Sentences with phrase «points than quality»

In other words, equity dividends are higher by a third of a percentage points than quality bond yields, and that's before the dividend tax credit and before any capital gains.

Not exact matches

In the beginning I questioned the price point of my services, but they helped me realize I was providing a fast, high - quality and trustworthy service that warranted higher fees than fly - by - knight repair companies.
And while Taco Bell loses points for quality, it more than makes up for it in the creativity of menu items and a nearly impossible - to - beat price point.
The WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index, for example, beat the S&P 500 Index by more than 550 basis points in 2017, and we continue to prefer the company and sector tilts within this Index relative to the broader market.
«Really, it comes down to quality, accurate data that covers many, many, many different locations,» he says, pointing out that they can forecast within a one - kilometre radius of a user's location, a smaller surface area — and therefore more useful — than the one - mile radius standard in the U.S..
Hudson Square Research analyst Jeffrey Logsdon points out that this year's movie crop is smaller than in the summer of 2013, but the bigger factor behind the current summer slump could be quality.
Britain's FTSE 100 index is seen opening up 20 points on Wednesday, according to financial bookmakers * STANDARD CHARTERED: Standard Chartered Plc posted a better - than - expected 20 percent rise in pretax profit for the first three months of the year, helped by a surge in loan demand and improvement in asset quality.
May 2 Britain's FTSE 100 index is seen opening up 20 points on Wednesday, according to financial bookmakers * STANDARD CHARTERED: Standard Chartered Plc posted a better - than - expected 20 percent rise in pretax profit for the first three months of the year, helped by a surge in loan demand and improvement in asset quality.
During the middle of the 18th Century and well into the beginning of the 19th Century India produced far more textiles — and usually much cheaper and of better qualitythan did England, but a number of measures aimed at undermining Indian textile producers and protecting British textile producers (tariffs that almost always exceeded 50 %, for example, and by 1813 were as high as 85 %) meant that at some point in the first half of the 19th Century the British textile industry had become the most efficient in the world and was able largely to eliminate the Indian textile industry from global competition.
The quality and appeal of your work is far more important than the length, but the data points toward longer posts as being more popular for link building and SEO — that is, at least several thousand words long.
On average, high - quality corporate bonds currently have yields that are at least one percentage point higher than Treasury bonds.
The long / short strategy generated excess returns of 45 basis points per month, 50 % higher than the 31 basis points per month generated by the unconditional quality strategy, despite running at lower volatility (10.4 % as opposed to 12.2 %).
The long / short strategy based on the joint quality and value signal generated excess returns of 61 basis points per month, twice that generated by the quality or value signals alone and a third higher than the market, despite running at a volatility of only 9.7 %.
Prices, he says are «at or better» than the typical Whole Foods stores — maybe not a salve for those who nicknamed it Whole Paycheck, but for what I saw, price points were reasonable, especially for the level of quality.
One might go further and point out that the concept of «person» helps us understand human dignity as something deriving from the fact of one's intrinsic being» rather than from the extent of freestanding autonomy, the «quality of life,» that a person might demonstrate.
We will not make this kind of move until we really decide that happiness is more important than the quantity or quality of the goods consumed, and that the latter is not, beyond a certain point, a significant contributor to happiness.
If the point of religion is to bring peace and guide a culture toward certain specific behaviors, primarily for order and the preservation of the good qualities of society, then how can one say that one religion is better than another or that a «religion-less» person who STILL acts the SAME way (i.e. does right unto their neighbors, lives according to the thing the bible suggests) but is more tolerant is not as high quality a citizen as another who is associated with a Major League Religious Team?
Pointing needs supplementing with a third relatum, some comparison or noting of resemblance, which itself introduces a third principle or quality linking more than one item.
It is built on qualities that reflect nothing less than the heart of God — loving His bride to the point of giving away His very life.
Qualities which are purported to make religions «unique» are usually talking points designed to convince the believers that their own faith is more objectively true and real, more fulfilling, than others» - this is essentially religious intolerance with a positive spin instead of a negative one.
The love of one's enemies, perhaps more than anything else, vividly demonstrates the unique quality of love to which the Christian heritage points.
I know you love your digital Rebel and macro lens and this may sound silly but do you just point and shoot or do you manually set each photograph — I've been debating getting a digital SLR but am wondering how much better it is than a good quality point - and - shoot.
These days, most beer distributors seem to care more about numbers than quality service, Nober points out.
Although Aquilina admits Victoria's products are not inexpensive, he points out that their quality is significantly higher than the competition.
The quality is far more than what you would expect at this price point, and they bake like a dream.
Known for its unrelenting commitment to quality, unique flavor profiles and a desire to bring great tasting beer to consumers across the country, Ballast Point has been dedicated to the craft of brewing for more than 20 years.
The quality of bulk wine now makes it arguably, at certain price points, a better product than one bottled at source.
The appreciation and recognition of excellence in beverage operations is upon us and the current trends of classic drinks, higher quality ingredients and attention to detail all points to a time in the past that seems immeasurably better than today.
