Not exact matches
Underlying this erroneous tendency, as Faith has
pointed out many times over the last forty years, is the implicit or explicit denial
of the transcendence
of God, the Divinity
of Christ, the historical objectivity
of revelation and the authority
of the Church in matters
of faith and
morals, and also the denial
of the spiritual soul as a
principle of existence that is distinct from yet integrates the material within the unity
of our human nature.
Such values, while not all present at every
point of Old Testament morality, do in fact underlie the bulk
of the
moral norms and
principles we find there.
Although space will not permit exploration
of the
point here, it is important to note that Christian thought about just war predated the rise
of the modern state system in the 17th century, and rests on fundamental
moral principles not essentially tied to that system.
With the value - laden concept
of organism as our starting
point, there is a hope
of having a single set
of principles which encompass all forms
of experience, physiology and psychology, including
morals, politics and aesthetics.
Indeed, everybody holds certain
principles of «elemental faith»: for example, that the world has some kind
of order to it, and that we have some kind
of moral responsibility Elemental faith and other forms
of secular faith provide «
points of contact» for Christians trying to explain saving faith.
In Kohlberg's model, he exemplified «stage six»
moral reasoning: autonomous, conscience - oriented morality
pointing toward universal
principles of justice.
At least at the level
of principle,
principle never eschewed, it has always acknowledged both the freedom for temporal affairs to be self - regulating and the right for itself to keep a critical outlook on them and to assess
moral, political, and economic practice from the
point of view
of ethics.
On the most important
points the
moral principles of the Decalogue remain basic.
The second
point is to draw on an analogy with language and ask whether there might be something like a universal
moral grammar, a set
of principles that every human is born with.
It was Mann's
point of view that children in the common school were to receive a common
moral education based on the general
principles of the Bible and on common virtues.
To
point out this elementary fact is not, obviously, to draw any
moral equivalence between injustices: it is to insist only on what Herbert Wechsler rightly proclaimed, decades ago, should be an animating value
of all constitutional adjudicaton: the development
of general, neutral,
principles.