That should
point the temperature further in the correct direction for the next cool down.
Not exact matches
(And once again, you can see that this
temperature fell
far below the smoke
point for EVOO.)
Some archaea — a domain of microbial life that was little understood when the Viking landers reached their destination — live in even more extreme situations, flourishing in
temperatures far above the boiling
point of water and surviving in thick brine.
In orbit at Earth's second Lagrange
point (L2),
far from the help of a terrestrial doctor, Webb will use its near - infrared camera (NIRCam) instrument to help align its primary mirror segments about 40 days after launch, once they have unfolded from their unaligned stowed position and cooled to their operating
temperatures.
Lead author of the study, Dr Michael de Podesta, said: The
further away one measures from the
temperature of the triple
point of water, the harder it gets to precisely determine the ratio of exactly how much hotter or colder the
temperature is than the standard
temperature.
For the first time, using sophisticated tools to measure skin color, blood flow, and
temperature, researchers found that patients on the drug who had a very rapid onset of flushing — redness, pain, swelling, and heat to the face — rated the experience
far more harshly than patients whose skin changed gradually, even to the
point of extreme redness or change in
temperature over time.
Temperatures are 35 °C warmer than normal for the time of year at Greenland's most northerly
point, Cape Morris Jesup, says Robert Rohde of Berkeley Earth in California, and the site has already spent more time above 0 °C so
far this year than in any complete year on record.
As frigid as such
temperature may sound, it outperforms by
far traditional superconductors, which operate at closer to -270 degrees celsius, or a few degrees from absolute zero — the
point where all motion stops.»
Further to Douglas Hoyt's
point about possible errors in the surface
temperature record.
Brown noted that the
temperatures could dip even lower — we have never observed Pluto at its
farthest point from the Sun.
Olive oil is a seemingly healthier, slightly less common option but has a smoke
point of 350 degrees, which is a
far lower
temperature than most stovetop or oven cooking takes place at.
If a larger mass of warm air has to pass through it, more energy is transferred, through the evaporator's fins (so that even the evaporator's design and, in particular, its exchange surface play an important part) from the air to the liquid refrigerant allowed inside it by the TEV or orifice tube so it expands more and, along with the absolute pressure inside the evaporator, the refrigerant's vapor superheat (the delta between the boiling
point of the fluid at a certain absolute pressure and the
temperature of the vapour) increases, since after expanding into saturated vapour, it has enough time to catch enough heat to warm up
further by vaporizing the remaining liquid (an important property of a superheated vapour is that no fluid in the liquid state is carried around by the vapour, unlike with saturated vapour).
Vegetable oils do not have the heat tolerance that engine oils do, the smoke
point for refined almond oil, which is the highest heat tolerance cooking oil I can think of is 270C, your average vegetable oil is going to be
far less than that, closer to 210 - 220C, both are lower than the
temperatures they will face in the engine
With 755 horsepower the 2019 Chevrolet Corvette zr1 is the most powerful Corvette ever it's also the most technologically advanced behind me are the rolling s's at Road Atlanta and we're here to see if we can reach to the supercar levels of performance afforded by this thing's massive power big tires and the tall wing on the back after that we'll take to the streets to see if a car this powerful can behave itself in public this is a monster of a car I've had some brief track opportunities moving this morning to get used to the pace of this machine which is phenomenal we're gonna warm up as we get out to the road Atlanta and sort of build up to the pace that this car can operate at now initially when you hop in this car you have this shrine to the engine right above you you see the line of the hood it kind of dominates the center of the view you can see over it it doesn't affect visibility but it's immediately obvious and that kind of speaks to what makes this car special it's a monster of an engine listen to that [Music] that is tremendous tremendous acceleration and incredible power but what I finding so
far my brief time here at the Atlanta is that everything else in the car is rut has risen to match hurt me while I lay into it on the back straight look you know 150 mile - an - hour indicated we're going to ease up a little bit on it because I need to focus on talking rather than driving but like I was saying the attributes of the rest of the car the steering the braking capability the grip every system of this car is riding to the same level of the power and I think that's what makes it really impressive initially this is undoubtedly a mega mega fast car but it's one that doesn't terrify you with its performance potential there's a level of electronic sophistication that is unparalleled at this price
