn't say there was a set of established morals for Atheists, in fact i noted that there was NOT a set of morals, if you want to know if Atheists have morals and where they come from you'd probably have to ask an atheist, my post was simply pointing to the fact that the dictators i was talking about did not have a specific set of morals telling them that Murdering millions of people was wrong.

Please, for the love of all that is good and pure in the world, just stop posting things like «Well that's just great» or «I guess there's no point even trying».

Thou shalt not say cryptically dramatic things to get attention Please stop posting things like «I guess there's no point even trying» and «Never push a forgiving person too far.

I just posted this on another topic... change a few words, youll get the point: In an ideal situation, «World Religions» would be part of a «World History» class, unfortunately, in the USA, there are far too many conservative Christians with power to rewrite history, make whole groups of people second class citizens by making laws against them, and travel the world trying to convert non-Christians through our Military, Politicians, humanitarian efforts and more.

As I pointed out in a previous posting, there are only three essentials to doing church.

All posts like yours do is point at a cut when there is a laceration of an artery in this country.

The point to this post (there is one, I promise) is that the real problem for me isn't their views of the Creation account.

In addition to yesterday's post and my response to the comments there, I will point out the obvious.

If there is no punchline, what is your point of asking questions unrelated to the post that didn't go anywhere?

I was not there, and I did not know Apostles during their lifetimes, but the point of my post is that they were reliable, honest, and authoritative sources.

One of the comments on that post point out exactly what I suspect is the real reason waterboarding is considered «torture» by some: the people doing it to you are your enemies and so there is no way to «tap out.»

I was not there, and I did not know them during their lifetimes, but the point of my post is that they were reliable, honest, and authoritative sources.

Don't fall into CNN or Fox Network lies, they don't care about God or your eternal salvation, just posting something so Ungodly like this is so Bad, (listen... Get close to Christ the redeemer of mankind) don't get into foolish arguments like this, Hollywood and all media is just the tipping point of the iceberg of something more evil happening, and to believers: get your doctrine straight and don't defend the works of this man (Stephen King) he is not giving glory to God with his live and work, there's many men of God that need your support that really give glory to God.

I was not there, and I did not know The Seven Dwarves during their lifetimes, but the point of my post is that they were reliable, honest, and authoritative sources.

@Mike: From Smurfettes post... «Oh, and I'm an atheist from the point of view that i do not believe that a god or gods exist, but i do not say — nor do i take the position — that there is no god or gods, as it is within the realm of possibility.»

So, I'm curious... @Lisa Needle's Eye's posting was about pointing out how there are things better in other countries, and not as good here, and «your» response to her was basically... «leave if you don't like it»...?

UPDATE # 2: I'm going to go ahead and close the comment thread on this post because a few folks seem rather eager to prove my point there, and I'm tired of reading and deleting this stuff.

I believe that the point of Mr. Farrakhan's post is the key point of Islam, which is that there is only one God.