Sentences with phrase «points of law for»

Answer: Those who work in the private arena often have an underlying passion for the law (the pursuit of justice; fighting for what is right vs blandly arguing points of law for a salary).

Viewing these points of law for a case has the feeling of viewing headnotes.

11.00 am: I draft changes to a trust deed for one of our clients, which I spent most of yesterday researching points of law for.

Thanks to Point of Law for pointing out the relatively new (as of February) Law Weblog from the Times of London.

COMMENT On 15 February 2008 the court certified a point of law for consideration by the House of Lords, but as is customary, refused leave.

On 15 February 2008 the court certified a point of law for consideration by the House of Lords, but as is customary, refused leave.

Not exact matches

For instance, on his blog Baseline Scenario, University of Connecticut law professor James Kwak makes many of the same points as Quittner — the Zuckerberg - Chan donation isn't really a donation at all but a newly formed LLC that will have significant tax benefits for the couple, who will retain almost complete control over their monFor instance, on his blog Baseline Scenario, University of Connecticut law professor James Kwak makes many of the same points as Quittner — the Zuckerberg - Chan donation isn't really a donation at all but a newly formed LLC that will have significant tax benefits for the couple, who will retain almost complete control over their monfor the couple, who will retain almost complete control over their money.

Four years after Canada's Anti-Spam Legislation was enacted, the Ministry of Innovation, Science and Economic Development has pledged to change it, in response to a parliamentary committee, which pointed to glaring flaws that were creating confusion for those trying to comply with the law.

Of course, this raises a thorny issue: How do the agents and prosecutors review the documents for privilege status, if the entire point of privilege is that it's not supposed to be seen by people outside the lawyer's office, particularly members of law enforcemenOf course, this raises a thorny issue: How do the agents and prosecutors review the documents for privilege status, if the entire point of privilege is that it's not supposed to be seen by people outside the lawyer's office, particularly members of law enforcemenof privilege is that it's not supposed to be seen by people outside the lawyer's office, particularly members of law enforcemenof law enforcement?

Indiana is the new battleground for General Motors Company (NYSE: GM) and Tesla Motors Inc (NASDAQ: TSLA), Autoblog wrote, and the point of contention is a new law that would prohibit any manufacturer from being able to hold a dealer license after December 31, 2017.

In fact, the final talking points about the tax bill, which Republicans circulated with the legislative text released last Friday, takes credit for retaining a lot of the current tax law's deductions.

Exactly what is the value of the Law in the Old Testament other than to point out the sinful nature of man and his need for a savior.

Many have pointed out (most recently, Carson Holloway) that the application of natural law to our situation requires the virtue of prudence, a mastery of the details of our circumstances (such as is possible for a human being), with the goals and the weights given to particular considerations by good moral character (or, if you will, a well - formed conscience).

They have had the extraordinary concern for why others are breaking the Sabbath law, but when they are shown that they are not really concerned about the actual law or the actual spirit of that set of laws, they do not admit they are wrong: they plot to «destroy» the one who has pointed this out to them, and to everyone.

Bringing more attention to Regulation Crowdfunding as well as addressing some of the sticking points in the law will help further expand capital access and opportunity for entrepreneurs in every corner of the country.»

Would you care to explain how it is that «primitive sheep herders» as most of you love to derogatorily call them were able to in and of themselves write scripture such that the first two books Genesis & Exodus spell TORAH = LAW for every equidistant letter sequence of the 50th letter... and does the same backwards HAROT for Numbers & Deuteronomy, and the 3rd book that they're pointing towards Leviticus, every 7th letter (7 is God's number for perfection) spells YHWH = The name of God.

In order for this to work, as Bill Nye pointed out there have to be natural laws established and provable, repeatable and predictive of future experimental results that hold up to peer review by the whole world of true scientists.

The point is this: Stop thinking that when you share the Four Spiritual Laws, or the Romans Road, or the plan of salvation, or given an altar call, or invite someone to believe in Jesus for eternal life, or any of the other myriad of things that Christians today call «sharing the gospel,» stop thinking that you have actually shared the Gospel.

You are making it needlessly hard, or are perhaps just plain too stupid to understand such a simple fact as: there's no point debunking myths that virtually no one and no one at all with any real clout believes in anyway, but MUCH point in debunking myths that large numbers of people, including powerful politicians, believe should be the guiding principles for the country's entire political culture and laws.

The point is when you engage in such blatantly out of context proof texting you have already condemned yourself for any one who tries to enforce any part of the law is bound to all of it.

The biblical God establishes laws, rules, codes of conduct much more complex than I laid out for sure, but the point remains the same.

According to our present knowledge of physics, as already pointed out, the Second Law of Thermodynamics presents us in the material realm with the picture of a running - down universe which will ultimately be impossible for human life.

The head of Poland's ruling party Jaroslaw Kaczynski announced the measures after an opinion poll showed a 12 - point drop in support for his right - wing Law and Justice party.

For example, William Paley, already in 1802, in his treatise Natural Theology, pointed out that if the law of gravity had not been a so «called «inverse square law» then the earth and the other planets would not be able to remain in stable orbits around the sun.

Sexual orientation has been the focal point for quite some time for special attention in law to overcome disadvantage (real or alleged) for those with attraction to persons of the same sex; and now, increasingly those who wish to change sex or dress as a person of the opposite sex.

Good point, this does seem like a bit of a stretch; and an article on blue laws would be rather interesting (they make for a healthy seperation of church and state conversation).

For elucidation of the difference of the repetition of the singular to the forming of laws, Deleuze points to Kant's paradigm of the «Categorical Imperative,» which states a individual standard as general law of the same or similar actions, and opposes it to Nietzsche's anti-legalistic postulate of the «eternal return»: It is the repetition of the singular which can not be understood by any law.

