Sentences with phrase «point the way rather»

I'm not expecting anyone to hold my hand along the way, but sure is better when others point the way rather than pound.

Not exact matches

Rather than pointing a finger at a co-worker, in 2015, acknowledge your part and then communicate your message in a clear, nonjudgmental way.

What some experts are doing is putting up a straw man, pointing to those extreme cases in which some people let the development of the business plan become an end in itself — something that gets in the way of business rather than helping to optimize it.

Mnangagwa's firing was a seminal event, as it pointed — rather explicitly — to the Mugabes» effort to eliminate from the top levels of the ZANU - PF anyone who stood in the way of Grace Mugabe's path to the presidency.

Rather, «check online savings accounts, community banks or credit unions, often you can pick up an additional full percentage point that way,» McBride said.

The point being that, rather than packaging and boxing each park in the same way, each one gets to carve its own path to Landon.

Rather than just a gadget event, MWC is proving to be the meeting point where new and better ways of connecting people and things are coming to fruition.

This could manifest itself in several different ways, but a key point is to rent out rather than sell the high - tax state property and buy a place in a lower - tax place outright, and give it a year first.

Rather than simply create a kind of virtual points system in which the points can eventually be converted into «real» money — or used to buy goods, the way that frequent - flier points and other quasi-currencies (such as «Canadian Tire money») can — the founders of Bitcoin want to create a completely separate and virtual monetary system.

«At one point I recognized that Warren Buffett, though he had every advantage in learning from Ben Graham, did not copy Ben Graham, but rather set out on his own path, and ran money his way, by his own rules...» I have just quickly glanced at Bronte Capital's blog post, but I am sure Todd Combs and Ted Weschler were not hired because they lived and died by Buffet's word but rather because they manifested the teachings of value investing in their own styles.

For me as a Calvinist, that suggests that rather than spending a lot of time defending the doctrine of total depravity or of election I would do best to share my deeply felt sense of my own unworthiness, and to point people to the way in which I have experienced God's gracious workings in my life.

So, the deity, rather than just letting A&E go about their merry way and letting them bask in its glory instead points out the very tree that would be their downfall.

I go on to point out that this in no way limits the participation of all members of the church, but rather expands and magnifies it.

When someone is accused of «cherry - picking» verses from the Bible, it means that they have a particular doctrine or idea they want to teach to others, and rather than considering «the whole counsel of God,» they pick a choose a few select verses from various books of the Bible which seems to prove their point or present their case in the strongest possible way.

It would seem Jesus was pointing in a rather spectacular way to the coming into the world of the power of the Kingdom and this will remain until the end of time.

Sometimes the distinctions were rather artificially drawn; yet their point is clear — ancient Christian thinkers knew that the Bible could be read in different ways and for different purposes.

The common habit of using the Bible by concentrating on one verse at a time (which may or may not be a complete sentence) is at best a very slow, plodding way to get at the author's main points, rather like playing dominoes or checkers at the rate of one or two moves per day or per week, and at worst a fragmentation and distortion.

In representing the Torah, then, Jesus in no way creates a new possibility for human obedience; he points, rather, to God's primordial will — ever perceptible in human experience — for which humanity has always been responsible.

Rather than point out what I believe to be his sins, I will look for what I can find of God's image in him, and will honor him in every way I can.

But Hartshorne effectively replies that, even if finite beings depend for their existence on the creative activity of God, it still remains true that if God had created a different world then He would have been somewhat different from the way He actually is by virtue of the fact that His perfect knowledge would have been of that world rather than of this world; and so the point still holds that divine cognitive relations to the creatures are partially constitutive of God.7

And he offered his thesis as a way of keeping the direction of inquiry open rather than closing it at the point at which the origin of laws are accepted as ultimately unexplained.

There are other scholars who defend the substantial historicity of the tomb pericope, and since we must reckon with this possibility, we now turn from the literary form of the story to its content to see in what way the latter may point to historical reliability rather than to legend.

The last point may be made in another way — by asserting that a healthy concept of cleanliness is primarily positive rather than negative.

Rather, I hope to respond rather than review — and I will hopefully make my points from the scriptures in a way that is heRather, I hope to respond rather than review — and I will hopefully make my points from the scriptures in a way that is herather than review — and I will hopefully make my points from the scriptures in a way that is helpful.

Melanie Philips, in The Daily Mail, pointed to the way in which «as so often, [the BBC] has given undue airtime to extremists, thus lending credence to the false impression of the Pope's remarks», and she criticised the way the BBC had claimed that the Pope had «apologised», rather than simply expressing regret for the misinterpretation of his comments, «thus helping Islamic extremists believe that the forces of intimidation had cowed the Pontiff and scored a notable victory in the war against Western civilisation».

It is a way of pointing out the rather extraordinary fact that the primary and really convincing evidence which Christians claim to discover for the reality and power of God for them is in their relation to Jesus.

A lot of people agonise over the way a particular church may define «self» and «other» — but it seems to me that both they and whichever church are rather missing the point.

It is because I seek after facts (rather than after «a sign» in the sense of the sort of evident manifestation which I agree with him it would be radically wrong to seek) that I look for a publicly observable state of affairs in the spatial and temporal world, not disclosing, nor containing, but still pointing towards (in a way that I agree remains entirely ambivalent) that which is, in my view, necessarily unique and creative.

