Sentences with phrase «points required per»

The bottom number is the points required per night if you stay for 5 nights:
4 Minimum 5,000 Scotia Rewards points required per redemption for a travel or travel - related purchase (the «Travel Purchase»).
The fewer points required per dollar, the more value you are receiving for those points.

Not exact matches

One - way flights are often more expensive on a per - mile basis than round - trip, but they don't require extra points.
I found that at the point I'd be ready and comfortable to retire, my expenses would be $ 1,960 per month, requiring a portfolio of $ 588k at a 4 % withdrawal rate — much less than Joe's $ 750k.
The reason this was done was because star wood gives out less points but requires less points, per category.
The conference organiser, Pareto Securities, showed a chart pointing to an additional 13 million barrels of oil supply per day required to meet declines in existing production (compared with current daily production of 96 million barrels) by 2020.
The one exception was China where the central bank increased its required reserve ratio for commercial banks by 1 percentage point to 7 per cent, in an effort to curb rapid growth in credit.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
The Democratic governor is pushing a five - point ethics plan that would require corrupt lawmakers to forfeit their public pensions, force lawyer - legislators to name their outside clients and require more documentation for per diem reimbursements.
In fact, research points to us requiring up to 500 mg per day of CoQ10.
Me: At this point (age 64), it's not likely that you are capable of putting on the amount of muscle needed to get back to having arms that size again (it would require about a 15 - 20 pound weight gain per inch, which makes it nearly impossible for most guys of any age to reach arms that size).
Per the earlier point, to be successful with each student is going to require creativity in putting together the right mix.
States may report certain information required on online school report cards at a later point in time than other metrics, such as per - pupil expenditure data (which lag due to the fiscal calendar).
During state fiscal years 2001 - 02 through 2010 - 11, statewide base per pupil funding under the Public School Finance Act (PSFA) and state funding for categorical programs are required to «grow annually at least by the rate of inflation plus an additional one percentage point;» and after 2010 - 11, by a rate at least equal to the rate of inflation.
However, Darling - Hammond points out that while an effective preparation program requires significant resources, «on a per - student basis, it represents a modest investment in a substantially more successful start for the principal, teachers and students in the school.»
They point out that EU standards require lower outputs of pollutants, including carbon dioxide, on a grams - per - kilometer basis.
Since 2008 doing approx 1000 miles per year, I put it through an mot on the 10th January, it passed without advisories;; The underneath is very solid indeed and doesn't need any work, the current paint was done approx 7 years ago to a good standard but is not perfect, when it had a change from Albert Blue (traces of it around the battery boxes) to the current black;; It still has the US import sticker on the left side door post, the original chassis plate and the chassis stamp on the bulkhead are all there;; It drives very well, I've driven it for circa 40 miles with no problems;; It has 15» Fuchs alloys and the spare is a chrome steel wheel;; The rear end has been «modernised» at some point, I personally would remove the rear Porsche reflector and fit an original panel and bumper stops to get it back to the original pre impact bumper look, I could do this for you if required, cost circa GBP 800;; The seats have been changed to 80's leather recaros and the door cards to a later style, again I'd put some period seats in and back date the door cards if required at cost price;; The 80's recaros are worth good money so shouldn't be too much further expense if they were sold separately;; Further information to come but please contact me if you have any queries;; In summary, a really good looking classic 911Targa, that is great value and can be enjoyed as is, or improved for not a lot of money;;
Most of the properties require 15,000 or 20,000 points per night, making this bonus the equivalent of three or four nights.
Many gift cards, such as the $ 25 Chili's gift card that requires 3,500 points to redeem, carry a less than 1 - point - per - cent value, which is the absolute minimum you should always aim for when redeeming any points or miles.
Your stratagem of not charging anything on the card at all is a good idea, but even here, note that if the minimum payment required is, say, 10 % of the outstanding balance and that is exactly what you pay each month, you will still owe $ 296.55 at the end of 12 months, from which point on you will be charged 1.25 % per month, same as for purchases.
For example, a $ 500 fare would require only $ 400, which bumps the value per point to 1.25 cents - 25 % bump in value.
Normally qualifying for Gold Elite status requires staying 10 nights per year at IHG hotels or earning 10,000 Elite qualifying points per year.
An example might be 10 or more debit transactions required per month, a maximum account balance of $ 15,000 (to receive the high interest rate, after which point it reverts to a lower rate), and the agreement to have at least one direct deposit.
Every dollar of airfare requires about 78 points, which works out to a value of about 1.3 cents per point.
