Sentences with phrase «point they have in common»

The final point they have in common: they surround themselves with expert advisors they trust and can call upon.

Not exact matches

As I was finishing this read, I realized that there were three things that all of the people that I have read about had in common, and that these points were actually signs that they were becoming successful.

The mega-chain's creation myth does have some plot points in common with The Social Network: while McDonald's retains the names of its founders, the McDonald's brothers, it was Kroc who realized the potential of fast food and spread the chain from coast - to - coast, eventually buying out the brothers.

It's common knowledge at this point that KFC's chicken is coated in a secret blend of 11 herbs and spices, and the Colonel's nephew may have just revealed exactly which ones.

John 12:8 is the most common example: «You always have the poor with you...» Left out of that (mis) interpretation is the fact that Jesus is actually quoting a passage from Jewish Scripture that makes the opposite point: The continual existence of the poor serves as the fundamental reason for God's command to assist them, to give «liberally and ungrudgingly»: «Open your hand to the poor and needy neighbor in your land.»

In court documents filed with the Northern California District Court on Thursday, Uber argued that the class - action part of the suit should be dropped because the 160,000 drivers, «have little or nothing in common, other than their use of the Uber App in California at some point over the past six years.&raquIn court documents filed with the Northern California District Court on Thursday, Uber argued that the class - action part of the suit should be dropped because the 160,000 drivers, «have little or nothing in common, other than their use of the Uber App in California at some point over the past six years.&raquin common, other than their use of the Uber App in California at some point over the past six years.&raquin California at some point over the past six years.»

After devoting a solid 15 pages of his letter on how the U.S. should slash regulations, Dimon made a point to single out a single area of government oversight that has undeniable value: «Some regulations quite clearly create a common good (e.g., clean air and water),» Dimon noted, in a sentence that went on to catalog the ways regulation is otherwise bad for the economy — making it all the more striking that he chose to highlight environmental issues.

Instead, Facebook's PR team and lower ranking leaders have led the company's defense by drawing technical distinctions between what happened and more common breaches by hackers, and by pointing out that Facebook curtailed the amount of user data it shared with app makers in 2014.

Whether it's in startup mode, or has reached a more mature and established point in the development cycle, successful businesses have five factors in common:

J.P. Morgan's provision for compensating employees who leave to serve in government — a practice so common on Wall Street that it has become known as the proverbial «revolving door» — has become a point of contention in recent years, not only at the bank but for the industry as a whole.

As you can tell, both the points above have one theme in common: customer - centricity.

in the case of our directors, officers, and security holders, (i) the receipt by the locked - up party from us of shares of Class A common stock or Class B common stock upon (A) the exercise or settlement of stock options or RSUs granted under a stock incentive plan or other equity award plan described in this prospectus or (B) the exercise of warrants outstanding and which are described in this prospectus, or (ii) the transfer of shares of Class A common stock, Class B common stock, or any securities convertible into Class A common stock or Class B common stock upon a vesting or settlement event of our securities or upon the exercise of options or warrants to purchase our securities on a «cashless» or «net exercise» basis to the extent permitted by the instruments representing such options or warrants (and any transfer to us necessary to generate such amount of cash needed for the payment of taxes, including estimated taxes, due as a result of such vesting or exercise whether by means of a «net settlement» or otherwise) so long as such «cashless exercise» or «net exercise» is effected solely by the surrender of outstanding stock options or warrants (or the Class A common stock or Class B common stock issuable upon the exercise thereof) to us and our cancellation of all or a portion thereof to pay the exercise price or withholding tax and remittance obligations, provided that in the case of (i), the shares received upon such exercise or settlement are subject to the restrictions set forth above, and provided further that in the case of (ii), any filings under Section 16 (a) of the Exchange Act, or any other public filing or disclosure of such transfer by or on behalf of the locked - up party, shall clearly indicate in the footnotes thereto that such transfer of shares or securities was solely to us pursuant to the circumstances described in this bullet point;

I've spoken to a lot of friends over the past 3 months, and one of the common points they made was the difficulty in sticking to plans as markets go backwards.

What these groups have in common is that they are all broadly making the point that the political system and those in power are failing them — be it in the ability to offer basic education, affordable health care, or keeping kids safe in classrooms.

He had left the company back in 2013 but simultaneously came into a common point of conclusion over his XRP holdings.

Ben Carlson of A Wealth of Common Sense blog (and author of a great book by the same name), had a recent post Playing the Probabilities outlining that time has been an investor's best friend (for those investors that have had in some cases quite a bit of time), pointing to the following table.

The budget would be funded by taxes currently raised by member states and would «be able to raise money in common, invest and absorb economic shocks», Le Point quoted Macron as saying.

The deafening silence isn't surprising: as a MarketingWeek article points out, most marketers have no option but to keep quiet — because the practices that Cambridge Analytica has gotten in trouble for are common practices in the industry.

Because Facebook's common stock is stripped of many of the preferences that the stock of investors like DST or Microsoft has, the valuation for the common stock will be the best indicator of the company's true worth at that point in time.

To discover what a prospective customer's pain points might be, use your understanding of the common pain points that your existing customers already have and frame the discussion in a way that allows for the prospective to customer to either agree or disagree that they have these problems.

At some point, atheist assemble together and share what they have in common.

Theological liberalism has split one church after another — to the point that the theologically liberal in different churches often have more in common with each other than with the more orthodox in their own churches.

It's a mammoth feat to have an individual join a club who has nothing in common with the members and then those members vote that individual into leader of that organization so I think it's a moot point.

