Sentences with phrase «points by climate skeptics»

And it turns out that his own research bears directly on one of today's major talking points by climate skeptics.

Not exact matches

He points to the fact that Smith is currently investigating the activities of federal climate scientists whose research last year undermined claims by Climate Change skeptics that global warming was going through a «hiatus&climate scientists whose research last year undermined claims by Climate Change skeptics that global warming was going through a «hiatus&Climate Change skeptics that global warming was going through a «hiatus».

The letter portends to offer facts about «climate change deniers, but readers can't even get further than the first paragraph without running into an unsupportable talking point about skeptic climate scientists saying global warming «isn't happening / happening, but for natural reasons / happening and caused by humans, but it's not so bad.»

Neither Gelbspan nor anyone repeating his accusation ever proved the money trail led to an industry directive to lie about global warming science; none of them have proved skeptic climate scientists were instructed to mimic tobacco industry tactics; journalists have demonstrably not offered overall fair balance in to skeptic climate scientists; the «wedge» being driven is one arguably pounded by enviro - activists who push the «skeptics don't deserve fair media balance» talking point; and Gelbspan was not the first one to bring up this talking point.

This new objectively - based climate science undercuts the climate alarmist «consensus,» but also a few points often made by some climate skeptics.

The vision of the skeptic community denying that the world is warming at all is a straw man created by the climate catastrophists to avoid arguing about the much more important point in her second paragraph.

When pressed, Oliver was not able to identify which scientists he was using as a source, La Pressereported, but his staff pointed to an article by Lawrence Solomon, a Canadian writer and infamous climate - change skeptic and denier, and the founder and executive director of Energy Probe, an environmental policy organization and fossil fuel lobbyist group.

The claim is often made that climate realists (a.k.a. skeptics) can not point to peer - reviewed papers to support their position that there is no evidence of «dangerous global warming:» caused by human emissions of so - called «greenhouse» gases, including carbon dioxide.

According to Climate Depot, the» talking points memo -LSB-...] is a complete skeptics» guide for elected officials, media and the public on how to discuss global warming backed up by dozens of citations to peer - reviewed research.»

The argument to «learn what else drives climate» is a complete red herring, as if scientists are not already figuring out everything they can (which in turn is then being repeatedly re shaped to use to try to refute Climate Change by «skeptic» websites, as is everything), and is just used as another false refutation of, or confusion on, the basic assessment and risk range that the at this point fairly well known and well substantiated general concept of Climate Change reprclimate» is a complete red herring, as if scientists are not already figuring out everything they can (which in turn is then being repeatedly re shaped to use to try to refute Climate Change by «skeptic» websites, as is everything), and is just used as another false refutation of, or confusion on, the basic assessment and risk range that the at this point fairly well known and well substantiated general concept of Climate Change reprClimate Change by «skeptic» websites, as is everything), and is just used as another false refutation of, or confusion on, the basic assessment and risk range that the at this point fairly well known and well substantiated general concept of Climate Change reprClimate Change represents.

This 1998 EnviroVideo / Green Sphere video, uploaded to Youtube in 2007, begins immediately by incorrectly labeling Gelbspan as a Pulitzer winner, and, before going into his standard narrative about corrupt skeptic climate scientists «repositioning global warming as theory rather than fact», Gelbspan says the following, starting at the 3:56 point:

Not helping himself in the least, Niose employs the «climate denier» talking point twice in that second quote, despite easily found evidence that skeptics of catastrophic man - caused global warming do not «deny climate change», as was so humorously pointed out by Lord Monckton in this video starting at the 13:38 point.

Climate - change skeptics point out that the planet has warmed and cooled many times before, but the climate window that has allowed for human life is very narrow, even by the standards of planetary hClimate - change skeptics point out that the planet has warmed and cooled many times before, but the climate window that has allowed for human life is very narrow, even by the standards of planetary hclimate window that has allowed for human life is very narrow, even by the standards of planetary history.

More on Lord Monckton: Climate Change Skeptic Lord Monckton Gets a Point - by - Point Debunking Lord Monckton: Everything You Need to Know (Video) Lord Monckton Calls Youth Climate Activists «Hitler Youth» (Video) Lord Monckton Claims Non-Scientists Shouldn't Talk Climate Science?

On the one hand, he says that any reasonable person should've been skeptical two years ago due to valid points raised by skeptics (despite these points having been dealt with by mainstream climate science for * years *).

I'll just say that I've seen denialists pointing at some of this articles in The Guardian as a proof that climate science is under question (because EVEN The Guardian has now concerns) and I think people who don't pay much attention to it have actually been misled by the headlines and the comments from skeptics.

What I obviously point out time and again is that there is no evidence proving skeptic climate scientists knew catastrophic man - caused global warming was settled science but were corrupted by giant wads of illicit cash which caused them to spew industry - created / directed lies.