Sentences with phrase «pointed at their father»

When he eventually returned home, he was disgraced, and Gerhard shared much of the fate that was pointed at his father.

Not exact matches

At that point, the form was a rough draft and still had many omissions including not listing any foreign government contacts and even omitted the address of my father - in - law (which was obviously well known).

At this point, Dyson decided to go and work at his father's enterprise, and over the course of two years, he worked on a project from concept to just before manufacture - but it never went into production, because, as Dyson remembers it, it was too contemporary for the time (and it may be still be so today, he addsAt this point, Dyson decided to go and work at his father's enterprise, and over the course of two years, he worked on a project from concept to just before manufacture - but it never went into production, because, as Dyson remembers it, it was too contemporary for the time (and it may be still be so today, he addsat his father's enterprise, and over the course of two years, he worked on a project from concept to just before manufacture - but it never went into production, because, as Dyson remembers it, it was too contemporary for the time (and it may be still be so today, he adds).

As the Washington Post reported, his father Fred Trump was at one point one of the wealthiest men in America, developing apartment complexes in Brooklyn and Queens.

At one point she was even pulled out of school for over a month and hidden with family friends in the south of France because of a surge in death threats against her father.

At this point, ministry is to get him to accept the Father's Love, and to find a church that will love him unconditionally.

Vitz observes that, doctrinal objections aside, it is «bizarre to the point of pathology at this time in our culture to be trying to remove God the Father from our theology.»

As pointed out by Father Neuhaus (While We're At It, April), «all kinds of studies appearing with great regularity tell us that Jews are, generally speaking, very smart.»

He draws back at points, asking: If the Fathers had no difficulty holding bodily and spiritual ascension together, «should we have any difficulty?

The whole point of Jeremy's series here is to look at the OT violence and explain it in light of the revelation of the Father that Jesus gives us.

So if you have a triune god who is father, son, and holy ghost but you have a mother of the human manifestation of father / son god — then Mary is arguably the mother of god and in that way could be argued as the more divine at some point in the history of the transformation of the triune god in heaven to the triune god on earth and of course the few days when the triune god on earth was dead (but not really dead) before rising.

Just want you to know that what Jesus did was not done in the fathers presence either, at the point he was about to die on the cross the father had turned away and Jesus knew he hung there alone at one point.

Could it be that Joseph Smith at one point taught that Adam was our Father and God?

Doug WAS my Pastor but I had begin to realize this was all becoming bullshit and began attending mass with my parents as support as he was mostly an absent father and husband at that point.

At that point we moderns simply have to part company with the early church fathers.»

At one point I believe that I am closer to Teilhard — or, at least, to the Teilhard whom I understand — than Father Heisig admitAt one point I believe that I am closer to Teilhard — or, at least, to the Teilhard whom I understand — than Father Heisig admitat least, to the Teilhard whom I understand — than Father Heisig admits.

This, at any rate, is the way in which I approach the meaning and reality of the sacred and profane, and thus I would resist Father Heisig's point that I understand the profane as a passive element that evolves only through its association with the sacred.

Assertions to the effect that God is the Creator of the universe, the Father of mankind, or that he came in human form in Jesus Christ, probably do not relate helpfully at any point to the experience of the questioner and may well clash with well - grounded concepts derived from other areas of his experience.

So far as many of his hearers were concerned, and certainly so far as the ones to whom the parable was particularly addressed were concerned, at this point the son becomes dead in his father's eyes and any self - respecting Jewish father would have spurned him had he returned in such disgrace.

Perhaps Father Meyer is here speaking from a Protestant point of view, and from an all - too - modern Protestant perspective at that.

It is only at this point that the son sees his father's love for him.

Yet just at the point where we find ourselves assuming full responsibility, free from the restraints of mythological powers, we become slowly aware that it is He, the God of our fathers, who is in fact prompting, guiding and influencing us from within.

At one point in the evening, the following words are spoken (a close paraphrase, not direct quotation): «It was not our Fathers and our Mothers who were Pharaoh's slaves in Egypt but we, all of us gathered here tonight, were Pharaoh's slaves in Egypt.

Note how you jump to verse 8 when you recite the verse, leaving out the key point at verse 6: «If your brother, the son of your mother, your son or your daughter, the wife of your bosom, or your friend who is as your own soul, secretly entices you, saying, «Let us go and serve other gods,» which you have not known, neither you nor your fathers...» Here the person is not entering into a debate but rather asking you to go and serve other gods — that is when when God is saying watch out.

The warm, Christian smiles were set aside at that point, and the time - delayed effect of our own indoctrination came into play: We dropped the guise of warm, friendly God - the - Son and reverted back to God - the - Father who looks at the entire world as described in Psalm 50:10 and says, «Everything I see is MINE.»