There might be one account once a week or once per month that I have to «reconnect» or «revalidate» (the account has a red exclamation point next to it if it requires revalidation) but normally clicking refresh will do the trick.
It earns more points per dollar spent than other cards, has a broad choice of redemption options, charges no annual fee and doesn't require big spending.
While the amount of Points required to redeem Standard Room Rewards varies by hotel, room, booking and stay date, the number of Points required for a reward stay starts as low as 5,000 Points per night.
With the sale, a $ 50 gift card requires 3,750 points, rather than the usual 5,000 — that means you'll be redeeming Amex points at 1.33 cents each, rather than the 1 - cent - per - point value you'd usually get.
So mid-level rooms usually require 20,000 - 60,000 points per night.
In addition, you earn 3 - 7 points per dollar spent and a welcome bonus if you spend the required amount in the allotted time after applying.
Under the new rules, financial institutions will now require both insured and uninsured borrowers to undergo the stress test and qualify at the greater of two options: either the five - year benchmark rate published by the Bank of Canada (currently 4.89 per cent), or the contractual mortgage rate plus two percentage points.
The new rules introduced by the Office of Superintendent of Financial Institutions require homebuyers to prove that they can pay their uninsured mortgage at the negotiated rate plus two percentage points or at the five - year benchmark rate published by the Bank of Canada — currently 5.14 per cent.
Hotels you can book for 5,000 points per night or less — Some hotels require 100,000 points per night, but armed with a little know - how, you can get some great deals for much less.
When I compared the price of the packages to the number of points required, I found that it returned about 1.8 cents per point, which is well above average.
Puppies will require about 170 calories per day to stay fueled and energized at this point, though this could also vary by puppy, energy level, and actual body weight.
They will require up to 10 feedings per day for a further two or three weeks, at which point they should be transitioned to more solid foods and less meals.
/ ~ pion dog or bitch in the United States, The only restriction on contestants for ~ the title being that they must have previously placed first, second, third or fourth during the calendar year, in a Trial for the breed in this country where championship points are awarded, It is the purpose of this Trial to determine the best Springer of the year under the usual and customary trial procedures» but «covering more trial days and more series per dog, in order that consist ant, outstanding, dog work over the entire trial may be demonstrated and the element of luck eliminated as nearly as possible in the final judging of all contestants, Thus no trick or unusual tests WIll be allowed and the dogs will be tested in a manner approximating a rough days, shoot adjoining water as closely as is possible with planted game, There will be a minimum of five land series and two water series and the winning and placing dogs will be required to complete all series to receive an award, The trophy for the best amateur handler in the trials will be awarded only in the event that the recipient is able = to complete all series required of the winning and placing dogs.
There's one more tier, Platinum elite status, which requires 75 nights but earns you 50 % additional points per stay.
Indeed, it would make things easier: hotel rooms can be split, requiring half the award night and points - earning effort per person with two to a room.
IHG award nights typically require between 10,000 and 50,000 points per night, depending on which of 9 categories a location is in.
Rooms awarded through their PointsBreaks ® program cost just 5,00 points per night, and many perfectly reasonable Holiday Inn properties require just 10,000 or 15,000 points per night.
The only Marriott property in San Salvador is the Courtyard San Salvador, requiring a ridiculous 70,000 points per night for a room that retails at $ 149.
While rooms downtown were almost impossible to come by and extraordinarily expensive, the Hyatt Regency Bethesda was a bargain, at less than $ 90 per night over the weekend for a cash stay requiring no points.
Even though this transfer requires 2 Membership Rewards points for 1 Elevate point, an extremely low rate of 6,233 Elevate points per seat made this a fair enough proposition, especially given how much better the Virgin flying experience typically is compared to our alternative option of US Air.
If you redeem at the lower end of the award bands, the points required and consequent required value per night will be lower.
At 1,200 points per credit, the conversion process described above results in a much better value, requiring only 19,200 points for the same roundtrip!
Finally, it's difficult to justify the 40,000 + points per night required to stay at most Ritz - Carlton properties, but if you're even thinking about using your points at the Ritz, your level of spending may be high enough for redemptions at that level to not scare you off.
These look mainly like negative changes, with most oh hotels now requiring more points per night.
Hotels you can book for 5,000 points per night or less — Some hotels require 100,000 points per night, but armed with a little know - how, you can get some great deals for much less.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z