«So at this point, traditional Mormons, evangelical Protestants and conservative Catholics have more in common with one another politically than they do with the more liberal elements within their respective churches.»

I think the Jesus mythology has more in common with Mithra and Dionysus, but the point is the same: it's not a totally original story.

What the Gospels have in common is usually more important than the points on which they differ, but not always.

One final point that follows from this line of thought, which is also common to both Holloway and Pope Benedict, is that just as the Incarnation has already unified the family of man in a new way, society needs structures of government that reflect its increasingly globalised unity.

On this point we will only remark that Christ gave his Church such a plenary power and duty because without it a common life in the Church and concrete pastoral care by the Church for the salvation of the individual would be quite impossible.

I shall not delay the discussion here to defend Bergson against his critics, except to point out that what is frequently termed «irrationalism» in Bergson is precisely what he has in common with all modern disciplines that take the dimension of depth seriously.

Nonetheless, they do have points in common — namely, the points where their boundaries meet.5 Therefore, in terms of one of those common points, our question can be answered as follows: the space - time distance between A and B is O.

Thus in this concept «action at a distance» is readily explicable, since the point acting and the point «being acted upon» can both share a common component, namely the line they have in common.

In section III, I have argued that this use of the Cartesian starting point has many points in common with Leibniz's interpretation of the «First Meditation,» chief among them being a rejection of substance metaphysics, a doctrine of internal relations, and a monadic view of reality and consciousnesIn section III, I have argued that this use of the Cartesian starting point has many points in common with Leibniz's interpretation of the «First Meditation,» chief among them being a rejection of substance metaphysics, a doctrine of internal relations, and a monadic view of reality and consciousnesin common with Leibniz's interpretation of the «First Meditation,» chief among them being a rejection of substance metaphysics, a doctrine of internal relations, and a monadic view of reality and consciousness.

In most cases they have overcome both political fragmentation and government overload by replacing their old governmental bureaucracies with an innovative and effective form of governance: coalitions (composed of business, government, nonprofits, universities, neighborhood and minority associations, and religious groups) that develop a cooperative agenda to improve the city and that assume many of the city government's traditional functions (economic development, long - term planning, educational reform, even care of the homeless), and that also operate like political parties of yore (providing the point of access for new groups and a public realm for discourse, debate, and negotiation concerning matters of the common good).

The fact that we have DNA in common with every single species of life on this planet is not a coincidence, it is because we came from a common source at some point or another.

The point modernist rationalism has to establish, or assume, is that a common secular rationality exists which is capable in principle of resolving the issues that actually divide people.

In regards to words and language being fluid, that is my point when I state that while trust and faith may have common roots and share similarities, they do not mean the same thing right now in all circumstanceIn regards to words and language being fluid, that is my point when I state that while trust and faith may have common roots and share similarities, they do not mean the same thing right now in all circumstancein all circumstances.

We have disavowed a view of the relation between the colleges and the churches which would permit viewing them as agencies of the church in preference for a covenant relationship in which each is recognized to have its own function but a common commitment and point of view on crucial issues.

This, a judgment from within the rabbinic tradition, may probably be accepted as being, up to a point, a fair assessment of the grounds of the opposition which Jesus encountered from a party with which in some respects he had much in common.

Even more to the point, no two modern - day scholars seem able to draw up the same common list of errors, each finding on the other's worksheet difficulties which have, in their opinion, plausible modern - day alternate explanations often involving a reassessment of the author's intention and / or cultural context.

All those different points that you just wasted your time on writing out, all have one thing in common, they are all theories.

We have assimilated the common view that the whole of the Old Testament points to the coming of the Messiah, and that its predictions and expectations were completely and obviously fulfilled in the person of Jesus of Nazareth.

I have briefly noted some aspects of modern physics, medicine, and parapsychology to point to what you probably already knew: there is nothing in our modern common sense itself which rules out our consideration of a spiritual reality.

In our passage Jesus uses this common folk tale motif to drive home the same point that is expressed in his most powerful parable: «Inasmuch as you have done it to one of the least of these, you have done it to me» (MatIn our passage Jesus uses this common folk tale motif to drive home the same point that is expressed in his most powerful parable: «Inasmuch as you have done it to one of the least of these, you have done it to me» (Matin his most powerful parable: «Inasmuch as you have done it to one of the least of these, you have done it to me» (Matt.

And yet every single thing you point out have one thing in common that hom.ose.xuality doesn't.

The pastoral role is concerned with ministry to individuals; the priestly role has to do with the proclamation of the faith and with leadership in the liturgical life of the church; the prophetic role focuses on judging the level of humaneness in the social order and pointing to the changes required if common justice is to be approximated; the kingly role takes up governance and the expression of neighbor love through responsible corporate action.

The literalist point of view is now more common among the sects than in the mainline churches, but it still has its adherents in the latter, as any denominational paper which has a forum of letters to the editor will make evident.

«We have assumed that considerations about Christianity, personality, and society have many points in common.

These observations have already set forth certain fundamental aspects of Jesus» conception of God, and points at which his view of God differs from the Jewish, in spite of all they have in common.

Evanston pointed out that both mission and unity have a common source in Christ.

The following facts support this belief: the participation of the churches in the theological conversations of the ecumenical movement, which perforce have had to find their common starting point and common vocabulary in biblical literature and theology; the growing body of specifically biblical theology, produced by the very vitality of fragmentary and monographic studies.