Only One - Third of Pastors Share «Left Behind» End Times Theology Here's how 1,000 Protestant clergy disagree on the rapture, the Antichrist, and other
points of eschatology.
Arguing the fine
points of eschatology may not have been quite as pleasurable as dancing, but it came close.
As noted earlier, it is at
the point of eschatology that Altizer makes his stand most particularly for the radical uniqueness of Christianity.
Not exact matches
Now it is precisely at this
point that we must acknowledge a seemingly unbridgeable gulf between the worlds
of Oriental mysticism and Biblical
eschatology.
It is doubtful that «realized
eschatology» is a good name for this
point of view, for it suggests that the end
of history has already come and minimizes the futuristic element in the thought
of Jesus.
I have presented a similar
point of view in Ethics and
Eschatology in the Teaching
of Jesus,» Journal
of Religion, 20:359 - 70.
The literary evidence that the expectation
of a «Messiah,» in so far as such an expectation existed at all, took these several forms is indisputable, although at
points meager, and can be found cited in Charles and other writers on Jewish
eschatology.
The notion
of the people, i.e.Minjung, and
of small - scale movements and initiatives which represent them, is from the Christian
point of view partly a socio - ecclesial vision in the sense
of a theological appraisal
of the church as social reality in the larger body politic, and partly
eschatology in the sense
of a vision
of the ends worked out within, and ends which extend beyond, human history.
Both Trent and The Catechism
of the Catholic Church as well as the 1979 Letter on Certain Questions concerning
Eschatology make the
point that any sense
of punishment «is altogether different from the punishment
of the damned.»
Process thinker Francis G. Baur has suggested that the concept
of «thresholds»
of change beyond which a phenomenon is new in ways that transcend and fulfill its antecedents, but does not cease thereby to be in process towards other previously unimaginable dimensions
of being, might mediate at this
point between biblical
eschatology and process - relational cosmology.6 After all, the eschaton is the completion
of God's will for this cosmic epoch, but it is not implied in scripture that there is no life beyond eschaton.
(E.g., Luke 16:19 - 31) Thus, in one
of his most cogent pleas for humanitarian service as the test
of true religion and the crucial
point on which God judges man — «I was hungry» and ye gave me to eat; I was thirsty, and ye gave me to drink; I was a stranger, and ye took me in; naked and ye clothed me; I was sick, and ye visited me; I was in prison, and ye came unto me» (Matthew 25:31 - 46)-- the scenery
of the parable is the old - fashioned
eschatology.
Well, for people who believe the Bible when it says Jesus is coming back, it is quite logical to
point out the amount
of ignorance they displayed in ignoring a passage that is very, very key to end times studies (
eschatology).
This was the main text, so to speak,
of Galilean
eschatology, a prophecy
of the cleansing
of the territory from heathen defilement, and
of the beginning
of the New Age — one thinks
of a modern and somewhat remote parallel, the Bahaist «Dawning
Point of the Praises
of God.»
The starting -
point for a right understanding
of eschatology is the words and deeds
of Jesus.
Of the many points of comparison and contrast that present themselves, we may restrict ourselves to five general areas: evolution, the sacred and the within, eschatology, Christ, and Go
Of the many
points of comparison and contrast that present themselves, we may restrict ourselves to five general areas: evolution, the sacred and the within, eschatology, Christ, and Go
of comparison and contrast that present themselves, we may restrict ourselves to five general areas: evolution, the sacred and the within,
eschatology, Christ, and God.