Not exact matches
Capital punishment's lack of demonstrated superiority as a deterrent (the evidence for its effectiveness being at best mixed), the capacity of society to protect itself equally well by permanently imprisoning those who are currently being executed (which is possible at limited marginal cost, especially when one takes into account the cost of the extended trial procedures and interminable appeals and reviews which usually accompany capital punishment)-- all these
points are important, but their utility is chiefly as
rebuttal arguments in response to the empirically weak but emotionally strong claims made
on behalf of capital punishment.
Professor Matteo Luigi Napolitano, one of Italy's top authorities
on contemporary Church history, followed with a comprehensive
point - by -
point rebuttal of Corriere della Sera's story, noting, in particular, what Yad Vashem's file
on Palatucci found, in contrast to what the newspaper claimed.
It's basically a
point - by -
point rebuttal to Rick Warren's Purpose Driven Life and is a ruthless attack
on evangelicalism.
@Christine «You might want to add to your list of
rebuttal points that it's crazy to think that our ability to translate and interpret the bible without bias is somehow greater than our ability to tell right from wrong
on our own.»
Just wanted to compliment you
on your excellent, detailed 20 -
point rebuttal to that apologist's video in a conversation from last night.
Senate Republicans, not surprisingly, seized
on the seven - person dissent in the commission's preliminary report that gave a
pointed rebuttal to the public financing recommendation.
In a briefing with reporters at NYPD Headquarters, a news release that contained a
point - by -
point rebuttal and an appearance
on national television by the current commissioner, Bill Bratton, police officials denied any altering of statistics and defended the city's low crime figures for 2015.
When Horton ran complaints made by two more unnamed critics of the CDC center
on 3 March, CDC Director Thomas Frieden and the head of division under attack, Kevin De Cock, decided to take
on the critics
point by
point, which they do in a
rebuttal (PDF) that yesterday appeared online in The Lancet.
Pick any of the substantive
points and I'll
point you to a good
rebuttal (check the index, or the guide
on «A few things ill - considered» (see sidebar)-RRB-.
In response to the President's 2013 State of the Union address, Morano published a
point by
point rebuttal to the section
on climate change.
I believe that Dr. Greger tries to keep an eye
on requests for topics which are made in this forum, so I'm thinking that your request has been heard and hopefully you will get your
rebuttal either in a blog post or video at some
point in the future.
President Bush issued a
pointed rebuttal last week to critics of the No Child Left Behind Act, rejecting arguments that the law heaps unrealistic demands
on schools and vowing to oppose any efforts to weaken it.
Comments — Tom Semple's
rebuttal to a couple of
points made by James McQuivey in the interview last week, GuitarLover 1999
on the Joe Konrath interview, and Al MacDiarmid
on the wonders of Calibre.
I wrote my own
rebuttal to LL Barkat's piece
on my blog a few weeks ago http://bit.ly/11ZlMay I stressed the importance of not walling yourself into an ivory tower and
pointed out that Hugh Howey says his blog is one of the major things that contributed to his success.
I just want to make a quick
rebuttal on point 2, which is not quite what price elasticity suggests.
All of this is a preamble to a
point of
rebuttal to my commissioning colleague, and one that I think will be carried through to the East London Painting Prize: no, painting does not have to be
on canvas.
Rebuttals are not hard to find (if you go to «start here»
on the top of the RC page, and scroll to the section that says «Informed, but seeking serious discussion of common contrarian talking
points» each one of those links discusses this claim, and similar ones).
Pick any of the substantive
points and I'll
point you to a good
rebuttal (check the index, or the guide
on «A few things ill - considered» (see sidebar)-RRB-.
Brian, I'd recommend that you run the talking
points through a reality check before attaching your name to them — one excellent resource is skepticalscience.com, from whence (after.1 second of effort) I reached the
rebuttal to «Scientists predicted an impending ice age in the 1970's» («Is it really appropriate to compare the scientific evidence for an impending ice age in the 70's to the scientific consensus
on anthropogenic global warming today?»
Even if you did rebut all ten
points, it would have little effect
on the general public's understanding of the issue — other than to note that the «ten
points» were important enough to merit
rebuttal by an expert, so there must still be large uncertainty.
Duarte touches
on it well but why even quote the fictitious «97 %» propaganda talking
point as having any rational foundation at all as
rebuttal?
Monbiot, unlike Kleiman, makes some attempt at a reasoned
rebuttal of Wills, with four
points (really three:
on the global cooling hysteria, arctic ice disappearance, and the current absence of global warming).
He spent months painstakingly crafting a
point - by -
point, fact - based
rebuttal to Monckton's claims, then posted it
on the faculty website.
Scientists generally supporting the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change (IPCC) findings
on climate change see this correction of the UAH temperature analyses as a significant vindication of their findings
on this issue and, as such, as a major
rebuttal to climate contrarians who long had
pointed to the differences in surface and upper atmosphere warming trends as supporting their viewpoints.
Perhaps you didn't notice, but below Indermühle, et al., 1999,
on the same page in Science, was a written
rebuttal by Wagner, et al., that
points out that Indermühle, et al., rested their critique
on stomata measurements from «altitudinally and latitudinally contrasting growth areas,» and
on stomatal density measurements rather than the more reliable normalized stomatal index.
I wrote a
rebuttal to Feldthusen's letter that expands
on some of these
points: http://www.youthandwork.ca/2012/12/who-let-dogs-out-
rebuttal-to-bruce.html.
[13] I also note that the oral evidence of Dr. Makin reporting
on these studies is not significantly narrowed from the
point he makes in his written report and the defendants had agreed earlier that this was the proper subject of the
rebuttal reports of Dr. Caillier and Dr. Prout.
[8] In my view this is a proper basis for
rebuttal evidence
on this narrow
point; i.e., is a neurologist of the opinion that there can be a diagnosis of thoracic outlet syndrome in the absence of positive signs and a nerve conduction study?
There are limits
on rebuttal evidence, however, and one such limit is that the evidence called in
rebuttal must be truly responsive to the other sides case as opposed to addressing the
points that needed to be proven in the «case in chief `.
One argument that I already made is that modifying Bitcoin at this
point is simply too risky to be worth it; however, an even better
rebuttal can be made by simply flipping the argument
on its head.