Sentences with phrase «points you receive per»

The number of points you receive per dollar depends on the store.

If I had realized this I would have split my 61,000 point transfer up as 37,000 points and 24,000 points to stay under the limit of 50,000 Amtrak points received per transaction.

Points you receive per the SDIP will not be applied towards a driver's license suspension.

Not exact matches

She was paid $ 10 per hour and given just enough work to get her up to the point (but not over) where she still remained ineligible to receive health benefits.

(If you decline to receive email notifications you only earn 1 point per $ 2.)

You can choose to redeem your points for travel through the Ultimate Rewards ® portal and receive a value of 1.25 cents per point.

At this point, you can exercise your option and receive 100 shares of the company for a steep discount; you would pay only $ 150 per share.

Receive 3 points per dollar spent on travel and dining and 1 point per dollar spent on all other purchases.

In addition, Prestige cardholders receive an exceptional 1.33 cents per point for airfare reservations and 1.6 cents per point if the airline is American or US Airways.

But, what this means is these metrics were enough to get this page to this point... ranking in the top 5 for a head keyword that receives 450,000 searches per month.

Cardholders also receive a competitive rewards program that features 1.5 points per dollar spent on purchases, and each point is worth one cent statement credit towards travel purchases.

Once enrolled, members receive 10 points per dollar spent on all purchases *, and can enjoy a free entrée for every 2,000 points earned.

The maximum points a team can receive per ballot in the BlogPoll is 25.00.

Alabama stays No. 1 comfortably, receiving 64 of 87 first - place votes and outpacing No. 2 Oregon (four first - place votes) by more than a point per ballot, 24.37 to 23.20.

Seth received little playing time in the preseason, and for a scoring guard his 2.6 points per game did not satisfy Golden State.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Ole Miss closed with just 25 % of spread tickets, pushing coach Hugh Freeze's career ATS record to 8 - 0 when receiving less than 30 % of spread tickets, covering by an average of 9.88 points per game.

-- Historically, teams receiving less than 40 % of bets have gone 8 - 2 ATS in the Elite 8, covering by an average of 5.75 points per game.

A trio of freshmen led the way to the No. 1 seed as Rick Barros III (17.2 points and 8.4 rebounds per game) received plenty of support from the backcourt pairing of B.J. Askew (15.9 ppg) and Jayce McCain (15.1 ppg).

Drivers can receive a $ 50 fine and a point against their license per improperly restrained child.

Special offers include: ability to use other discount codes on top of sale price — use Sparkle Bucks points or sign up to receive a code for an additional 10 per cent discount.

Military discount plus FREE shipping over $ 35 Flip diaper covers starting at $ 9.99 GroVia swim diapers starting at $ 10.50 MILK MADNESS MONDAY: Each Monday you can type MILKMADNESS in your order notes and all orders that end in an EVEN order # will receive an extra point per dollar spent — that means DOUBLE points for Coach, TRIPLE points for First Class, and QUAD points for the MHC.

With just seven per cent of gifted and talent pupils receiving free school meals, the Liberal Democrats point out children from low income families are half as likely to be identified as gifted.

For most of this year, Labour have hovered a few points above the Conservatives, who seem to float around the 37 per cent vote share they received at the general election.

You point out that Paterson took a voluntary 10 % pay cut for 2009, but neglect to mention that his wife received a $ 40,000 per year raise in 2009.

Cuomo's man visits Stony Point, promises up to $ 300,000 per home, but says those who already agreed to SBA loans are stuck with that aid Congresswoman Nita Lowey (D - Westchester / Rockland) this week announced that local governments in Westchester and Rockland Counties have so far received $ 35,338,879 in Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Public Assistance grants to -LSB-...]

According to reports prepared by the Council of Ontario Universities (COU), although the level of provincial government funding to universities in all 10 provinces has steadily declined since 1988, it has declined fastest in Ontario, to the point at which Ontario's universities receive 22 % less per student than universities in the other nine provinces.

During triple points, you earn 6 points per dollar instead of 2, which means for every $ 334 spent, you will receive $ 20 to spend at Nordstrom!

For example, a Metal Slime is totally immune to magic, and only receive 1 or 2 damage points per attack.

Metal monsters typically only receive one point of damage per landed attack, and they are very hard to hit.

After controlling for average class size, per - pupil spending in 1998 - 99, the percentage of students with disabilities, the percentage of students receiving a free or reduced - price school lunch, the percentage of students with limited English proficiency, and student mobility rates, high - scoring F schools achieved gains that were 2.5 points greater than their below - average D counterparts in reading (see Figure 2).

26 per cent of all pupils were found to have received tutoring at some point in their schooling, with this rising as high as 42 per cent in London.

To ascertain which states were receiving the most from their incremental dollars, we ranked states on a «points per added dollar» basis.

Those from high affluence households (35 per cent) are twice as likely as those from low affluence households (18 per cent) to have received such tuition at some point.

The polling by Ipsos MORI of 2,612 11 -16-year-olds in England and Wales finds that 30 per cent of them have received private tuition at some point, up from 25 per cent in 2016 and 18 per cent in 2005.

But Chingos points out that K12 schools receive an average of $ 7,393 in public revenue per student, 37 percent less than the district school average of $ 11,708.

Results for other Facilitating Subjects also remain relatively unchanged, with the majority increasing at A * but declining marginally at A * - A. For example, in Biology the percentage of awards receiving an A * increased 1.4 percentage points to 9.4 per cent, but at A * - A declined 0.8 percentage points to 27.5 per cent.

Examining data on more than 15,000 children born between 1955 and 1985, it found that poor children whose schools were estimated to receive and maintain a 10 percent increase in per - pupil spending (adjusted for inflation) before they began their 12 years of public school were 10 percentage points more likely to complete high school than other poor children.

We're fast approaching the point where those schools and other charters across the state won't be to afford these necessities, because the $ 11,000 they receive per - child is simply not enough to cover rising structural costs.

But the «we need to spend more» mantra has been blown up countless times, most recently by Minnesota reformer / writer Chris Stewart who pointed out that North High, one of the poorest performing schools in Minneapolis, receives budget allocations that amount to $ 17,460 per student, while Southwest High, a school ranked among the best in the nation, gets just $ 7,782 per student.

Specifically, we find that a 1 percentage point increase in the share of income received by the middle class is associated with an increase of $ 64 per - pupil spending on public school kindergarten - through - 12th - grade education.

And they are paid $ 2,000 to $ 3,000 per day to help a company meet its communications objectives by sharing key message points through media interviews, while receiving impressive free media exposure for their books.

But when points and miles are redeemed strategically for high value award flights and luxury hotel stays, then it is often possible to receive three to five cents in value per point, which is much better than the best cash back reward cards.

Hilton points are usually valued lower than others on the list and, to compensate for this, you will receive 1.5 HHonors points per ThankYou point.

A whopping seven points per dollar are received for purchases made at a Hilton or affiliate location.

Firstly, whenever booking hotels and flights through Amextravel.com, cardholders can receive 2 points per $ 1 (recall that this is also how consumers can take advantage of the hotel credit).

Receive 3 points per dollar spent on travel and dining and 1 point per dollar spent on all other purchases.

For example, the employer might determine that you will receive $ 45,000 per year of retirement income until you turn 90 years old at which point pension benefits will cease.

Purchases made with JetBlue Airways directly receive six points per dollar spent.

The fewer points required per dollar, the more value you are receiving for those points.