point but it's hard not to get you know totally slipped away by the power of this engine so that's why I keep coming back to it this car has an electronically controlled limited slip differential it has shocks filled with magnetically responsive fluid that can react faster to inputs and everything this car has a super sophisticated stability control system that teaches you how to drive it quick but also makes you go faster we haven't even gotten into exploring it yet because the limits of this car are so high that frankly it takes a while to grow into it but [Music] I think what's impressive about this car is despite how fast it is it is approachable you can buy this car to track dates with it and grow with it as a driver and as an owner I think that's a really special [Music] because you will never be more talented than this car is fast ever unless you are a racing driver casually grazing under 50 miles an hour on this straight okay I'm just going to enjoy driving this now [Music][Applause][Music] this particular Corvette zr1 comes with the cars track performance package a lot of those changes happen underneath the sheet metal but one of the big differences that is immediately obvious is this giant carbon fiber wing now the way this thing is mounted is actually into the structure of the vehicle and it makes you know loading the rear hatch a bit more difficult but we're assuming that's okay if you're looking for the track performance this thing delivers also giving you that performance are these Michelin Pilot Sport cup tires which are basically track oriented tires that you can drive on the street but as we wake our way to the front of the thing what really matters is what's under the hood that's right there's actually a hole in the hood of this thing and that's because this engine is so tall it's tall because it has a larger supercharger and a bunch of added cooling on it to help it you know keep at the right
temperature the supercharger is way larger than the one on the zo six and it has a more cooling capacity and the downside is it's taller so it pops literally through the hood the cool thing is from the top you can actually see this shake when you're looking at it from you know a camera from the top of the vehicle this all makes for 755 horsepower making this the most powerful Corvette ever now what's important about that is this not just the power but likewise everything in the car has to be built to accommodate and be able to drive to the level of speed this thing can develop that's why you had the massive cooling so I had the aerodynamics and that's why I had the electronic sophistication inside [Applause] we had a lot of time to take this car on the track yesterday and I've had the night to think about things Matt today two crews on the road and see how this extreme performance machine deals with the sort of more civil minded stuff of street driving the track impressions remain this thing is unquestionably one of the most capable cars you can get from a dealer these days a lot of that's besides the
point now because we're on the street we have speed limits they have the ever - present threat of law enforcement around every corner so the question is what does this car feel like in public when you slow this car down it feels like a more powerful Corvette you don't get much tram lining from these big wheels though we as the front end doesn't want to follow grooves in the pavement it is louder it is a little firmer but it's certainly livable on a day to day basis that's surprising for a vehicle of this capability normally these track oriented cars are so hardcore that you wouldn't want to drive them to the racetrack but let's face it you spend more time driving to the track than you do on the track and the fact that this thing works well in both disciplines is really impressive I can also dial everything back and cruise and not feel like I'm getting punished for driving a hardcore track machine that's a that's a really nice accomplishment that's something that you won't find in cars that are this fast and costs maybe double this much the engine in this car dominates the entire experience you can't miss the engine and the whole friend this car is sort of a shrine to it the way it pops out of the hood the way it's covered with coolers around the sides it is the experience of this car and that does make driving this thing special and also the fact that it doesn't look half bad either in fact I think it has some of the coolest looking wheels currently available on a new car this car as we mentioned this car has the track package the track package on this car gives you what they call competition bucket seats which are a little wide for my tastes but I'm you know not the widest person in the world this automatic transmission works well I mean there's so much torque again out of this engine that it can be very smooth and almost imperceptible its clunky on occasion I think I'd might opt for the manual although Chevy tells me about 80 % of its customers will go for the automatic I don't think they're gonna be disappointed and that's gonna be the faster transmission drag strip on the street - and on the racetrack man it was a little bit more satisfying to my taste though we've talked about the exhaust I have it set in the track setting let's quiet it down a little bit so you can hear the difference now I've set that separately from everything else so let's put it stealth what happened to the engine sound that's pretty that's pretty amazing man stealth is really stealth and then go back to track Wow actually a really big difference that's that's pretty great the Corvette has always been a strong value proposition and nowhere is that more evident than this zr1 giving you a nearly unbeatable track performance per dollar now the nice thing is on the road this doesn't feel like a ragged edge track machine either you could genuinely drive it every day the compromises are few and that's what makes this car so special if you like what you see keep it tuned right here and be sure to visit Edmunds.com [Music]
As
far as the
temperature control goes though, for me, getting rid of blue light and going all orange & whatnot isn't the
point... for one thing, Trump has made me * hate * orange and I don't want to be reminded of him when I'm reading.
