Sentences with phrase «points spent there»

You'll get a higher rewards rate by redeeming your points for travel through Chase's Ultimate Rewards website, which offers a 25 percent discount on points spent there.

Not exact matches

«But I think there's a certain point in your business where you have to spend the money so it can free you up to make more money.»

Fortunately, thanks to the fact that there are tons of opportunities to earn points and miles with credit card sign - up bonuses, spending, and other methods, I'm already looking forward to my next first class and business class flights!

«If there's going to be at any point the smallest temptation [to resume spending], you cut up the card,» he said.

And despite so - called stimulus spending totalling nearly three - quarters of a trillion dollars, he points out that there is still very little momentum in the world's largest economy.

While there are many credit cards that offer rewards, Chase Sapphire Preferred is often recommended for high points - to - spend ratio.

«There was a point, he told me, where after spending nearly $ 200,000, he felt like, «I am completely illiterate in something that I have so many ideas in, in an area that is the future, and in an area where if I want to continue building things then I need to be able to speak the language,»» Poonawala said.

Cities also need to continue upgrading their transit systems, so while there may be spending pauses during tough economic times, that money has to be spent at some point.

If a company boss can't play with a government official, there's little point in him spending his money,» said the owner of a golf equipment store in Shanghai who only gave his surname as Huang.

Instead of fighting your way upstream amongst all the other fish in the river, find the sales points that are sizable but more approachable and spend your time there.

Travel is expensive, after all (and, if you have kids, not exactly stress free), so there's no point prolonging a trip if the extra time and money spent isn't going to add to your happiness or relaxation levels.

There is no point spending hours creating a lead magnet if your content itself isn't worth reading and no one bothers staying on the page all the way to the end.

That being said, however, there's no point in spending money every month on small business banking services you're not using or conversely, paying relatively high small business bank account fees and not getting the small business banking services you need.

There is some confusion, however, on this point and so it is worth spending some time to clarify it.

At this point, you should be able to have a general sense of whether there is enough reason to spend time and energy on a particular campaign.

To top it all off, there's also a 50,000 - point bonus that you unlock if you spend at least $ 4,000 on the card within the first three months of receiving it.

(There is not universal agreement on this last point: Andrew Coyne, for one, prefers real per capita spending.)

Between the high rewards rate on general spending, and the ability to transfer rewards points to airline miles, there is a lot of good value here.

Investors spend hours researching funds for expense ratios and spreads, trying to save a few basis points here and there.

While products sell at every price point, and there are successful sellers at all ends of this spectrum, it's still worth considering the time you might need to spend supporting your sales or managing your order volume to make sure that your products are a match for your ability to add value and your available time.

Finally, there's a 50,000 - point bonus available if you spend $ 5,000 on the card within the first three months of card membership.

On this point there are parallels to America's exorbitant spending on national security since the inception of George W. Bush's «global war on terrorism» in 2001.1

Point is, there are a lot people that can't afford health insurance and there is a lot of wasteful spending and massive profit margins on the corporate side.

Case in point: I'm obsessed with coffee, coconut and anything spicy, and consider a weekend well - spent if there's lots of good food and drink to go around.

However, if I'm wrong and this lack of spending is imposed on Wenger by kronke or any other top management, then there is no point in changing Wenger.

Saying that there is a lack of transfer activity furthers my point as we have spent 110 million net last season as well as signing 2 defenders and promoting 1.

We are now apparently in a far better financial position, and the purchases of Ozil and Sanchez would certainly point towards this being the truth, we now regularly hear about what cash reserves the club has and there are war chest quotes of 70 million to 120 million in each transfer window and club execs and the like as well as the press tell us how much money we can spend....

There have been various theories and the most common has been the financial aspect of the modern game, with Wenger having his spending restricted at the same time as Chelsea and Man City were pushing the boundaries of spending to breaking point.

Of course at the same time unless the club are willing to spend big on players who can win the big prizes then there is no point in being in the competition in the first place.

more to the point for an Economics graduate, who doesn't understand inflation moaning about the fact the the price of players has gone up considering annual revenues of the premier league teams have shot up too is incredibly stupid... But hey Wenger knows best; he wouldn't be in a position not having to spend over the odds for quality players if he acted in the first place, that's the icing on the retard cake there for me..

hope the falcao deal is on permanent basis not loan no point in spending 20m on loan when we can get jacskon Martinez / bony for that money wenger left it late still there is hope

There's no point spending # 200m on players if they play in a system that can not defend.

There's no point in spending that money if Wenger is still in charge.

Debuchy pointed out again how not to spend 10 million on a right back and it's depressing how we need Bellerin and Coquelin to fill two positions when we have zero options there, when instead any decent top club would look at adequate replacements.

Well to a point they are right, maybe we are luckier than your average PL club, but then we are NOT your average PL club, we are charged the highest ticket prices of any club in the EPL for starter's and we are now apparently debt free and according to certain sources inside the clubs Hierarchy can buy any player we want, in short we are financially as big as any of our competition with regards to the ability to buy in top quality talent, and while we don't have the money to burn that Man city or Chelsea have we are in a position to spend more and spend it more often as long as there is a degree of prudence.

