Sentences with phrase «points needed per»

The number of points needed per flight is 100 % dependent on the price of that exact flight.

By clicking on the color - coded pins on the map, you can see the hotel category and the number of points needed per night.

Not exact matches

What you need to look at is the trend, and not really at the point - per - point basis,» he said.

In order for it to be worthwhile, you need to spend heavily in dining and travel categories, where this card awards you 2x points per $ 1.

You will no longer earn points on gas purchases, but, anytime you need to fly, rent a car, or stay at a hotel, you will earn 3 points per $ 1.

If the starting point is the annual level of employment for 2014, employment would need to be 1.2 % per year on average, similar to that recorded over the June 2009 to September 2015.

Well, bearing in mind that we start our analysis with a projection that Canada's economic potential is likely to grow by only around 1.5 per cent, which is not very inspiring, we need to take every decimal point of potential growth more seriously than we have in the past.

He pointed to the biotechnology investment incentive tax credit — which analysts say costs more than $ 300,000 per job and has historically gone to investors in well capitalized, mid-stage companies not the start - ups it's supposed to help — as a program in need of change.

At the time of its December meeting, the available information confirmed the assessment that a less expansionary policy setting was needed, and the cash rate was therefore raised by a further 25 basis points, to 5.25 per cent.

I got the idea for the sauce from Lindsay's new cookbook — her almond sauce though (for 2 servings) calls for 1/2 a cup of sesame oil (I need to ask her if that is right, because that's a lot of oil and sesame oil can be very overpowering) which would have meant the sauce in her dish would be 17 points per serving, without the food included.

Choose one options per bullet point and modify them as needed.

Healthy foods in convenient packaging is a consumer need that is growing in momentum, according to Datamonitor, with 59 per cent of European and US consumers seeking a combination of the two selling points.

But Stanford exploded for 46 points per game and 8 yards per play in this span, and when you expect to see a breakout, you don't need as much evidence to assume a breakout has occurred.

To equal the 79 points we got last time we would need 2.5 points per game between now and May.

point is, if he is the feature striker, then that will not win a league, when this team won the league, thierry henri scored 30 goals in the prem alone, and averaged 26 per year over 5 straight years, we need that kind of production,

Didn't think I'd need to point it out that that was sarcasm and both of them are in the top - 5 in minutes per chance creation... But alas, seems I do.

Monreal is not a cb chambers is, bellerins pretty good at rb, per needs to leave the club, (tough one this personally pointing the finger atone player), whats wrong with campbell?

need a big statement of intent today... man utd already losing momentum... need 100 per cent effort and concentration... intensity of spuds man city game was impressive... 3 points today needed before break

It was a very unhappy New Year for Arsenal fans as we saw our beloved team drop precious points to a direct rival when we were beaten 2 - 0 away at Southampton, but Per Mertesacker says that that was a blessing in disguise and taught the players that they needed to be more solid defensively rather than going gung - ho into the attack.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Over a 12 - year career, Crawford has averaged 15.3 points per game and at 6» 5, will provide the Clippers with much - needed backcourt size.

Club captain Per Mertesacker and vice-captain Laurent Koscielny will return in short order, and while this may not solve the problem completely — one's old and slow, the other's semi-permacrocked, and Arsenal gonna Arsenal — we need to at least see Arsenal failing at full strength before we can truly point and laugh.

It boils down to this, if we only buy in one key player per season we are NEVER going to be able to compete with the elite clubs and despite there being a few good points in your argument above its worth noting that only 11 million was spent last summer when it was as clear as the noses on anyones face that we needed a better spine up the middle of the pitch, AW has offered and given Theo a new contract at twice the wages he was on and he is without doubt the highest paid flop in the team.

This is made harder when you need to average around 2.25 points per game over the course of the season to be in contention for the title.

Man City currently averages 2.4 points gained per game and without another head to head fixture it suggests Tottenham needs to win out.

Note that only exposed skin needs to be sprayed, so minimize contact with the skin by covering up (per point # 1).

