Sentences with phrase «pointing at his creation»

«It's super cool,» White exclaims, pointing at his creation.

Not exact matches

They point at these quasi-monopolies as a cause, if not the main cause, of the recent slowdown in American startup creation.

Instead, look at all of your content through a mobile lens at the point of creation.

«Explicit content personalization through choice and discovery builds trust, increases engagement, and delivers a truly valuable experience starting at the point of creation.

At bottom, artificial intelligence is the creation of a race, after all — a race of living breathing tin men, or, more to the point, a creation that can later do the creation for us.

It starts at the point of creation.

«If you look at more current information, you will see that these data points are not demonstrative of our current network, community impact, and both the direct and indirect job creation near fulfillment centers,» a company representative said previously, adding that «Amazon's investments led to the creation of 200,000 additional non-Amazon jobs, ranging from construction jobs to healthcare industry positions.»

Five months later, a minimum batch of 300 bottles (the output of one barrel) is ready, at which point you sit down with Wills to put a name and look to your new creation.

The first analyst to offer a comment was Scott Davis of Barclays, who for years had been slamming Immelt and his sorry record of wealth creation and who at one point had called for the CEO's ouster.

When keyword targeting is approached separately from a content creation strategy, the concocted results can often leave us scratching our heads and pointing fingers at the malformed «Frankenpages.»

With greater life expectancy, more retirement - aged individuals are remaining in the workforce, resulting in a higher share of older people in the workforce than at any point since before the creation of Medicare, reported Bloomberg, with 19 % of Americans over 65 working at least part - time in 2017.

The company says it's blocking «millions of fake accounts each day at the point of creation.»

And don't say the condition somehow changed at some point in time to facilitate creation of life.

For some Christians, feminism contradicts deeply held beliefs about gender and the characteristics and roles they believe were assigned to men and women at the point of creation.

For example, there is certainly not more evidence for creation and evolution is a fact at this point because the evidence is so overwhelming (genetic evidence is so strong, fossils are no longer even needed).

As it seeks to apply this voluntarism to marriage and family, which are not mere social constructs but are firmly anchored in God's creation, we may see liberalism at last reaching a breaking point.

Only at a point long after the creation did he appear to have relinquished His divinity.

Finally, the point at which we Christians have recognized our failure most clearly is in our long ignoring of what we now call «the integrity of creation.»

Christianity, for example, is essentially based on the twofold belief that man is in a special sense an object of pursuit to the divine power throughout creation, and that Christ is the terminal point at which, supernaturally but also physically, the consummation of humanity is destined to be achieved.

Nevertheless, at specific points such as the time and manner of creation and the expectancy of divine intervention in an established order, the defenders of traditional Christian belief have had to make more adjustments than have the exponents of the scientific spirit.

As she continues to read, we hear about Paul's incarceration and persecution, about how Jesus is «the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation,» about watching out for all those false teachings that circulated through the trade routes, about how we ought to stop judging each other over differences of opinion regarding religious festivals and food (I blush a little at this point and resolved to make peace with some rather opinionated friends before the next sacred meal), about how we should clothe ourselves with compassion, kindness, humility, gentleness, and patience, and love, about how we must forgive one another, about how the things that once separated Jew from Greek and slave from free are broken down at the foot of the cross, about how we should sing more hymns.

Nygren can include election in his list of the themes which keep the dynamic aspect of the Christian doctrine of God, for election, as we have seen, means God's self - disclosure to a people at a point in history, his creation of a new relationship and the assuming of its consequences.

While all evidence, logic and reasoning point to a Creator and absolute truth, you prefer to hide behind relativism and a theory of evolution which does not, in fact, describe the creation of the universe at all, or why concepts of good and evil or morality exist.

The idea that life might at some point lose its ability to charm and interest us suggests that the natural world — which, theologically, we must call the creation — might finally fail us.

Thirdly, if it did support the biblical view of creation, it would equally support ANY religious view of creation that has the Universe popping into existence at a discrete point in time, including the richly diverse and inconsistent Hindu, Norse and Aboriginal Australian and Native American creation myths.

How can anyone say they believe in God who created male and female above; and that God said that they should be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth — and claim that the same God has created them with a sexual orientation that makes it impossible for them to reproduce — ensuring no fruitfulness and multiplication which God commanded at point of creation?

