Sentences with phrase «point statements about»

For each experience, include three to five bullet - point statements about how you applied your skills and affected a task or project.

Under all his job titles, especially his most recent one where he got fired, Brent wrote strong bullet point statements about relevant achievements with quantifiable results.

These monuments, then, not only represented reverence for soldiers who fought in a war to defend slavery, they also made a very pointed statement about the rule of white supremacy: All who enter the courthouse are subject to the laws of white men.

On Thursday, the European commission issued a pointed statement about the Danish referendum, saying co-operation on cross-border serious and organised crime and international terrorism «must not in any way equal full membership of Europol».

MUG is a fine film that gets the drama right, the comedy right, and makes some pointed statements about religion and our collective obsession with the way we look.

By contrast, many artists working in the 1990s and since, Glenn Ligon and Lorna Simpson among them, have used pictures and text to examine the past and make pointed statements about race.

Recent exhibitions include Nancy Chunn's topical «Chicken Little and the Culture of Fear,» which uses bright animated colors to make pointed statements about police states.

Not exact matches

On Wednesday afternoon, the benchmark U.S. 10 - year bond was yielding 2.35 per cent, up 15 basis points from before the Fed statement and up sharply from about 1.6 per cent at the beginning of May.

At some point during the launch of your startup, it's likely that a potential investor will ask you about your company's mission statement.

Martinez pointed to Section 17 (a) of the Securities Act and Section 10 (b) and Rule 10b - 5 of the Securities Exchange Act — which forbid misrepresentations in the course of security sales — as potential dangers for Mayweather and others who make glib or inaccurate statements about ICOs.

«Qualcomm has confirmed publicly that this lawsuit against our clients is intended to make a point about Apple and punish our clients for working with Apple,» Theodore J. Boutrous, a lawyer for the four companies, said in a statement.

Carlson played clips of hosts Anderson Cooper and host Brooke Baldwin, who had both pointed out on recent shows that Brazile made false statements about giving Hillary Clinton's campaign questions before a CNN town hall.

Disney declined to address my report, instead pointing to previous statements released about Disney Infinity.

Just this weekend, he echoed that statement, with a more direct jab at Facebook, following the Cambridge Analytica revelations, telling the audience at a conference in China, «The ability of anyone to know what you've been browsing about for years, who your contacts are, who their contacts are, things you like and dislike and every intimate detail of your life — from my own point of view it shouldn't exist.»

The Capital One ® Venture ® Rewards Credit Card also boasts a 50,000 point signup bonus, worth about $ 500 in travel statement credits.

A spokesman for Pershing Square said declined to comment other than to point to its proxy statement, which didn't mention the talk about Ackman's ability to cause media coverage but did say Ackman told ADP it was in the company's interest to avoid the distraction of a board fight.

In making this statement about «me being me» he is channeling a point made by people like Bill Gurley about the importance of sometimes being a contrarian if you want to outperform a market.

Like ME II and I have pointed out, it does not matter whether the slave was a slave voluntarily or otherwise, mostly because the passage quoted by ME II also does not focus on why the slave is a slave, but a blanket statement about them all.

You cut through the modern politics and hand waving and what you have is that for at LEAST 200 years and probably more (longer than we've been around as a country) Christians were «held in contempt» to the point that for about 10 of those years several emperors pursued active policies of extermination (that's what the «actually persecuting» statement refers to - think holocaust type policies) that included some of the worst type of tortures known to humanity.

Okay, so to prove my point about the mo rons and fools, these statements (shown below) about my comment shows total lack of understanding and certainly an absence of gray matter between the ears.

Thus, in Jesus statement, he points to the fact that he was indeed primarily concerned about spiritual poverty.

I was simply pointing out the OP's fallacious statement about primitive people and the bible.

I have often wondered how to reconcile Jesus» statement about not letting anyone call you «Master» or «Teacher» and the statements about the «positions» of elder and deacon in Paul's letters, and, as you point out, Paul's «title» of apostle.

His statements about priest and king being bound to the land and the people ultimately point back toward a view that sees social and moral responsibility for the common welfare as stemming from a prior relational view of human persons.

More to the point, the context speaks about confession of faith and love of one another — are these regulative statements or just as conveniently non-binding on you, someone who clearly does not take much joy in the fact that the bible * instituted * ecclesial offices?

It will have been noted that in its windy statement about RE in the English baccalaureate, the CES doesn't point to RE as being a way in to religious faith: that wouldn't be of much interest to the government, of course, but it ought to be for Catholics.