Although there's no hard and fast rule about the amount of milk your child should be drinking at this point, it's a good idea to consider that formula - fed babies need around 400 ml of cow's milk at this point, and that breastfed babies should be down to two to three breastfeeds per day by one year.

The «breeder males» don't have much incentive to change anything or even question the way things work as they're getting their sexual needs met per the list of 20 points above.

Over the past week I've heard the following arguments - they want to lift the poor out of tax, actually the main beneficiaries of this policy won't be the poor because they don't pay tax, but will instead be the middle class, anyway, on a point of principle we need to simplify the tax system, and we need to cut public services by # 80 billion per year, or maybe we don't.

He said the Zaria water works was built in 1939 with an initial capacity of 10m litres and is currently not functioning, pointing out that in 1975, it was upgraded to 50m litres but the operating capacity of both the two could not meet the 140m litres per day need of the people of Zaria and environs.

That analysis of published large randomized trials calculated that each 77 - point drop in LDL cholesterol (a 2 millimole per liter drop) reduced the risk of a major cardiovascular event — heart attack, stroke or the need for a coronary - clearing procedure — by 45 percent.

To achieve the high - definition needed for the big screen, Domino takes images which have been shot on movie film and converts them into a video format by breaking each of the 24 frames per second into a mosaic of 3000 × 2000 picture points.

Stephen's rate of speech is down to about one word per minute, and while I am making slight advances in the technology he is using, the nerve decay has now reached the point where we need to move to some new technology.

The other point for me is that too many people believe already that they need long hours of training to get in shape and be healthy so they don't even start because they don't believe they can do anything in 20 minutes per day.

At this point you know how many calories you need to consume per day.

Only consider modifying the routine to 6 days per week if you're experienced enough to handle the increased frequency and volume (i.e. at least a strong intermediate), and if you're comfortable enough with programming to make the needed changes to volume / intensity (as I'll expand on in point 2).

If you've read a diet book, seen a nutritionist or hired a personal trainer at any point during that time, you've probably been told that in order to lose weight, you need to eat 5 - 6 small meals per day.

The first thing that needs to be pointed out, is that both shakes have less than 200 calories per serving.

Knowing how many grams of each macronutrient you need to eat per day is the starting point for IIFYM.

Me: At this point (age 64), it's not likely that you are capable of putting on the amount of muscle needed to get back to having arms that size again (it would require about a 15 - 20 pound weight gain per inch, which makes it nearly impossible for most guys of any age to reach arms that size).

And, the starting point for figuring out exactly how many calories you need to eat per day revolves around something called your calorie maintenance level.

There is a point of diminishing returns, but most active people need at least 0.6 - 0.8 g protein per lean (not total) lb of bodyweight.

If you aren't sure how this stacks up to your prescribed daily amount check out my post on How Much Fiber You Need Per Day to point you in the right direction!

The issue that needs to be resolved prior to the March meeting is whether or not some specific number of minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity per day can be pointed to as particularly important for the prevention of excessive weight gain.

The most expensive of the products tested, it lost points on cost effectiveness — you'll only need one wipe per eye, but each costs about $ 1.

According to the models comparing high - scoring F schools with low - scoring D schools, to achieve the same 5 - point gain in math that the threat of vouchers accomplished, Florida schools would need to increase per - pupil spending by $ 3,484 at previously failing schools.

The current research consensus points to high - poverty schools facing disproportionate challenges: that is, to get the same outcome, they need more resources per student — and per poor student.

At this point, the department may need to provide the service jointly with another district or contract out for the service on a per - pupil basis.

Growing population As the RIBA report points out, a booming UK population has meant that 250,000 more school places are needed now than in 2000, 90 per cent of them at primary level.

But the «we need to spend more» mantra has been blown up countless times, most recently by Minnesota reformer / writer Chris Stewart who pointed out that North High, one of the poorest performing schools in Minneapolis, receives budget allocations that amount to $ 17,460 per student, while Southwest High, a school ranked among the best in the nation, gets just $ 7,782 per student.