Sentences with phrase «points in the future if»

I am not scared of a really small man telling me there's an invisible, inaudible, intangible man standing behind me who will pound me at some undefined point in the future if I don't do what that small man tells me to do right now.

You don't need to give your notice before you know whether you visa will come through and you can always come back to the country you left at some point in the future if you want to.

I am an advisor / investor to ThriveMarket.com and may make money at some point in the future if Thrive Market does well financially.

The widespread nature of Celiac and gluten sensitivity makes it highly probable that you will have a friend or relative with this condition come to dinner or a party at your home at some point in the future if it hasn't happened already!

I get that I am theoretically giving up the right to resell that book or that it could cease to exist at some point in the future if the retailer or publisher decides to yank my license (all the more reason to buy books without DRM, if that is a concern).

I would like to possibly buy back into ABT at some point in the future if the situation is right (yield is higher).

You understand that false information may be grounds for not hiring you or for immediate termination of employment at any point in the future if you are hired.

But I also suggest that Nintendo retain the control of when those games are available on those consoles so that it does not jeapordise Nintendo coming back as a major console maker at some point in the future if they so wish.

Not exact matches

«If you can't predict the future, then it doesn't make any more sense at any given point in time.»

According to analysts, if and how Tim Hortons alters its expansion strategy and capital structure will likely be the main point of contention amongst the company's shareholders in the near future.

If Barcelona or Catalonia lost the presence of large anchor companies, that would have an impact on the startup ecosystem, since large companies are customers and sources of talent and future founders,» he wrote, but the strong pace of acquisitions seems to point in the opposite direction.

So while there could be a better entry point in the future for long - term investors, if these analysts price targets end up being right, then there is a chance you can get a boost in the short - term too.

«There was a point, he told me, where after spending nearly $ 200,000, he felt like, «I am completely illiterate in something that I have so many ideas in, in an area that is the future, and in an area where if I want to continue building things then I need to be able to speak the language,»» Poonawala said.

Note these points and remind them of it in the future if and when it's achieved.

If this error turns out to be an actual mistake Reinhart - Rogoff made, well, all I can hope is that future historians note that one of the core empirical points providing the intellectual foundation for the global move to austerity in the early 2010s was based on someone accidentally not updating a row formula in Excel.

In fact, 70 % of those who plan to buy an iPhone at some point in the future won't even consider buying a smartphone from another vendor, even if the alternative device is substantially cheapeIn fact, 70 % of those who plan to buy an iPhone at some point in the future won't even consider buying a smartphone from another vendor, even if the alternative device is substantially cheapein the future won't even consider buying a smartphone from another vendor, even if the alternative device is substantially cheaper.

However, we have been getting jerked around by the SBA for nearly 9 months now and we are at a point where we may have to cut our losses if we can not secure the remainder of necessary funding in the very near future.

Of course, you should come prepared for the meeting with a few thoughts and talking points, but don't get discouraged from sharing your opinion in the future if you're wrong about something.

And as a few of your readers pointed out, odds are there will still be something left from my investable assets as well, as they would only be exhausted, under the 3 % rule, if my future is as bad as the worst 50 - year period in history.

If there is anyone in this room that believes that a reasonable forecast for the U.S. or British economy at any future date would be represented by a trend line constructed through to 2007 from any previous point, I have a bridge I want to sell you,» Summers quipped.

I would love to own rental property at some point in the future, perhaps keeping my current condo as a rental unit if / when I move to a house.

That and the long - term technical setup both point to a durable bottom in cryptocurrencies in the near future, even if the current rally attempt fails.

There's no point in securing the planet's future if it's at the expense of our own.

I will point it out in the future if I believe it is once again relevant to our communication thread.

If we allow Blake's apocalyptic vision to stand witness to a radical Christian faith, there are at least seven points from within this perspective at which we can discern the uniqueness of Christianity: (1) a realization of the centrality of the fall and of the totality of fallenness throughout the cosmos; (2) the fall in this sense can not be known as a negative or finally illusory reality, for it is a process or movement that is absolutely real while yet being paradoxically identical with the process of redemption; and this because (3) faith, in its Christian expression, must finally know the cosmos as a kenotic and historical process of the Godhead's becoming incarnate in the concrete contingency of time and space; (4) insofar as this kenotic process becomes consummated in death, Christianity must celebrate death as the path to regeneration; (5) so likewise the ultimate salvation that will be effected by the triumph of the Kingdom of God can take place only through a final cosmic reversal; (6) nevertheless, the future Eschaton that is promised by Christianity is not a repetition of the primordial beginning, but is a new and final paradise in which God will have become all in all; and (7) faith, in this apocalyptic sense, knows that God's Kingdom is already dawning, that it is present in the words and person of Jesus, and that only Jesus is the «Universal Humanity,» the final coming together of God and man.

The general conclusion is, however, that a small number of specially trained ministers will be needed much more in the near future than in the past, and that the chaplaincy model helps with most of these up to a point but must be supplemented and altered if some of the most genuine needs are to be met.

will have to be assumed and telescoped; but I will concentrate on what I think are critical questions — critical in the sense that they represent, at least in my opinion, points on which greater clarity is required if the community of Christ's discipleship is to move into the post-Christendom future with something like apostolic confidence.

