Not exact matches
In my mind this begs an important question, and highlights the primary
point of
disagreement I have with Greene's assessment of nudging: While we continue to advocate for legislative and bureaucratic solutions to burdensome procedures and applications, should we intervene to support students to make more active and informed decisions
during these critical junctures, or should we let them figure it out for themselves?
Confirming an important
point conceded by Deputy SG
during last Term's oral arguments, the Government's Gall brief states repeatedly that policy
disagreements with the Guidelines can be a valid basis for a variance — even though many circuit have held otherwise (like the Tenth Circuit in a split ruling yesterday) and even though many lower court briefs filed by the Government have argued otherwise.
These qualities are indexed by a person being able to say things like «Good
point,» or «That's interesting, tell me more» or, «You may be right, and I may be wrong»
during a
disagreement.
No finger
pointing: Whether it's because of daily frustrations or unresolved baggage, many couples tend to
point fingers at each other
during disagreements.
Even when upset or angry, happy couples tend to work hard to respect their partner, have a sense of humor, and listen to a different
point of view
during a
disagreement.
Raters scored parental behavior
during the task on three 7 -
point rating scales (ranging from «none» to «exclusive / constant»): Negative control (i.e., use of physical control, use of criticism), negative affect (i.e., frowning, harsh tone of voice) and conflict (i.e.,
disagreement, arguing or tussling).