Not exact matches
She
points out the discrepancies between the amount of time people
claim to spend on work during a week, for example, and the number of hours that studies
using time diaries actually show we spend making productive contributions to our jobs.
He himself
claimed to be» «an old school
point and click prop trader» who had «always been good with reflexes and doing things quick,»» and the «Layering Algorithm» that he
used was a customized version of «a program that allowed non-programmers to engage in automated trading
using spreadsheet commands and functions.»
She
pointed out that smugglers are
using claims of «credible fear» to get their human cargo into — and remain in — the United States.
At that
point, the
claimed infringement related to the dual - lens system
used in the iPhone 7 Plus, while the latest case targets the iPhone 8 Plus and iPhone X also...
Why did the CFIB
use the year 2000 as a starting
point? In another example of selecting statistics to fashion your
claims, they chose 2000 because that was a recent relative low
point for municipal spending.
(Creationism fails to be a theory mainly because of the last
point; it makes few or no specific
claims about what we would expect to find, so it can't be
used for anything.
Since 99 % of women
use birth control at some
point in their lives, I hardly think many Catholic women are operating as you
claim they «should».
@fimeilleur actually i can back up the
claims i make both personally and historically, one example Abraham, Machpelah (actual location of his tomb and remains along with 5 others in Israel right where they are supposed to be) Kedorlaomer king of Elam, (defeated by Abraham and recently discovered) it is said Abraham believed God and it was credited to him as righteousness.More than that Abraham saw God and spoke with Him, not the god you are on about that men
use to justify their evil intent, but the God who has created all things, the God that no one especially you can not contain.Ignorance is your choice but that will not negate the existence of God in any way.No one that i am aware of has all the answers at this
point regarding spiritual things, evolution or evilution there are areas God has not yet revealed to mankind but every day more is discovered.I find it amazing that God is big enough to share discovery even with those who would reject Him.
Like the good Dr. has
pointed out,
using your book to refute someone elses book when both have the same historical significance, outlandish
claims and religion is probably the dumbest thing you can do.
Both are
used to signal the reader or TV viewer that the idea,
point of view or product has authoritative support and is supposed to work and one not need question it's truth
claims or usefulness.
My
point to Steve was to
point out that we do come to different conclusions
using the same scripture therefore neither of us can
claim scriptural authority.
My
point was that believers in all faiths
claim that same experience; I
used Vishnu as it pertains to a large, active religion.
I do hear your
points that you think I have not seen the need for warning of danger, that you believe I think of it as «unChristian» to talk about such things, and that you may even believe that my comments are akin to protecting evil deeds and harming the innocent,
using the bible as a proof texting weapon to that end and contributing to a problem of church becoming fake and shallow while
claiming to be deep and pious.
But if we
use the Trinity as myth to
point to this unknowability of God, we must make clear that we are not
claiming that God is in fact tripartite.
When we add the obvious
point that the term itself is very frequently to be found in the synoptic tradition and comparatively infrequently outside it, then it becomes clear that we are fully entitled to
claim that the real and significant differences between the
use within the synoptic tradition and outside it call for an explanation.
The pity is it has been bastardized by people who've laid
claim to the person and message of Jesus and
used it to further the agenda of their flesh, thereby missing the
point entirely..........
The
point I wanted to make is that God invites His people to study His Word in depth, to
use the minds that He gave us and renewed, to gradually discover the deep levels of His progressive revelation, and to compare the internal consistency of His message to
claims from other religions which invariably crumble upon thoughtful analysis.
So the principle that God
uses language to tell us things is at once established; and the
claim that Scripture is a further case in
point - a
claim, be it said, that is irremoveably embedded at foundation level in Jesus» teaching about his Messiahship and God's righteousness (1)-- presents no new conceptual problem.
But Topher, keep in mind that if God can bend scientific laws as He chooses, there is no
point in
using ANY science, including science you
claim supports the Bible.
It is a criterion much
used in England, as McArthur
points out, and he
claims that it is the most objective of the criteria which can be
used.
Although one could argue that we are wrong in subtracting certain things or in
using the values we do at various
points, and so
claim that economic welfare has in fact not declined in recent years, it would be equally possible to reintroduce leisure into our calculations and end up with figures indicating a more drastic decline.
The issue was on hell and whether it should be
used in evangelism and your
point of stating that the gospel was
claiming that the Christian way of life was a better way of life as though that was sufficient.
Yes, the Muslims
claim a «single source» for the Quran, and try to
use that as a talking
point, but it still doesn't hold up.
Defenders of classical theism often implicitly
use the latter criterion,
claiming they have defended their God's failure to prevent horrendous evils by simply
pointing out that there might be some reason, knowable only by God, as to why it was good not to intervene.15 I would say, in any case, that it need not be «clear» in a strong sense of the term.
