Sentences with phrase «points given per»

In New Hampshire, all violations and driving infractions have a certain number of points given per incident.

If you go to evreward and type in Macys in the search box, you will see a list of portals and how many miles / points they give per dollar of your purchase:

Not exact matches

Shumpert is also a decent three - point shooter and gives the Cavs another outside threat the defense must respect and since the trades and LeBron's return no team is making more 3 - pointers per game.

As Jerry Brown, associate partner in PricewaterhouseCooper's consulting practice, recalls, «I saw a presentation given by one of the major studios where they pointed out that when they sold a [game] for a console they expected to collect $ 50 per consumer and that was it.

She was paid $ 10 per hour and given just enough work to get her up to the point (but not over) where she still remained ineligible to receive health benefits.

In the case of Uber, $ 40 per share would merely be the starting point for the tender offer — a price that would gradually increase in a type of auction if there aren't enough sellers at a given price.

The reason this was done was because star wood gives out less points but requires less points, per category.

The Chase Sapphire Reserve ® gives you 3 points per dollar spent on travel and dining and 1 point per dollar on all other spending.

Given your belief that Berkshire's intrinsic value continues to exceed its book value with the difference continuing to widen over time, are we at a point where it makes sense to consider buying back stock at a higher break point that Berkshire currently has in place and would you ever consider stepping in buying back shares that did dip down below 1.2 times book value per share even if that prior years» figure had not yet been released?

It comes with a sign - up bonus to give your Ultimate Rewards account a quick boost, and it earns 2X points per dollar on all travel and dining purchases.

The Chase shopping portal gives you extra points per $ 1 at over 200 popular stores.

Given that Starpoints are worth on average 2.4 cents per point, you should transfer points to an airline loyalty program only if you're able to use the resulting rewards for better value.

All other purchases give just 1 point per dollar.

Given an absence of inflationary pressures and weak economic conditions, the ECB cut its key policy rate by 50 basis points to 2 per cent in June.

The card itself gives you 2 points per dollar spent with Southwest Airlines and 1 point per dollar spent everywhere else.

That means the US central bank is halfway to its target, given the current fed funds rate of 1.75 per cent and the 150 basis points in hikes the Fed has implemented since December 2016.

The Chase Sapphire Preferred ® Card is most beneficial to individuals with high dining and travel spending, as it gives 2 points per $ 1 in these categories.

The points can be used for travel purchases as well as be transferred to airline and hotel partners, which can give you even more value per point.

The result gave some indication of the numerical strength of various religious bodies, but the amazing statistic from a long - term point of view is that an astounding 96 per cent of the respondents expressed a religious preference of some kind!

Though concern for natural law is not wrong per se, Westberg points out that Aquinas himself gave very little space to it in his lengthy Summa.

If you plug the nutrition information for the recipe into the SP calculator it will count the nutrition information for these foods in the overall points per serving, often giving you a completely different result than the recipe builder.

Final committee No. 2 Oklahoma gave up more points per game than UCF did and had a worse defense, according to both schedule - adjusted S&P + and the events of New Year's Day.

They are second in the League through 4 weeks in points allowed, as they are giving up an average of just 60 points per Game.

Team AEPi FR (Griffin Lowy) really gave everything they had on Sunday night despite losing their Week 3 game to Team Delts JR (Grant Miller), topping their average of 61.3 points per game for the season.

Playing a major role in the team's success in both the regular and postseason, he averaged 18.1 points and 5.3 rebounds per game and gave New York a go - to scoring threat off the bench when Carmelo Anthony was off the floor.

Although the Eagles ranked third nationally in total offense last year, the defense gave up 22 points per game.

Through Sunday, Jamison had averaged 25.0 points over his last 11 games, and along with senior guard Shammond Williams (15.0 points, 4.8 assists per game), gives the Tar Heels (20 - 1, 6 - 1) one of the most potent inside - outside attacks in the nation.

We'd get back to 30 points per game, while giving up less than 20.

The Raiders were giving up 26.2 points per game entering Week 14, the sixth - worst average in the league.

They gave up 103.1 points per 100 possessions, third - best in the league behind the Rockets and Warriors.

... One key to the stellar play of Hornets center Vlade Divac (12.9 points, 9.2 rebounds and 2.2 blocks per game through Sunday): He gave up his habit of 10 to 15 cigarettes a day... After being traded twice in three days last month — from the Mavericks to the Nets to the Lakers — swingman George McCloud made only nine field goals in his first nine games with L.A. Twice this season with Dallas he made nine field goals in one game... «The pick - and - roll has been killing us,» says Kings guard Mitch Richmond.

The Cardinals faced third - and - five on their own 42 in the second quarter last Saturday at home against a defense that had dominated the previous five years, giving up 17.0 points per game, second - best in the nation.

If you look at our record in 2015, with 10 wins and two losses from 12 games, earning 2.5 points per game, that would give 95 points from 38, the highest Premier League points total ever.

OTOH i think we could get 3 points and let welbeck / walcott / ramsey get better & give ozil / welbeck a rest: welbeck [giroud on 60th min if necessary] sanchez, caz, walcott ramsey coq gibbs gabriel per bellerin ospina

«At some point I will have to settle in a place but until that time, wherever I'm put I will give it 100 per cent and I just enjoy playing football.

Stupid ratings as per usual, Wenger again and his ridiculous formation, we can not afford to fall behind too far from the leader and we continue to give away 2 points.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

interestingly, we gave up 128 points per 100 possessions when Amir was on the floor and only 100 per 100 possessions when Ersan was.

After their opening game against Virginia Tech, Boise State's average margin of victory is 38.8 points per game which is why giving a lot of points hasn't scared away too many bettors.

«J.J. and Shelden won't have to pace themselves,» says Krzyzewski, who hopes a 10 - man rotation will enable Duke to extend its defense, crank up the offense (into the 80s or 90s from last season's 78.2 points per game) and give all the starters time for a breather.

New England has ripped off six straight wins while giving up only 12.5 points per...

And in a bowl loss to Appalachian State, they were dominant on a per - play basis (6.9 yards per play to 5.1) but gave up a kick return touchdown and allowed App State to play keep - away (total snaps: ASU 82, UT 54) in a three - point loss.

In those three games, the Broncos gave up 16, 18, and 10 points respectively (14.7 points per game) to teams that ranked fourth (Steelers), third (Patriots), and first (Panthers) in scoring this year.

Corprate Man, The point you make about not being able to land our top CB targets is, IMHO, the reason Per was given this extension.

The best - ever Spartan team gave up just seven points per game and maneuvered through a tricky slate until the Rose Bowl against UCLA, when a two - point conversion attempt — with a tie and possibly the national title on the line — came up just short.

The Lions figure to recover nicely from giving up 36.2 points per game and missing the playoffs.

USC gave up 29 points per game in September, then 19 in October, and 19 in November.

Big 12 teams are often stereotyped — because of the sheer number of plays and max - tempo offenses, defenses have no choice but to give up large numbers of raw yards and points — but on a per - play basis, they often check out well.

Boise State gave up just 12.6 points per game in that 2008 season, and made two BCS bowl games (winning both of them) during his time with the school.

USC's defense was one of just three in the Pac - 12 that gave up fewer points than the Huskies 2013, averaging 21.2 points per game.