Sentences with phrase «pointed comments about»

He took the opportunity to make some pointed comments about laywers having to «pull together» during this time of significant challenges both and in the profession and the justice system — not only in terms of access to justice but in failing confidence of the public in their legal representatives.

Buffett has some pretty pointed comments about this in relaying his purchase of Washington Post at the depths of the 73 - 74 bear market which arguably rivaled the sort of panic conditions in late 08 / early 09.

In her latest video dispatch, Chaz presents Clooney's full answer in which he makes pointed comments about presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump.

Questioner 21: Last year you had some very pointed comments about Valeant.

Not exact matches

But those commenting on her choice of shoes also faced criticism on social media for caring about her footwear and overlooking the point of her visit.

It's important to point out that Raghu is talking about Trump's comments — not the actions he describes in those comments, which would constitute not just workplace sexual harassment, but assault.

In his usual forthright manner, state Treasurer and Transport Minister Troy Buswell made some pointed comments earlier this year about the role of the state's port authority boards.

The most pointed comments Tuesday came from Mr. Dimon, who has been vocal about the effect regulatory changes are having on the banking industry.

P&G Chief Brand Officer Marc Pritchard has made pointed comments in recent months about less than half of agency resources broadly being spent on creative resources.

A spokesman for Pershing Square said declined to comment other than to point to its proxy statement, which didn't mention the talk about Ackman's ability to cause media coverage but did say Ackman told ADP it was in the company's interest to avoid the distraction of a board fight.

Mr. Mar's comments put him in the unfortunate position of appearing more supportive of the Americanization than even Wildrose leader Danielle Smith, who supports the introduction of private facilities, but sticks to finely - tuned talking points when talking about full - privatization.

Wanted to comment on Trey's point about women not able to conceive having often been condemned in the OT.

That being said, I don't know what your point was in making the comment about its being a weird Romanian name.

Okay, so to prove my point about the mo rons and fools, these statements (shown below) about my comment shows total lack of understanding and certainly an absence of gray matter between the ears.

Their point though is that the main stream media is attacking MK and her comments about Santa because of an article in the Post praising MK, that the main stream media wants to discredit her and Fox.

That's the point I was gesturing at with my comment about the different tasks of apologetics and dogmatics: Apologetics has its place, but it should not be allowed to distort dogmatics.

I'm also going to add this; in earlier comments you raised some legitimate points for discussion about how the British Mandate was apportioned, which is a huge part of the whole quagmire and the legality of it all is a huge, tangled, convoluted mess.

In this work he commented one by one on all his writings, giving details about the date and circumstances of the work, noting places where he had changed his mind, pointing out passages where he got things wrong, for example where he had cited a biblical text from memory and not gotten it correct.

Patriarchae, my point is that Pastor Jeffers» comments about Mormonism perfectly exemplifies the main problem with the hundreds upon hundreds upon hundreds of Protestant denominations (most of whom can not agree on the time of day much less matters theological).

Rather than just leave a comment on his post, which I have, I want to post about it myself.Toby rightly points out that the great American theologian Reinhold Niebuhr created the now famous «serenity prayer», used by Alcoholics Anonymous for years.

This is my response to Limbaugh's dim comment: No Mr. Limbaugh, we only talk about Jesus Christ to point out your hypocrisy on the subject of being good Christians and the vessel of morality.

TheLies» comment above about your post as usual conveniently ignores the critical point that crimes done by Stalin et al were not done under any guidance of atheism, whereas the guidance to do the many atrocities that Christians have done can be found in the many horrific instructions «from god» presented in the Christian book of nasty AKA the bible.

I am sure it is true and that is my point here I was commenting on the compassion of a person, not their religion, and momoya had to reveal his / her real agenda that has not pupose here, as I was not talking religion I was talking about compassion and the desire for one individual to help another.

Becky Garrison makes an excellent point about this in her comment (September 12, 2014 at 1:31 pm).

I never have had to live in fear of any sexual predator, or be on the receiving of any comments about the modesty of my attire to the point of what I wear even being an issue.

Fair enough, except why then did he take as his point of departure Benedict's comments about communion of desire?

I do hear your points that you think I have not seen the need for warning of danger, that you believe I think of it as «unChristian» to talk about such things, and that you may even believe that my comments are akin to protecting evil deeds and harming the innocent, using the bible as a proof texting weapon to that end and contributing to a problem of church becoming fake and shallow while claiming to be deep and pious.

