Sentences with phrase «point scale ranging»

Both women and men estimated how frequently they experienced the described feelings by using a six - point scale ranging from not more than usual (0) to much more than usual (5).

All 112 items of the YSR are to be answered on a 3 - point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 2 (often), with higher scores indicating more problems.

The coding system contained 27 items on a 9 - point scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 9 (very much), indicating the extent to which the behavior was present during the discussion task.

Children are asked to rate each of the 13 items on a 3 - point scale ranging from 0 to 2 in terms of intensity of depressive symptoms during the past 2 weeks (e.g., «I felt miserable or unhappy», «I did everything wrong»).

Items are rated on a 4 - point scale ranging from 0 to 3 in terms of intensity of symptoms (e.g., change in appetite) and attitudes (e.g., pessimism) during the past 2 weeks.

The spouses were asked to assess their marital relationships on a six - point scale ranging from 0 to 5.

Mothers were asked to rate each of the 113 items on a 3 - point scale ranging from 0 (does not apply to the child) to 2 (clearly or often).

Following the recommendations of Ickes, Stinson, Bissonette and Garcia [21], five judges compared each inferred thought / feeling entry with the corresponding actual thought / feeling entry and rated their level of similarity on a 3 - point scale ranging from 0 (essentially different content) through 1 (somewhat similar but not the same content) to 2 (essentially the same content).

Items reflecting behaviours involving helping peers and exhibiting concern for them were rated by the teachers on a four - point scale ranging from not applicable (0) to fully applicable (3).

Ratings were on a 6 - point scale ranging from «never» to «at least once a week».

Participants were asked to indicate how much they used these strategies to cope with problems on 5 - point scale ranging from «Never» to «Very Often,» with higher scores indicating more frequent use of that coping strategy.

Each item is answered on a 6 - point scale ranging from strongly disagree (6) to strongly agree (1).

All items could be answered on a 5 - point scale ranging from 1 = never, to 5 = always.

Participants rated how frequently they exchanged these six types of support with their mother on an 8 - point scale ranging from 1 (less than once a year or not at all) to 8 (daily)(α = 0.79).

The 12 items are rated on a 5 - point scale ranging from 1 (almost never) to 5 (almost always), and the measure has excellent psychometric properties, including validity and reliability [36].

Mothers rated five items reflecting problems in the partner relationship, such as disagreements about childrearing and providing or receiving little partner support, along a three - point scale ranging from never (0) to always applicable (2).

Participants respond to the items on a 7 - point scale ranging from 0 (unlikely) to 4 (very likely).

Each of the five items was rated on a nine - point scale ranging from 0 (not at all a problem) to 8 (severely impaired) so that the total scores range between 0 and 40.22 The psychometric properties have been validated in large patient with CFS cohorts confirming that WSAS is a reliable assessment tool for disability.

Responses were on a 4 - point scale ranging from 1 (not at all true of me) to 4 (very true of me).

Items were rated on a 7 - point scale ranging from 1 (disagree strongly) to 7 (agree strongly).

It contains 21 items that are rated on a 4 - point scale ranging from 0 to 3.

Items are scored on a five - point scale ranging from «never» to «always.»

The severity of each experience is rated on a 4 - point scale ranging from «marked» to «little / none», based on specific rating rules and benchmarked thresholds.

The items are assessed on a 4 - point scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree).

All questions were answered by circling a number on a ten point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 10 (extremely).

Participants responded to the items using a 5 - point scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), and responses were coded and summed such that higher scores indicated higher peer acceptance.

Participants reported the extent to which they agreed with the trust items using a 5 - point scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).

Statements are rated on a 7 - point scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree) and are totaled for a final score.

The MSPSS consists of 12 items rated on a 7 - point scale ranging from 1 (very strongly disagree) to 7 (very strongly agree).

Items (e.g., «I could not «get going»» and «I felt that everything I did was an effort») were answered on a 4 - point scale ranging from 0 = rarely / none of the time to 3 = most of the time.

Responses were made using a 3 - point scale ranging from 1 = hardly ever (or never) to 3 = often.

The items in each subscale were on a four - point scale ranging from «strongly disagree» (1) to «strongly agree» (4) yielding possible scores from seven to 28, with a higher score indicating a greater level of general anxiety and depression.

At the same visit, frequency of cigarette smoking was measured via youth self report, on a 7 - point scale ranging from «not at all» to «about two packs a day.»

Youth baseline and follow - up interviews assessed mental health — related quality of life using the Mental Health Summary Score (MCS - 12)(range of possible scores, 0 - 100), 48,49 overall mental health using the Mental Health Inventory 5 (MHI - 5)(range of possible scores, 5 - 30), 50 service use during the previous 6 months using the Service Assessment for Children and Adolescents51 adapted to incorporate items assessing mental health treatment by primary care clinicians, 52 and satisfaction with mental health care using a 5 - point scale ranging from very dissatisfied (1) to very satisfied (5).53 CIDI diagnoses of major depression and dysthymia were evaluated at baseline and follow - up.

Any answer that has wording like «great deal of confidence» was associated with a question that had 3 or 5 point scale ranging from «none» to «a great deal» of confidence.

Teachers answered these questions for each of the six assessment categories (performance, standardized, teacher - designed, commercial, fluency and understanding, word attack / word meaning) using a five - point scale ranging from «1» (strong negative impact) to «5» (strong positive impact).

The first item asked teachers to rate students in terms of their attentiveness on a four - point scale ranging from never attentive to attentive all of the time.

The psychologists rated the mother's affection and attention level on a five - point scale ranging from «negative» to «extravagant.»

Researchers measured participants» emotional distress with the Distress Thermometer, an 11 - point scale ranging from 0 (no distress) to 10 (extreme distress).

Employees answered 30 questions using a six - point scale ranging from Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree.

Participants rated their use of each coping strategy on a 4 - point scale range from 1 (I haven't been doing this at all) to 4 (I've been doing this a lot).

Seventeen items (e.g., «daydreams», and «is demanding») were rated on six - point scales ranging from never (1) to always (6).

Not exact matches

That's a small numerical shift on a five - point scale, and yet that shift actually puts a woman back into a normal range of her peers.

Data shows that while participants in larger plans clearly benefit from scale, some small plans managed to pay significantly less in costs than others: costs for plans in the $ 1 million to $ 10 million segment ranged widely, from 68 basis points to 153 basis points.

As proposed in point 3, the definition of «Intensive Animal Husbandry» must exclude small - scale, low stocking density, free - range farms, and any buffers should be developed in collaboration with the local community on a case - by - case basis.

We transformed the scales to the range of 0 — 100 points; higher scores indicated better knowledge or improved behaviours.

Women were asked how they felt about breastfeeding during the first week after birth on a 5 - point Likert scale ranging from «disliked very much» to «liked very much.»

Using neutron scattering experiments at the BER II research reactor, Manfred Reehuis and Michael Tovar were successful in determining the structural and magnetic properties for each of the mixed crystal specimens over quite a wide temperature range, from near the zero point of the Kelvin temperature scale to above 900 K.

Before and after, the subjects rated the scenarios on a seven - point scale, ranging from morally forbidden to morally permissible.

He points out that this magnetic signal can be associated with large - scale processes of mountain formation, and how these ranges can be curved until they create structures known as oroclines: «With a rock sample, we can analyse a process that has occurred on the tectonic plate level; and, specifically, offers new data that allows us to discover how this orogeny or large Variscan range and its curvature occurred.