But then again, I assume click points are more important than quality so there you have it, we need accepting primates here too.
As impressive as Leicesters PL season has been, with the quality of our squad we should have a lot more points than we managed to secure.
Better we loose 3 Points and Wenger realizes early enough that the squad is still short of the quality needed to challenge for the title than go a whole season with a squad that's neither here nor there
Budd Budd Budd, fair enough we have won two fa cups back to back, but the point is that this squad can achieve much more success than that with just two quality additions, that's the song every transfer window.
That was obviously an example to make the point that a team generally plays to its quality rather than being substantially improved by a good coach or made worse by a bad coach.
If we start this season with those two in our starting 11 it will be a clear sign from this organization that nothing has changed and that we will never get it right until both Kroenke and Wenger are gone... neither one of these players should still be with our club at this point because they represent the settling half - measures that have plagued this team for a number of years... this is what I call the «no man's land» of the soccer world, where teams don't have enough talented young players, unlike a Monaco or Dortmund, because they have lost the plot from an organizational standpoint... they are so reliant on one individual to run the whole operation that their once relevant scouting department has become so antiquated that it can no longer find those hidden gems it once had... furthermore, when you leave all decision - making to a manager who despises any dissenting opinions, your management team becomes little more than a stagnant group of «yes men» and no new ideas emerge... so instead of developing a team with the qualities necessary to excel in a particular system, you continually make half - brain purchases year after year to stifle dissent from the ticket - buying public, then try desperately to finagle together a lineup regardless of what would make positional sense... have you ever heard of a team who plays players out of position so often... of course not because that manager would likely be fired and never work for a team of any consequence ever again
Things like overall record (without looking into if there is mitigating circumstances), Total defense (trash stat that doesn't take into account quality of offenses played), Total offense (same as total defense), scoring average (much less telling than points per possession), etc..
So next week we could have Bellerin, Gibbs and Coquelin back and the week after that could see the return of Mertesacker, Debuchy and Walcott but for this weekend the Gunners need to take all three points off Swansea in Wales and even with our injury problems there is more than enough quality in the side to do that, isn't there?
You get points for having the quality to score more goals than the other team.
This is what I've been saying for weeks that I just don't see the point in Monreal or Kolasinac at CB.If LB's are being played at CB it tells me more of the quality of the other players than the quality of the LB's.
4th place gone, football quality at an all time low, a half empty stadium... the furure ai nt what it used to be... junkies in cold turkey... wenger pretending that more points than last season means progress... the man is a charlatan of the first order.
we cant make a whole season without 1 or 2 crucial injuries at some point so adding better quality than we ha is a must for us to challenge for a major title
Well to a point they are right, maybe we are luckier than your average PL club, but then we are NOT your average PL club, we are charged the highest ticket prices of any club in the EPL for starter's and we are now apparently debt free and according to certain sources inside the clubs Hierarchy can buy any player we want, in short we are financially as big as any of our competition with regards to the ability to buy in top quality talent, and while we don't have the money to burn that Man city or Chelsea have we are in a position to spend more and spend it more often as long as there is a degree of prudence.
Until silly free kick holding much better than chambers but inexperience will eventually show... Ramsey did nothing and with coq and elneny the midfield is solid but lacks quality... Is Wenger just playing for a point?
who knows whether a disgruntled Sanchez plus an untested lacazette will produce a better attack than last year and while I have hopes for kolasinac its already clear there will be teething issues with him... but the point is we are not fighting last year's battles we are in this year's EPL against teams that have strengthened over the summer and it was wingers job to bring real quality to two key areas where we have clearly fallen behind in midfield and central defence..
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
Don't frankly know enough about Van Dijk as a person other than seeing him on the field to draw a fair conclusion on that point, but yeah if that is not a valid concern then he is definitely quality!
I think you and others would be more on point if you also listed out the players that left those clubs rather than suggesting they are simply layering on yet more quality.
I personally don't think Debuchy is equivalent to Sagna and Chambers is definitely not better than Verminator... point is our defense dropped their standard in terms of the quality they had from the previous season.
I gave a reasoning, not the most in - depth as it would turn into pages of text lol How - ever I have pointed at past GREAT cptns and the qualities they had, they would not accept anything less than 110 % from their players and they motivated the team...
Tottenham are at a point now where they are arguably in need of adding real star quality to their squad rather than just filling the gaps, and so these two individuals may well be questionable signings.
Anything less than all three points at home to West Brom on Monday evening will leave us way behind the pace setters and that will bring more frustration and dissent from the Arsenal fans, more questions about Arsene Wenger and his ability to take the team forwards and more doubts about the quality of our players.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z