Chris O'Neill, If you think a graph of GISTEMP since 1880 is in any way empirical proof that there is a human component to the increasing global
temperature then there is no
point discussing
further
When this
point is reached convection starts and effectively prevents the
temperature gradient from increasing
further.
If you think a graph of GISTEMP since 1880 is in any way empirical proof that there is a human component to the increasing global
temperature then there is no
point discussing
further.
And yes, the association between
temperature and sea level is well established, but once again this relationship is beside the
point as
far as the influence of CO2 emissions is concerned.
There are alternatives to our proposition of a -0.2 K
temperature offset — which seems a bit large against the apparent quality of this reconstruction, even this
far back — but they would be speculative at this
point.
I particularly enjoyed the slides that, when combined (1) provided an overview of hotter and cooler CO2 molecules as it relates to how they are seen from outer space and from profile — because this will make it easier for me to explain this process to others; (2) walked through the volcanic and solar activity vs assigning importance to CO2 changes — because this another way to help make it clearer, too, but in another way; (3) discussed CO2 induced warming and ocean rise vs different choices we might make — because this helps
point out why every day's delay matters; and (4) showed Figure 1 from William Nordhaus» «Strategies for Control of Carbon Dioxide» and then super-imposed upon that the global mean
temperature in colors showing pre-paper and post-paper periods — because this helps to show just how
far back it was possible to make reasoned projections without the aid of a more nuanced and modern understanding.
Another
point: during the Cretaceous the level of CO2 in the atmosphere was many times current and
temperatures were
far higher.
point triumphantly to the cosmic microwave background
temperature of the last century and declarethat warming impossible on the grounds that it's only 4.6 Kelvin in all directions as
far as you can look.
I also
pointed you to data for Arctic
temperature which shows that it has warmed considerably over just the last decade, so that presently the Arctic is
far warmer than it ever was in the 20th century.
Now if you stop emitting immediately at this
point, of course global
temperature will rise
further.
The actual «Wiki» answer is here:» Oranges are sensitive to frost, and a common treatment to prevent frost damage when sub-freezing
temperatures are expected, is to spray the trees with water, since as long as unfrozen water is turning to ice on the trees» branches, the ice that has formed stays just at the freezing
point, giving protection even if air
temperatures have dropped
far lower.
With a global year - to - date
temperature that is 2.05 °F (1.14 °C) above the 20th century average by NOAA's reckoning —
far warmer than this
point last year — 2016 is poised to become the warmest year on record.
Multiple people have
pointed out to him that the mere fact that Venus is warmer than Mercury despite being
farther from the sun, and that Earth is warmer than the moon, despite being the same distance from the sun, show conclusively that atmospheres do in fact result in warmer surface
temperatures via the greenhouse effect.
At some
point, they get to where any increase in forcing is matched by a corresponding increase in the opposing forces, so there's no
further temperature rise, and the sensitivity goes to zero.
Recent modelling suggests that the mutually reinforcing effects of increasing
temperatures and aridity, forest fires and deforestation could bring the rainforest
far closer than previously thought to «tipping
points» at which it becomes ecologically unviable.
Further, it is
pointed out that the enhancement of carbon sinks is already included in the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change agreements, and, moreover, that IPCC projections rely on unspecified negative emissions (often inappropriately assumed to be implausibly large deployments of Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS)-RRB- to prevent high probabilities of
temperature rises exceeding 2oC.