It is, at least, apparent that the debates about humanitarian intervention by military force in the last decade, about the creation of international criminal tribunals in a number of cases, about the idea of a state's «universal jurisdiction» in cases of violations of the Genocide Convention or other «crimes against humanity,» about how far the global war on terror may proceed without violating the rights of states, and most recently, about the United - States - led use of force against the Saddam Hussein regime in Iraq, have all raised important points of positive and customary international law, and that in every one of these cases the outcome remains unsettled.

William Cate has written that «Christian unity occurs at points of interchurch contact and relationship: it is not the creation of an ecumenical structure...» («Ecumenism Surges in Local Churches,» The Christian Century [March 14, 1984], p. 268).

The famous Dr. Charles Hodge of Princeton Seminary pointed to this when he said that in Darwinism «species owe their origin, not to the original intention of the mind; not to the special acts of creation calling new forms into existence at certain epochs; not to the constant and everywhere operative efficiency of God, guiding physical causes in the production of intended effects; but the gradual accumulation of unintended variations of structure and instinct.

Jesus points it out very clearly: there is no human criterion at all that is capable of knowing how the Creator's design to fulfill creation is going to look.

At an early point in its development, this sense of God as in total control expressed itself and was reinforced by the affirmation of creation out of nothing.

Creation wasn't some one - time thing at some point in the past as, say, Locke or the Big Bangers teach.

The Catechism does at several points touch on a more synthetic integration of all God's works, commenting that «creation is revealed as the first step towards» the final Covenant of Love (CCC 288) and that» God created the world the sake of communion with his divine life, a communion brought about by the convocation of men in Christ, and this convocation is the Church» (CCC 760).

It didn't happen millions of billions of years ago, but at the same time, a «day» isn't really a 24 - hour day (p. 65) and the only real point of the creation account is to tell us that God made mankind in His image (p. 70).

Of course, in the process of writing this, I have issues with «intervene», as it points to a God who is separate from creation and who only interacts at select times, rather than a God who is the foundation for, and permeates all of creation.

And if it was created at some point, does the discovery of the Higgs boson somehow negate the fact that there was a force behind that creation?

Cobb at one point tells us that God's ultimate creative goal is to «introduce the possibility of a creative synthesis of the new with the old,» and Ogden tells us that «God's only aim or intention in exercising his power is the fullest possible self - creation of all his creatures» (PTT 107, FF 89).

So - called American Catholics use birth control; mis - quote the bible to the point that Protestants laugh at them; dismiss most of the creation, garden, flood and babel stories as myth; and attend mass 8 weeks out of the year, if that.

At this point God, though on a throne in heaven and outside of time and nonexistent in a physical body, was somehow walking in the garden and called for his two people creations.

It consequently follows that at any point in our lives both creation and judgment impinge upon us at one and the same time.

All such processes of self - creation inevitably, however, sooner or later come to rest in death, ideally at a point when the life - potential for that individual or society has been fully lived out.

I don't think you can be up here and look out the window as I did the first day and see the Earth from this vantage point, to look out at this kind of creation and not believe in God.

As pointed out at the time, this was in contradiction to statements he had made previously, inwhich he had repudiated the idea of human cloning: «Human cloning has grabbed people's imagination, but that is merely a diversion — and one we personally regret, and find distasteful,» he had said in The Second Creation, the book on Dolly's cloning which he co-authored with embryologist Kenneth Campbell in 2002.

These worlds, traditionally referred to as the «order of creation» and the «order of redemption,» converge at the point of trying to be a Christian within the daily demands of the family, the job, the community around us, and the larger community of the state and the world of nations.

If ever there was an opportunity in human history for the reconstruction of faith, for the self - disclosure of the Incomprehensible Transcendent source of being as God, as wholly loyal to his creation, as redeemer of all the promises given with the gift of existence itself, then it was at this point where faith in him became incarnate.

The initial source of light in the Genesis account does not necessarily need to be our sun, as the light from our sun is brought up at a later point in the creation account.

At the point where anyone of religious faith would then attribute the goodness and power of creation to an omnipotent and loving God, Frank chooses to step back from that conclusion, and just revel in «the mystery», and bemoan its sudden passing when we die.

Without that possibility there could be no freedom in the creation at all at any point.

The future of the novum ultimum is the point at which the creation encounters God in God's powerful fullness.

Ever consider that at one point even before the creation of time that the only thing to exist was existence itself, with an intelligence, and everything came from that intelligence?