There will be many cynical fans saying that Gazidis says this every year, but it rarely comes true and, as Ivan pointed out, we spent # 110million in last summer's transfer window.

just reading around and all if not most rags are saying our net spend is # 46 million how can they tell that when they do nt even know what our real budget is if it was # 100 million then we are in profit by quite a bit i do nt really know what they base there assumptions on this is where you could do with swiss ramble to dissect what really was spent from what i could see most of our 5 transfers were covered by out goings and c / l monies earned debuchy - vela deal, chambers - vermalen deal, ospina - cesc and miquel deals sanchez c / l monies and other monies recovered from wages and old installment based deals this is the same with welbeck i would imagine if not then poldolski will be sold in jan to cover this as i think he was going to be sold and this would have covered welbecks transfer more or less also and people do nt always realize that arsenal have money coming in from more than one source to cover transfers not just puma and emirates deals we have property arm of the club which makes money for transfers also outstanding debts we are owed of old transfers we receive each year on song cesc maybe van persie and all other structured deals in installment payments sales we just flogged miquel as an example and all the monies from released wages and youths sold its a bit to complex to just say we have a net spend of xyz when arsenal do nt even make the budget public so they have no starting point from which to go from i bet you we have broke even or even made a slight profit as we are self sustaining it would make sense that we can break even or at least make the net spend under # 10 million each year at least screw then all we are the arsenal we do thing our way

As reported by The Telegraph, however, the Arsenal boss played down this pressure and declared one again that he would not be forced into spending big money on a player just for the sake of it, going on to suggest that unless the player in question was better than the likes of Theo Walcott, Joel Campbell and Alex Iwobi then there was not much point in Arsenal signing them.

Surely common sense would suggest if Man City finish 4 points ahead of us then spend over 60 million on outfield talent compared to our zero, there is a high chance that that gap widens.

There is no point spending 35 million and not playing him at this stage of the season.

It's got so sad I'm thinking Jonny Evans be good signing because I'm thinking he's better than wat we have sad but true mustafi is a lerk one min good next min tackles fresh air, BFG is a wheelchair it's embarrassing kos is injury away from retirement oh but we have Monreal great player but not center back it's joke wenger loves football so that's why going forward we look good but defending not he's game bring back George graham just as defensive coach jez even Sam allardyce has Everton a lot tighter it's fact we can't defend for years I'm sick saying wenger is and will always be arsenal great always in my eyes but he has go for good of everyone we need young fresh manager and not someone mr wenger hand picks and he goes upstairs won't work can't work we need let new coaches do there job and let new manager do he's and please give him money spend and laugh if ye want but the man for new job has be allergi has be if can't get den Luis Enrique if not him get Henry with vieria wat a buzz it be with them 2 my point.

And anyway saying that we have only really spent # 21million is pointless, arsenal have money to spend anyway, there's no point spending money on players we don't need just because we havent spent all this so called budget that everyone seems to think they know exactly what amount we have to spend.

Sam P writing that there is a «silver lining» to the massive Liverpool defeat, since it means Wenger will now spend some money, totally misses the point.

We may have spent a similar amount over the last 2 seasons on the surface, a point I myself have made, but there is 2 other factors to bare in mind.

The Longhorns have given up more points in a game and a half than Maryland will score all year, players are going down all over the field and to add insult to injury, there are people having all kinds of fun and eating delicious carnival food just outside the stadium they're forced to spend another couple hours in.

Barcelona made the point that Arsenal had paid over the odds for a player, when there were more suitable targets available all summer, however Arsenal have that kind of money to spend and I think we have invested well in Mustafi.

Fact is we have not won the PL in 12 years Fact is we were 12 points off Chelsea last year Fact is we were 4 points off City last year Fact is both teams spent serious money and strengthened their squad Fact is we only strengthened in one position a position where we were not too weak tbh Fact is in the PL there are 4 - 5 top teams unlike other top leagues Fact is we are already 5 points off City Fact is you snooze you loose

We can watch TTU put up a bunch of points and fall short without spending our Chip there.

The thing that really bothers me is the thing we've disagreed on in the past and that's imo Wengers apparent lack of Urgency and decisiveness when moving into the transfer window I know that Scheweinsteiger would be a great addition but He is somewhat over the hill in comparison to the others that are being toted about and while I know that we are not the cash Rich Man Poo or Man Sh!tty or Chelski I do know that we are at a point for the first time in ten years where we don't need to replace many players or are being frced to sell the quality ones we have, we are for the first time in a spot where we only need to add two or three players and we are there in terms of being able to compete, Id hate for the financial Exuberance to stop us taking that final stride forward into the competitive team we nearly are IMO spend the money now, get the striker, get the DM and we wont need to look at transfers in a big way again for several seasons and with that in mind Id rather have the likes of Benzema or Lacazetta or even Cavanni than a nearly over the hill Scheweinsteiger.

Now I doubt your coach spent a lot of time studying the tea ceremony, and he probably thinks wabi - sabi is something that goes on sushi, but he grasped an essential point: There's no perfect path available, so learn to love the imperfect.