Ok detective you have the four witnesses and they gave their written statement about Jesus aka Jesus Christ, aka the savior, aka messiah, aka the truth, aka the life, aka the lamb of God, etc et al, and you have pointed out the differences in the accounts.

It's not a blanket statement about atheists, its an extreme example to emphasize the point of the comment.

you posted this earlier, and as i pointed out then you are just as guilty of sweeping statements, with the «majority of democrats» claim, that you are moaning about.

As The Hollywood Reporter pointed out, it's not the first time Morrissey has made high - profile statements about his veganism.

What is incredibly annoying about this statement is that the writer seems to think he needs to point out being one of the «least religious» colleges is somehow «dubious».

then i pointed out that your basic statement is self - refuting — in that it does the very thing you are complaining about.

There are four affirmations about Jesus Christ that historically have been stressed in Christian faith: (1) Jesus is truly human, bone of our bone and flesh of our flesh, living a human life under the same human conditions any one of us faces — thus Christology, statement of the significance of Jesus, must start «from below,» as many contemporary theologians are insisting; (2) Jesus is that one in whom God energizes in a supreme degree, with a decisive intensity; in traditional language he has been styled «the Incarnate Word of God»; (3) for our sake, to secure human wholeness of life as it moves onward toward fulfillment, Jesus not only lived among us but also was crucified for us — this is the point of talk about atonement wrought in and by him; (4) death was not the end for him, so it is not as if he never existed at all; in some way he triumphed over death, or was given victory over it, so that now and forever he is a reality in the life of God and effective among humankind.

His point was not to deny (or affirm) whether nature comes from a creator but only that such a statement explains nothing about the mechanism by which species are transformed over time.

Christians will trump Jesus» words with just about any other character they can — however opposite it is from his simple statements — to validate a point.

In defense of this idea, they point to Paul's statements in Romans 9:6 - 13 that «they are not all Israel who are of Israel» and Romans 11:1 - 4 about the remnant of Israel which God has always reserved for Himself through «the election of grace» (Rom 11:5).

(Incidentally, since Azumah has singled out the PC (USA), I would point to the various statements that the denomination has made about the problematic ways that sexuality is treated in contemporary society to remind him that there is no more a single «Western perspective» on matters of sexuality than there is a single African perspective on matters of homosexuality.)

This statement reflects the fact that you know nothing about the Bible and to that point I hope you receive the due penalty that you deserve.

Two comments about this third point: First, the statement of this requirement is evidence that neither the concept of God in general nor the conception of the consequent nature of God is ad hoc to Whitehead's system.

«Contrary to comments by GLSEN falsely labeling the Day of Truth as «inappropriate and divisive,» the event was always about the right of students to peacefully express their point of view on the subject of homosexual behavior,» the statement said.

Pantin, in discussing such statements, points out that almost everything that Schroedinger has said about life could at least in some measure be said about a thunderstorm.

As a last point in these thoughts about Leonardo Boff's notion of the Trinity, seen in the perspective of an ecumenical hermeneutics between contextuality and catholicity, I shall ask once more about the status and quality of a statement on the Trinity.

However, a few points must be made about this statement:

My posts from today and the next few days will be about your first point, that doctrinal statements lead to judging others.

As he points out, Romney technically did not contradict his earlier statements about the HHS mandate, and considering that the debate moderator was....

This thinker, whose name I shall not disclose, said that he was becoming more and more convinced that there was «something in the older metaphysical — he called them «ontological» — claims; at the moment he was much concerned, he said, to find a way of giving more than linguistic status to such propositions as «personal God», for it appeared to him that these statements somehow pointed to a truth about the universe, about the nature of things, that must be reckoned with in any honest description of the «way things are».

At this point Whitehead produces his oft - cited statement about empirical support «both from the evidence for peculiar instances of telepathy, and from the instinctive apprehension of a tone of feeling in ordinary social intercourse» (PR 469).

I will respond to your very first point only: your question about my statement «Jesus is the Gospel.»

Perhaps the point of Jesus» question was not to make a general statement about natural disasters, but rather to evoke a response similar to that of the Pharisees, who after being asked a similar question, turned and dropped their stones.

But the point I was trying to make is, I think making sweeping statements about «The Church» is like talking about «the atheists» or «the homosexuals» — it's a damaging stereotype that ignores the diversity within.