The earlier comment using John 6:40: this was spoken BEFORE the resurrection of Jesus, so talking about it at that point would have meant nothing to them.

It's not a blanket statement about atheists, its an extreme example to emphasize the point of the comment.

My comment about a theocracy was making the point that America was not set up as such but that a country which lived to love and honor God would be-Awesome!

LinCA You missed the point or intentionally put words in my mouth as I said nothing about Richards comment only your use of the Bible.

I read a lot of Calvinist literature in English and literature classes and in history class the closest thing I saw to anti-Christian sentiment was a comment about how Islamic scholars in West Africa criticized Christian teachers for doing exactly what the Islamic scholars had been doing (the hypocrisy was clearly pointed out).

This is to davidnfran hay David you might have brought this up in a previous post I haven't read, but i did read quit a bit about your previous comments and replies at the beginning of this blog, so I was just wondering in light of what hebrews 6 and 10 say how would you enterprite passages like romans 8 verses 28 thrue 39 what point could paul have been trying to make in saying thoughs amazing things in romans chapter 8 verses 28 thrue 39 in light of hebrews 6 and 10, Pauls says that god foreknew and also predestined thoughs whom he called to be conformed to the image of his son so that he would be the first born among many brothers and then he goes on saying that neither death nor life nor angels nor rulers nor things present nor things to come nor powers nor hight nor death can ever separate us from the love of god in christ jesus so how would i inturprate that in light of that warning in hebrews 6 and 10,

A final comment about speculation and the present context: What has come to be called «foundationalism» is the attempt, through empirical and / or rational procedures, to establish an absolutely certain starting point.

Robert Cheeks suggests in his comment on my last Songbook post that if there aren't any, there's really no point in me saying that Rock is ambivalent about or even resistant to modernity.

It's a shame that some believers have scoffed at some of Shia Labeouf's recent comments about converting to Christianity, pointing fingers at the fact that he still uses bad language weeks after becoming a Christian.

Dionysius did comment at one point about something he called «the omnipotent goodness of the Divine weakness,» 11 but he did not elaborate on the implications of this insight.

Here is a link to a video that is a powerful speech its from an older movie called the dictator, very good movie by the way, Anyway Charlie chaplin plays the part of hitler and uses a very powerful and memorable speach about equality and the way life is moving,» https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WibmcsEGLKo» you have shown nothing but malice in these comments and you wonder why gay's are protrayed as the «bad guys» in video games and movies and if you don't believe that then watch this» https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XdmJXHJLZ6M» the point is I will respect the person who is silent, holding a flag that has ever color before i Can or Will ever respect someone like yourself.

The Catechism does at several points touch on a more synthetic integration of all God's works, commenting that «creation is revealed as the first step towards» the final Covenant of Love (CCC 288) and that» God created the world the sake of communion with his divine life, a communion brought about by the convocation of men in Christ, and this convocation is the Church» (CCC 760).

Two comments about this third point: First, the statement of this requirement is evidence that neither the concept of God in general nor the conception of the consequent nature of God is ad hoc to Whitehead's system.

At about the foregoing point in Gorusch's comments, I was ready to climb off the Gorsuch train and invite others to do likewise.

I'm going to make this my last comment on this thread, not because talking about this in the way this conversation has gone is upsetting for me but I just don't see the point of talking any more with the way it has gone.

Griffin & Sherburne, New York: The Free Press, 1978, 231) The only point that needs to be made about these comments for the purposes of the present discussion is that the consequent nature of God has a functional role in Whitehead's metaphysical system.

«Contrary to comments by GLSEN falsely labeling the Day of Truth as «inappropriate and divisive,» the event was always about the right of students to peacefully express their point of view on the subject of homosexual behavior,» the statement said.

In the event a fellow minister sees the «outline», however, one should be prepared for comments reflecting surprise, curiosity, and maybe jests about the poverty of thought in «points» entitled «However» and «Yet perhaps».

At one point, participants jotted down «what major comment about worship [they would] like to make.»

Your apartheid comment connects with my point about making sure you know who your enemy is.

Your comments are kind of funny... my whole point is that I am not the only person who knows the truth about how women are treated in the faith community — ask thousands of people and you will find out.

Fishon... I think you may have misunderstood my last comment, but upon reading it myself, I'm less clear than I thot.Nevertheless, I agree with you and that was my point, most believers that I know or read about have their initial conversion experience long before they adopt developed doctrines of scripture.

He can't counter my POINTS, so he makes some vapid comment about chihuahuas and seeing «the truth» through prayer.