Sentences with phrase «points on both sides of the argument»

A reverse mortgage can be viewed from several perspectives with points on both sides of the argument.

Not exact matches

I would like to point out that those from both sides of the argument on belief have one similarity... the lack of tolerance.

While the recent form of the Under - 21s side might be a strong argument against that with a group of talented young players on show, the point he makes about the Italian, Spanish and French leagues providing an obvious spine of homegrown players in their respective All - Star teams is true.

As Larry Summers has pointed out, and to those of us on the Keynesian side of the argument have suggested all along, there is just no defence for ploughing on with the present policies except Tory dogma.

Hundreds of documents have now been filed by both sides, and after hearing these oral arguments on key points of contention, the judges are expected to make a ruling that could divide the intellectual property, give it all to one side, or even decide that neither party deserves the patents.

The arguments surrounding global warming have become so polarised that in my opinion there is no longer a genuine attempt to get to the truth through orignial research, but simply a process of point scoring by either side going on.

My point is simply this: why argue so vehemently against someone who seems to be pretty much on your side of the health argument?

However, the reason these kinds of questions are tricky is because the questioner, from his / her point of view tells me the critical information (critical from his or her point of view)-- and the folks on the other side of the argument would have provided me with other information that they think matters.

Such organization of arguments from the strongest to the weakest will help your readers better understand your point as well as it will convince them in to take your side on the issue / topic.

At first, start the writing by choosing a right topic and after selecting a topic, you need to provide solid information to support your own point of views on this matter and be prepared for any argument that you may receive from the opposite side.

Most, on both sides of the argument, agree that at this point in time, for the ERA to be passed into law it would require re-ratification by the states, as the original 7 - year period has long expired.

As James has pointed out, there are good arguments on both sides of the «tiny type» divide.

It is necessary to picture the point of view of the audience and the side of the argument they are on.

There are plenty of other arguments and debates going on around the Internet for both sides, but the point is that it has become a hot topic, and one that has had huge ramifications on the gaming market with the introduction of things like Online Passes and even the removal of content from the game itself.

P2's Dylan Burns said both sides of the argument had points, and touched on other observations about the whole thing being subjective anyway.

For a great overview of both sides of the argument (framed around the biofuels industry), I recommend you look at two Green Inc. posts framing the debate, one today on the industry point of view that intensified agriculture can cut land use, and one from last week on the opposing view.

The flip side of this is acknowledging valid points that are on the other side of the argument.

I can see little point in making vague unquantifiable statements of the above kind, beyond establishing your position on one side or another of the argument.

David — You quoted only part of my comment, but I cited both sides of that argument in order to suggest that it is the evidence on that point that would dictate the choice of the most prudent hypotheses to evaluate.

He pointed to several reasons why that number could be skewed and he's a recognized figure on your side of the argument.

If there is one comment that makes a strong argument on a particular point and many comments that argue the opposite side of that point with weak technical or purely emotional arguments who wins?

The point of my argument was to show that if that were true then the center of this circular orbit would have to be on the opposite side of the Sun from the barycenter.

But arguments over the precise value of climate sensitivity duck the wider point, which is that even if we're lucky and climate sensitivity is on the low side of scientists» estimates, we're still heading for a substantial level of warming by the end of the century if greenhouse gas emissions aren't addressed, as the IPCC has highlighted.

James Delingpole makes the point very clearly at the end of the entry on «Global Warming» in his book How to be Right: «if the climate change doom mongers are really so sure all the evidence is on their side, why are they so keen to stifle any arguments which threaten to prove them wrong?»

There are valid arguments on both sides, as purpose - built electric bikes are said to be better able to handle the additional torque and stresses that electric drive systems put on the frames and components, while the kits that enable conversion of a conventional bicycle into an electric bike allows cyclists to use the bikes they already own and ride as the starting point.

I find this ironic given that you are presumably on the same side of the argument as Dan Kahan who is quoted as saying [T] here's good reason to believe that the self - righteous and contemptuous tone with which the «scientific consensus» point is typically advanced («assault on reason,» «the debate is over» etc.) deepens polarization.

Without delving into and trying to rebut all of the arguments on the other side, I'd simply make the following three points:

There are two practice points to take note of from this decision: (1) even though it is not in the Rules, the Divisional Court has an «administrative practice» that counsel should be aware of that requires leave to file a reply factum, and (2) when a party is drafting their factum, they need to anticipate what the other side might say in response - unless it is a completely «new» issue raised in response, a moving party on a leave to appeal motion will not be able to respond to the particular arguments made by the other side.

It was the point which chiefly occupied the attention of the counsel on both sides in the argument — and the judgment which this court must render upon both errors is precisely the same.