«Rather, like Montaigne, he denies man's right to scan the ways of God or to assume that God's will coincides at any point with his own.

In my opinion, the inherited lines of division may give way to new ones that more usefully point to the issues of the twenty - first century rather than to those of the nineteenth.

The point is to drill students in specific behaviors rather than to engage them in deep, critical reflection about certain ways of being.»

Is this any more than a rather romantic way of pointing to the traditional difficulty of speaking about the holy God in human terms?

The Protestant will regard specific norms, in the moral sphere, even in the form in which they appear in scripture, rather as a sort of sign - post pointing out the way to meet and endure the ever new situations of the personal life of faith, with a critical attitude towards oneself and one's hidden sinfulness.

Jürgen Moltmann has pointed out that one amazing ramification of Christianity's peculiar doctrine of the Trinity is the way it transcends the patriarchalism implicit in Jewish monotheism as well as the matriarchalism implicit in pagan pantheism.49 Using sexual terms in a metasexual rather than a literal, genital, and bodily sense, the feminine dimension of personality refers to the receptive, passive, self - effacing, care - receiving capacity in us all that contrasts with the initiating, aggressive, self - assertive, self - sufficient traits we associate with the masculine dimension.

I don't find that I agree completely with your points, because I think that they are ways in which the original idea of the group system has been corrupted, be that through dishonesty, works theology etc., rather than a fundamental issue with the system in general.

Putting it that way is just describing it from a different viewpoint; or rather, viewing point.

His point seems to be to start a conversation, to identify patterns of discernment so that we are aware of them, rather than trying to insist that there is one right way to discern.

Father Schofield guides us skilfully through this rather complex theological debate, noting some interesting points along the way.

One way to contrast archaic and modern society, or rather the modern West and all traditional societies, archaic or historic, is to point out, as Louis Dumont following Alexis de Tocqueville has been doing in recent years, that traditional societies are characterized by hierarchy whereas modern societies are characterized by equality — at least in ideal.6 This contrast is rooted not just in political ideology but in fundamental conceptions of the nature of reality.

Though the curtain of secrecy is drawn over such meetings (one of the abuses that Boff had criticized in his writings), Boff emerged from the encounter smiling, believing that he had made the point that, when dealing with liberation theology, the church ought to consult people directly involved in the struggle, rather than relying solely on European theologians who, as he told reporters, «look on poverty from the outside, from a position of security, in a paternalistic way.»

It is that way of knowing a thing which proceeds «by going all around it,» by relating it to other known reference points, rather than by «entering into it» (CM 159).

The way you argue buttresses my point that most fans argue from points of ignorance rather than facts and knowledge.

Los Merengues need to step things up in a big way soon, or their form will continue to deteriorate to the point where they'll have to fight just to make the Champions League next season — and with just a one - point cushion on fifth place coming into this match, their fight for that relevance may be coming sooner rather than later.

They'd rather wait for the one time it fails so they can bash You blame the manager for being favourist yet a fellow blogger praising a player he previously bashed is called being two faced You kill Ramsey for a blind pass attempting to enter the opposition final third yet you won't blame Sanchez for turning over the ball in a pointless dribble with three free team mates You kill metersacker for deflecting a shot into his own net but won't touch kos for getting out of the way of a shot he could have sufficiency blocked You claim with no substantial proof that arteta, mert, Ramsey, can not lead arsenal anywhere substantial yet they have each at a point been a massive cause for stability and progress when called upon Even after reading this comment, you will ignore the fact that kos was awful until partnerd with mert, our defensive mid with song leaked more goals than the one with arteta and we've struggled to win without him at least until late last season.

we have owner who are content filling their pocket and care less about winning titles so they keep a manager who is well past his sell by date and who is more interested in proving a point and leaving a legacy of doing things a certain way rather than doing the right things to win....

Put differently, the way this are turning out in the DM position points to the prudence of keeping both Arteta and Flamini rather than follow your argument during the transfer window.

& if they do drop 2 or 3 points against Man U Yellow card for either Matic or Fabregas then they get a suspension (although I'd rather beat them at full strength) Then we beat them 3 points dropped Win there game in hand against Leicester I think they'll drop points against Liverpool and or Crystal Palace the way there playing so say they win one lose one.

Finally, and to reiterate an earlier point, the way forward for this club is to stop paying below average bench players so much money and to focus the bulk of the weekly wages on establishing a dominant starting 11... this will require the club to eat some wages in order to ship some players out, get rid of any deadwood over the age of 21, develop a cutting edge scouting service and put your money where your mouth is for once... I would much rather have a starting 11 that was world - class and give some reasonably paid young blue - chippers playing time when injuries occur than have 2 or 3 world class players surrounded by a plethora of overpaid and underwhelming players... management would no longer be able to sell their half - baked plans to the fans under the guise of «winning now», which any intelligent fan knows is a crap - shoot at best, and instead create a a squad that provides hope for the present and the future... this is exactly the model that has been used by Barcelona, Real & Bayern, so it should be good enough for us... by the way, until Messi & Ronaldo re-signed just recently all 3 clubs weekly wages were on par with ours... think about that for a second or two

It wasn't the win — which as you point out was expected — but rather the way we won that has got folks excited.

In some ways, my escalation of commitment / support for Arsenal has kind of ruined my enjoyment of the Premier League more generally, with rooting for the other top teams to drop points rather than enjoying the artistry of the players.