Here's the confusion: Arkes proposes and defends the notion that natural law best accounts for our intuitions of equality and justice; Prof. Smolin responds by pointing out that people have believed evil things in the name of natural law.

You cant run America like a business at a certain point «The Workers» have to mean more then the bottom line, or China will be the model of our future, a form of marshal law «Life Credits for eating well, working well, and precedent of making $ 2.00 per hour!

For example, even though the laws in the Pentateuch probably emerged gradually over the course of centuries as people sought ways to live in community, what does it mean that these laws became viewed as stemming directly from God at one point in the life of Moses?

And I ended up rejecting it, because I think that the emphasis on the law completely misses the point of the law and misrepresents the good news message of Jesus that anyone and everyone can have eternal life simply and only by believing in Jesus for it.

For decades, the mystery surrounding the death of Sister Cesnik has haunted officials in Baltimore, but recent details — some uncovered this year in a new journalistic investigation — point to some extremely disturbing possibilities: The young nun may have been murdered because she was preparing to expose a horrific pattern of sexual abuse and even sex trafficking perpetrated by priests and involving law enforcement.

Case in point: For years I predicted that Oregon's assisted suicide law would not result in doctors and patients with long standing relationships working out what is best for end - of - life caFor years I predicted that Oregon's assisted suicide law would not result in doctors and patients with long standing relationships working out what is best for end - of - life cafor end - of - life care.

Ten years earlier, in Bowers v. Hardwick, the Court had upheld the power of a state to make sodomy a crime; but now, as Justice Scalia pointed out, the Court was willing to strike down a law merely for «disfavoring homosexual conduct.»

The element of creativity, which is not accounted for by the so - called laws of nature, and which points to the organic character of the universe or its life as a whole, gives us a clue to God's transcendent functioning.

He also holds to inspiration and inerrancy (as do I), and he also holds to the Mosaic authorship of the Pentateuch, but has found a compelling way to show that Moses was actually undermining the law and pointing out that it was not what God wanted or intended for His people.

At the end of the Second World War the Nuremberg trials for those guilty of war crimes highlighted the point that it was not acceptable to justify one's actions by claiming you were following orders or laws.

Instead, as I point out in the Commentary on Luke 6:1 - 5, Jesus was showing that the purpose of this law was to provide for those who were in need, and Jesus was also showing that in Him, a new Priesthood was being inaugurated.

More to the point, just as William Paley, in his perverse way, acted as a kind of accidental midwife to Darwin's theory, so too I think the speculations of Michael J. Behe and William A. Dembski (and others, many of whom belong to the Discovery Institute) will lead not to a more robust theism but to a new impetus to find adequate explanatory laws for chemical complexity.

As for pro-life lawyers, most of them did not foresee how far the Supreme Court would extend Roe and Doe over the years — even to the point of striking down laws designed to protect late - term, healthy, viable babies.

So when Jesus quotes the law in Mark 7:10 about putting children to death for cursing their parents, He is not necessarily quoting it with approval, but is instead pointing out how the religious leaders were using the law to do the exact opposite of what the law said.

Perhaps the Occupy Movement will bring us to the point where we once again as a society decide we want to uphold the rule of law, not just for the petty crimes of the poor, but also the high crimes of the rich and their politician puppets like Blair.

Scientific laws and constants that govern our earth appear fine - tuned to exactly what's needed for life to exist — even atheist and agnostic scientists have written books that question whether this fine - tuning points to the existence of God.

To Ken Margo: I am totally agree with you about this evil thing going around the earth... this evil minded people is there everywhere regardless of faith... that was not what i was trying to say... my point was to be able to recognize the One True God who is Unseen and who has no partners as He is not in need of any partners but we the creation is in need of Him... thats all... I wish I could do something to stop all these taking place around the earth... I think we human fear the fed laws more than we fear the laws of our Creator, for example not to associate any partner with Him, taking the life of others, drug dealing, human trafficking, believing in hereafter and so on... I remember a story that I was talking with one of my friends... I was telling him look we all obey the law of the land so much like for example when we drive and no one moves even an inch when there is a school bus stop to pick / drop kids as it is a fed laws but when it comes to the laws of our Creator, we don't care... like having physical relationship outside of marriage and many more... then he said something nice... he said that its because we see the consequence of breaking the law of the land but we do not see the punishment of hereafter even though it is mentioned very details in Quran, it even gives pictures of hereafter....

One of our main points in setting out this framework is the claim that in some deep sense, to do physics is to find laws that relate (E) to (E1) for separable events E and E1 (including of course the special case that E and E1 pertain to the same substance or object in the naive sense of those words.

The point is that if a law makes it so that no one has to pay out of pocket for contraceptives, EXCEPT those who work for some organization that doesn't believe in contraception, you create an inequality.

They point to her 2 - 1 margin with Latinos over Obama in the 2008 primary and the latest party platform, which calls for a path to citizenship «for law - abiding families who are here,» the end of immigration raids against children and families, due process for «those fleeing violence in Central America,» and to rescind statutory bans on immigrants who modify their status in the country.

And it would fail to establish that point for the same reason that the law would not be justified in receding from the protection of the children even if those feelings changed overnight and 95 percent of the public now «despised their children.»

For Christians would not Jesus requirement of who can stone (execute) a person according to the law, kind of make your point moot?

For example, as the result of law suits instituted by public - interest groups, the courts held that whenever broadcasters present a particular point of view on a matter of public importance, they also must provide opportunities for opposing viewpoints to be presentFor example, as the result of law suits instituted by public - interest groups, the courts held that whenever broadcasters present a particular point of view on a matter of public importance, they also must provide opportunities for opposing viewpoints to be presentfor opposing viewpoints to be presented.