It would be great if we could discuss the different positions at some point in the future with out some becoming disagreeable with each other.

Although Peirce does insist that there is divergence from law and increasing variety in the world, and that at no time in the finite future will there be no aberrancy from law (6.91), he also insists that growth is continually expanding into law and that if we were to reach a point in the infinitely distant future, we would have reached a state of no indeterminacy or chance but a complete reign of law (6.33).

The epistemology of process is not empirical, if by empirical is meant the absolutization of the present, for the basis of knowledge in our view is the future, Of course, in order to know the future, one must know the present and the past, but not in and for themselves, since the present and the past do not point to themselves but to the future.

Scripture often refers to events that will happen in the future as if they had already happened in order to emphasize a point.

For what point can there be in living with eyes fixed constantly and laboriously upon the future, if this future, even though it take the form of a Noosphere, must finally become a zero?

tthe next major turning point in the evolution of mankind will be the shedding off of our need for religion... if we make it to that point, we may have a future that includes a rational.

If not now, then at some point in the not too distant future.

With Ben Watson back in the fold, I think they can wait to pick a TE later so Payton can mold him for the future but if Payton is 100 % behind Goedert, Hurst or Gesicki, I'll be fine with that but right now, I think they may opt to go WR (Kirk or Moore) than TE in the first round at this point.

I agree that Mair only getting about 3 minutes is a little silly, but I think Tedenby is really an important future player for us, and whats the point in screwing with his development, if the season is lost?

we were awful for 60 mins and fortunate to be just one down and the good... we took a point from being decent for 30 mins all but securing third place... As for realism it's simple... There is no way a real arsenal fan could watch that performance and be confident that we will be challenging for title in 12 months time... So if that is what we want the realist fan asks what needs to change... and if we rule out the first best option... which as a realist I do... to get rid of wenger... then in our second best world it's a matter of where we need to strengthen... Sadly at the point realism breaks down because in the absence of first best option we are in the fantasy world of the cheese eating surrender monkey where 11 yr olds are zee future of zee club

He was then asked outright if he could ever seeing himself returning to Arsenal at some point in the future, and he replied: «You never know,»

Just analyze Wenger's statement today, «I didn't come out against Benzema», its not the same as saying that I did not show or I don't have any interest in Benzema, and to top it off when ask about ruling out any future purchases (this within the context of an additional striker) Arsene pointed out what he currently has at his disposal and think they are sufficient, while adding that if an opportunity to strengthen presents itself, he would not be adverse to pursue it; this seems a bit contradictory and points to someone who is being a bit evasive.

Stats may only point towards the past instead of giving a reliable indication of what will happen in the future, but if you're a fan of spotting trends that may or not be developing, there seems to be encouraging news for Gunners supporters ahead of this evening's match.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

It makes sense from Arsenal's point of view if Holding and Chambers can get game time together in central defence for England at any level, weather they are the future for England and Arsenal depends on how good they can become.

So doesn't even matter if I'm wrong and he makes 10 new signings with Wenger in charge doesn't make a blind bit of difference they would all be played out of position until the point they've become future deadwood like the current crop.

Both could surely fit in well at one of La Liga's big two, but for the moment it seems Ramos is keen for his club to prioritise a move for Eriksen over Kane if they are to raid Tottenham at any point in the near future.

Having won all there is to win at Bayern, it wouldn't be a surprise if he considered a new challenge at some point in the future.

Sure, a decent grounding in the basics of football might seem like a better idea, but if a kid can nail the Cruyff turn while not really knowing how to do anything else, then the chance is there for that kid, at some point in the future, to reproduce not just the original turn but also the element of surprise.

Tyler Eilenberg had 25 points in this one and if they can get future performances like that, they will be just fine!

A torn pectoral muscle has his stock dipping heading into the draft, but if the Bengals think they can have him healthy at some point in training camp, then he should be the one they pick to be their future at center.

much like when a country can't divulge highly classified information publicly for obvious economic and military reasons, a professional soccer organization must keep certain things in - house so they don't devalue a player, expose a weakness, provide info that could give an opposing club leverage in future negotiations and / or give them vital intel regarding a future match, but when dishonesty becomes the norm the relationship between cub and fan will surely deteriorate... in our particular case, our club has done an absolutely atrocious job when it comes to cultivating a healthy and honest relationship with the media or their fans, which has contributed greatly to our lack of success in the transfer market... along with poor decisions involving weekly wages, we can't ever seem to get true market value for most of our outgoing players and other teams seem to squeeze every last cent out of us when we are looking to buy; why wouldn't they, when you go to the table with such a openly desperate and dysfunctional team like ours, you have all the leverage; made even worse by the fact that who wouldn't want to see our incredibly arrogant and thrifty manager squirm during the process... the real issue at this club is respect, a word that appears to be entirely lost on those within our hierarchy... this is the starting point from which all great relationships between club and supporters form... this doesn't mean that a team can't make mistakes along the way, that's just human nature, it's about how they chose to deal with these situations that will determine if this relationship flourishes or devolves..

The Huddle Report has been scoring mock drafts for years now, assigning one point to an analyst for each player they correctly pick in the first round and additional two points if they correctly match a player to his future team.