In the light of that
claim, it is reasonable to attribute the New Testament's
use of the phrase «the Jews» to the
point of view of an era when the church was in conflict with the Jewish community, hence to conclude that the anti-Semitism in the New Testament is incidental.
I am not suggesting faith in God is the same as faith in astrophysics but merely to
point out that you too
use faith as
claimed knowledge in something that you simply can not prove.
Louis van Gaal has refused to
use De Gea until after the transfer window has closed,
claiming that the former Atletico Madrid's concentration will be suspect until that
point.
It is all very well to make money but unless that is
used to finance the team in order to achieve the success Kroenke
claims is his driving ambition, what is the
point unless it is to line the pockets of Kroenke and co?
I simply
pointed out that the studies you cited did not support the
claims you were making, and that you can not draw casual inferences from studies that do not
use random assignment.
One study by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) found that, although parents may
claim that sleep aids work well for their infants, the research actually
points to the fact that babies tend to
use a lot of different objects for falling asleep, instead of just one favorite object.
It doesn't
point to a specific
claim, and then asks whether all such
claims use or ignore wireless access.
Danny Hakim at The Times
pointed out today that while the internal memo from Linda Lacewell does seem to include a passage that backs up the initial
claims first report by The TU in 2007 — that then - Senate Majority Leader Joe Bruno did
use a state helicopter for non-official
use at least once.
Assembly Majority Leader Joe Morelle
points out the tipline was created in February 2012, well before the Safe Act was enacted and denies Goodell's
claim the Division of Criminal Justice Services has been asked to
use the tipline to target Upstate rifle owners.
Take the
points yourself and
use linear least squares to make a linear function, which will disprove your baseless
claims.
Watts then
pointed to embroiled data firm Cambridge Analytica CEO Alexander Nix, whose CEO
claimed in hidden camera footage that the company could
use Ukrainian sex workers to entrap politicians.
The study
claimed that 80 % of the accounts were created in the weeks before polling day, and were
used to target voters with key political messages during vital
points in the campaign, including the aftermath of the Manchester Arena bombing.
Honestly, I am slightly pro-legalization myself (maybe with some rationing system), but anytime I see someone
claiming the
point about medicinal THC (or the one about
using hemp for ropes and paper) makes me wonder if maybe marihuana actually causes that much brain damage.
The
point being that the biggest argument for controlling marijuana, the
claim that it lead to
use of worse drugs, was pretty much proven to be false, and most statisticians and researchers seem to agree on that fact today.
hypothetical situations
used to illustrate my
point, not
claims of anything that actually happened.
Markey's support for the bill, and more specifically her unsubstantiated
claim that a bishop had briber her to drop it, was
used by Barnwell as a talking
point against her.
Cambridge Analytica
claims on its website that it's able create psychological profiles to «effectively engage and persuade voters
using specially tailored language and visual ad combinations» that appeal to each person on an emotional level,» and that the company has «up to 5,000 data
points on over 230 million American voters.»
The conference has spent the last month pushing back on the
claims of advocates for public financing and debated the cost of the system,
pointing to more pressing needs for the
use of public funds.
Prosecutors, in their complaint against Ciminelli,
point to his political contributions and
claim they were
used to buy him access and influence in Albany and ultimately win more state contracts.
She
used another bill she is the lead sponsor on as a
point of comparison, incorrectly
claiming that while her «Card Check Neutrality» bill has 20 co-sponsors, the preferential rent bill only has 6.
It wouldn't be hard to
use China as a jumping - off
point if you're in organized crime or another nation state looking to cause some saber rattling between China and the U.S.» Much of the U.S.'s current tension with China comes from Google's
claims that recent hacker attempts to steal Gmail user passwords appeared to have originated from China.
Casti's
claim that complexity is subjective is, therefore, beside the
point, although he is right to
point to the confusion that arises with the
use of the same word «complex» in anecdotal and formalistic contexts.
Others
point out that such a
claim is hard to prove because the same factors that lead people to
use marijuana in the first place might also lead them to
use other drugs.
Most of them were careful to
point out that the revolutionary
claim from the scientists involved in the experiment, which
used the BICEP2 telescope (for Background Imaging of Cosmic Extragalactic Polarization, second generation), must be confirmed by additional experiments that could rule out alternative explanations.
The FDA, in its warning letter to Meditherm, ordered the company to stop making broad
claims about its cameras,
pointing to a Web page that lists «76 specific conditions for which you say your device can be
used... for example, lower motor neuron disease, neoplasias (melanoma, squamous cell, basal) and nutritional disease (alcoholism, diabetes).»
Those who
claim correlation
using derivatives (differences) removes a linear trend miss the
point.