Despite numerous negotiating sessions, the UFT has been unable to reach an agreement with the Department of Education (DOE) on key
points of a new teacher evaluation system.
Not exact matches
In response to the mayor's most recent attempt to
point the finger at the union for the breakdown
of evaluation talks, UFT President Michael Mulgrew observed, «Most people would be embarrassed that the state's highest education official has directly contradicted their statements about a
new teacher evaluation system, but not the mayor.»
As we head into 2014, with lots
of states and districts rolling out or amping up
new teacher evaluation systems, there are at least four
points worth keeping in mind.
Our study yielded a number
of new findings that
point to potential improvements in the design
of teacher evaluation systems.
Bloomfield's
new teacher evaluation system is a case in
point where many voices, including the input
of the
teachers union, played a role in its successful development.
Martha Keating, Labor Relations Consultant for the Rochester
Teachers Association, says a new scoring system is in place where teachers can accumulate up to 100 points, «Never before has there been a prescribed rating that the observation evaluation counts this much and the state tests count this much and if there was local testing it would cost this much, but the law imposed that on all of the districts in NY State
Teachers Association, says a
new scoring
system is in place where
teachers can accumulate up to 100 points, «Never before has there been a prescribed rating that the observation evaluation counts this much and the state tests count this much and if there was local testing it would cost this much, but the law imposed that on all of the districts in NY State
teachers can accumulate up to 100
points, «Never before has there been a prescribed rating that the observation
evaluation counts this much and the state tests count this much and if there was local testing it would cost this much, but the law imposed that on all
of the districts in NY State.»
Interesting to
point out is the primary research being used to support this
new teacher evaluation system going through: The research
of Harvard's Raj Chetty — the Bloomberg Professor
of Economics [emphasis added, given former NY Mayor Michael Bloomberg's «crusade» to, via VAMs, «turn the teaching profession into corporate - world shape»].
Superintendent John Deasy said this morning that he expects a tentative agreement with UTLA over a
new system of teacher evaluations, as mandated by the court in Doe v. Deasy, at some
point in the next four days — just before the deadline set by the judge.
In Washington, D.C., one
of the first places in the country to use value - added
teacher ratings to fire
teachers,
teacher - union president Nathan Saunders likes to
point to the following statistic as proof that the ratings are flawed: Ward 8, one
of the poorest areas
of the city, has only five percent
of the
teachers defined as effective under the
new evaluation system known as IMPACT, but more than a quarter
of the ineffective ones.
Proponents
point to positive benchmarks: District enrollment is growing; D.C. scores on the National Assessment
of Educational Progress (NAEP) have improved (in some cases at a much faster rate than students in other large urban districts); and
teachers who left the district after receiving low marks on D.C.'s
new teacher evaluation system were replaced with higher - scoring
teachers who boosted student achievement.
The
teachers on the left side
of the bell curve (see below) were more accurately identified this year, and the
teachers on the «right» side became more effective due to the
new and improved
teacher evaluation system constructed by the state... and what might be renamed the Hogwarts Department
of Education, led by Hanna Skandera — the state's Voldemort — who, in this article
pointed out that these results evidence (and I use that term loosely) «that the
system is doing a better job
of pointing out good
teachers.»
For example, despite each district's experience demonstrating that this process has no quick fix, all
point to the benefit
of allowing local districts and unions to tackle the complexities
of teacher improvement through
new evaluation systems.