Nevertheless, at a certain
point atmospheric
temperature rises along with pressure and
far exceeds NASA's blackbody prediction of 226.6 Kelvin for Venus.
A great many of these events begin at
temperature ranges
far above the freezing
point (though
temperatures on the ground can drop precipitously as the nucleation process unfolds).
In past times when atmospheric CO2 and
temperature were
far higher, there were no tipping
points, climate disasters or runaway greenhouse.
The
point being, once the
temperature of the «Earth» is such that Iup = 1.25 * Iin (in my example), then everything is self - consistent: 80 % of that upward flux, which is exactly 0.8 * 1.25 * Iin = Iin, passes through the glass, and goes away; since that exactly matches Iin, no
further thermal energy accumulates inside the enclosure.
Such «ice balls» have even formed on lake water that was 40 degrees, how is this possible at
temperatures far above the normal freezing
point?
That is, they fear that global
temperatures will exceed a tipping
point that will trigger a release of stored carbon from the biosphere, an event that would cause
further rapid climate change.
Hi Bart, Could I just
point out that Ocean Heat Content, given that the oceans represent the largest thermal mass involved in the climate system by
far, is the right metric to use as a bellweather for future surface
temperature trends.
Simply put the climate change debate is strictly whether it is changes to the incoming or outgoing energy that is causing a shift in the equilibrium
temperature and all evidence
points to the fact that it is the changes to the incoming energy that is by
far the dominant driver with changes to the outgoing energy from the enhanced greenhouse effect too insignificant to even be detected.
As to CO2 in the atmosphere warming the planet,
far greater concentrations in the past hasn't stopped the Earth's surface
temperature from falling a few thousand degrees in the last four and a half billion years, to its present tolerably comfortable
point.
One of the most interesting things about the climate debate is that in one place it involves people arguing about
point A (in this case sensitivity), by assuming that B is well known (in this case
temperature change), while not
far away people are hotly debating B. Most of AGW science, including F&G, is based on assuming that the surface statistical model means are facts.
Better still before KR kindly
pointed to that graph, I had broken down and endeavoured to digitize the
FAR graphs myself and reference
temperature trends over the period prior to 1985 from the
FAR graphs.
Ergo, not withstanding all the
points raised above, the IPCC
FAR projections have not in fact been falsified - even without adjustments to use historical forcing data, and even ignoring the fact that it was not intended as a projection of future
temperatures (but only of the GHG impact on future
temperatures).
Ice mass balance buoys deployed in the Beaufort Sea as part of the Office of Naval Research (ONR) Marginal Ice Zone Program indicate that surface
temperatures have reached the melting
point, at least intermittently, in the region, with some surface melt beginning in the southern part of the Beaufort, but little or no melt
farther north (Figure 10), http://www.apl.washington.edu/project/project.php?id=miz.
Bottom line is if there were no greenhouse gases in the atmosphere like on the moon, daytime high
temperatures at the equator in the spring and fall would exceed the boiling
point of water and of course nighttime
temperatures would plunge
far below freezing.
This comment has already gotten too long, but I'd like to
point out that based on what we know so
far, it looks very much as if Salby is making the same mistake that McLean made (in attributing the
temperature rise to ENSO) and, even more similarly, that Mr Lon Hocker made in a post at WUWT in which he made virtually the identical argument to this one (
temperature changes explain the atmospheric CO2 trend).
The relationship between proxies and
temperature is weak and the number of proxies is
far larger than the number of target data
points.»
The dust −
temperature relationships for the Southern Ocean and Chinese Loess are shown in Fig. 3 B and C. To
further minimize possible issues connected with time scales, data uncertainty, and uneven data distribution across
temperature ranges, we collect the dust deposition −
temperature data
points for each data set combination in Fig. 3 into four bins (see Materials and Methods).
The final step, as yet
far from completion, is to measure the actual
temperature and concentration of each molecule at each
point in the atmosphere — including methane, ozone, aerosols and much more.
Further, even if the temperature moved outside this range, you could point further back an
Further, even if the
temperature moved outside this range, you could
point further back an
further back and say..