It's at this point I'd say that you can't legislate morality but is the result of knowing Father.

Joe balks at this, even to the point of trying to pay off Father Stock.

Geoffrey Wainwright allows for alternatives, but insists that churches use «Father, Son, and Holy Spirit» at key points of Christian worship such as baptisms, eucharistic prayers, creeds and ordinations.

Thus one could ask the authors exactly how often and at what points the Trinity must be called «Father, Son, and Holy Spirit» without compromising the faith; one could also ask feminists how often and in what contexts one could invoke that naming without supporting male dominance.

(For link fans, the video & notes may be found at http://www.calvaryccm.com/teachings/main/video/GS49.aspx) He made a very valid point: if the crucifixion was all there was to life in Christ, Jesus and His Father could've «done it over the weekend,» rather than take 33 years... especially that last week.

At one point he argues, more sweepingly, that «sixty percent of Afro - American children are now being brought up without the emotional or material support of a father.

This is the point at which I can make a religious statement, «I look on God as a Father.»

This concerns the Taoist and Confucian concept of Heaven, the Way and Goodness as pointing to the Holy Trinity: «Chinese religion is aware of transcendent power, T'ien (Heaven), at work in those who seek Jen (goodness) by following the Tao (Way)-- fragmentary glimpses, perhaps, of the heavenly Father whose Spirit elicits and sustains our union with Christ, the Incarnate Way» (p47).

It is at this point - after telling them that they must believe but recognizing that they don't - that He launches into verse 37: «All that the Father gives Me will come to Me, and the one who comes to Me I will by no means cast out.»

For the first time in history, the father and the doctor and the health - insurance actuary can point a finger at her as the person who allowed an inconvenient human being to come into the world.

At this point in my life, I am so convinced of the tenderness of the Father's heart that in those times when a public «word» is given from a person who understands the function of these gifts in the body of Christ, edification will be the aim.

Just because Wars had been waged in the name of religion doesn't make the point of it Wrong,,, otherwise why does it say (He who loves me, keeps my commandments) almost at the same time as it says (I give you a new commandment, love...) in short, Yes, Jesus is what matters, but to know Jesus I need His word, the Bible, I need a relationship with Him, I need to understand What He wants me to be Like (Be Holy as your Father in Heaven) which is not just an old testament quote, but a new Testament as well,,, at the end, if Religion was so pointless and to be hated, why Would God ask us to test the spirits, why does he tell us (by their fruits you would know them.)

On pp. 85 - 87 he analyses Hebrews 10:5 - 10, which, he points out, presents Christ as saying to the Father, «A body you prepared for me... I have come... to do your will,» at the moment of the Incarnation.

This relationship is of some importance, for Weiss developed a point of view that is steeped in New Testament textual and historical criticism but is more far out than that of his father and much at variance with the nineteenth - century liberalism of Ritschl.

I do not wish to father on Bishop Dun what I am trying to suggest in these pages, but I think that the point which he made at that time is highly relevant to what we are attempting to do here.

he says at one point (thinking specifically of Zeus» castration and murder of his father, the titan Cronos).

Giovanni Perrone, the Jesuit theologian at the Collegio Romano, was sympathetic to Newman's point that different views of the council fathers become the seeds from which an apostolic definition arise, but felt bound to comment, «I should not be so bold as to say that.»

From my own peculiar point of vantage I sense that many Christians may be missing something — a message hidden in Scripture, in the words of the church fathers, and in the deliberations at Vatican II — without which our attempts at interfaith dialogue will be of little or no avail.

In fact, at this point in Jesus» life, obedience to His parents was His Father's business.

At the crucial point in Absalom's rebellion against his father David, we are told that «the Lord had ordained to defeat the counsel of Ahithophel, so that the Lord might bring evil upon Absalom».

[4] The point around which he constructs his work is to see «Jesus in the light of his communion with the Father, which is the true centre of his personality; without it, we can not understand him at all, and it is from this centre that he makes himself present to us still today.»

Meanwhile, in 1981, in an innovative paper presented at United Theological College, Bangalore, Arvind P. Nirmal found a point of irreversible departure «Towards a Sudra Theology» which had eventually led him to be the father of dalit theology.3 Nirmal himself used to recall the lores and stories from the Marathi dalit oral tradition and admitted that he has been greatly influenced by them in his understanding of God.

The Yehudi at one point ascribes his inability to be a good husband or father to the fact that he suffers in himself the exile of the Shekinah.

At this point serious presence in the world can only take the form of reaffirmation of the truth of God, of faith in the Lord of the nations and the Father of Jesus Christ.

He was about His Father's business, and part of that at this point in his life was to obey his parents, to be subject to them.