Not exact matches
«We are not recommending placing rhino herds in Arizona or
polar bears in Antarctica,» the group writes,
as, for example, the
polar bear would then devastate Antarctic penguin and seal
populations that have never encountered such a predator.
They concluded that, based on a median value across all scenarios, there's a high probability of a 30 percent decline in the global
population of
polar bears over the next three to four decades, which supports listing the species
as vulnerable on the IUCN Red List.
The earlier study also compared shark
population numbers with other apex predators, such
as polar bears and killer whales.
Some changes are well - known, such
as declines in
polar bear populations and stresses to walruses being forced out of their shallow feeding grounds
as ice retreats into deeper waters.
As sea ice disappears,
polar bear populations will crash harder than the seabirds.
Lindqvist says that the analysis reveals that
polar bear DNA has lost diversity
as populations have dwindled, drifted apart and become genetically isolated, suggesting today's
bears have less resilience to the environmental change, habitat loss, pollution and diseases they now face.
The
population looks set to fall again
as melting pack ice forces
polar bears back to the land - based habitats of brown
bears, where interbreeding has recently been observed.
A comprehensive review (pdf) by the US Fish and Wildlife Service concluded that shrinking sea ice is the primary cause for the decline seen in these
populations, and it recently proposed listing
polar bears as threatened (pdf) under the Endangered Species Act.
The likelihood of serious sea level rise under «business
as usual», and impacts on water resources may not have the acute drama associated with
polar bear population decline or the possibility of massive methane clathrate releases, but they are much more likely to figure on policy makers agendas — just
as other long term chronic issues (such
as pensions) do.
So how to explain the increase in the
polar bear population from 5,000 in 1950 to 25,000 today,
as documented by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service?
I do not want to draw any conclusions
as to the threat to the
polar bear populations posed by the ongoing environmental changes / future warming of the Arctic.
RE - Sanjong Thanpa: «So how to explain the increase in the
polar bear population from 5,000 in 1950 to 25,000 today,
as documented by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service?»
how to explain the increase in the
polar bear population from 5,000 in 1950 to 25,000 today,
as documented by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service?
On a related front, a new paper in the journal Nature Communications (available in full online) projects deep reductions in litter size in the
polar bear population along the western shores of Hudson Bay, should the open - water season continue to lengthen
as foreseen under the warming influence of accumulating greenhouse gases.
It is a very complex issue with no clear cut answers however
as it is critical for
polar bears to have both ice and water any reduction of sea ice is going to reduce the
population over the next few decades.
WASHINGTON, Dec. 27 — The Interior Department proposed Wednesday to designate
polar bears as a threatened species, saying that the accelerating loss of the Arctic ice that is the
bears» hunting platform has led biologists to believe that
bear populations will decline, perhaps sharply, in the coming decades.
The New York Times has come up with a new defense against so - called climate denialists who happen to point out that most
polar bear populations are steady or increasing amidst climate change: The ice hasn't disappeared
as fast
as we said it would.
As a physical scientist rather than a biologist, I am generally reluctant to get involved in such topics as the influence of climate on polar - bear population, health and biolog
As a physical scientist rather than a biologist, I am generally reluctant to get involved in such topics
as the influence of climate on polar - bear population, health and biolog
as the influence of climate on
polar -
bear population, health and biology.
The recent listing of
polar bears as «endangered» was based on junk science and GIGO computer models that claim manmade global warming will send the
bears» record
population numbers into oblivion.
Overall, and based on actual
population studies, there is good evidence that
polar bear numbers have increased,
as Lawson said.
In news that may be shocking to ClimateDepot,
polar bear population is affected by non-climatological factors such
as regulations on
polar bear hunting, just like India's
population is affected non-AIDS factors such
as vaccination programs.
This too is understandable
as Derocher was invested in his earlier predictions that «by the middle of this century, two - thirds of the
polar bears will be gone from their current
populations»
As they live further south than any other
population of
polar bears, the group is particularly vulnerable to the effects of climate change.
While the dramatic loss of weight has not led to a decline in the
population of
polar bears, that could change
as a warming Arctic continues to melt away sea ice.
The presence of this warm water in the North Atlantic helps explain why Scotland has a relatively mild climate when compared to places at similar latitudes in North America such
as Churchill, Manitoba — a Canadian town famous for its seasonal
polar bear population.
Besides shrinking sea ice there are currently also other factors that negatively affect
polar bears, such
as human settlements, industrial activities, hunting, bio-accumulation of toxins, and smaller seal
populations.
Secretary Salazar has so far defended the Bush - era «threatened» designation, claiming that threats to the species are only of concern in the future — notwithstanding the fact that
polar bears are already drowning and starving
as a result of sea - ice loss, with many
populations declining.
As late April is the peak of this critical spring feeding period for most
polar bear populations, this is when sea ice conditions are also critical.
This genome would not only provide excellent markers to study extant
polar bear populations but could also provide clues
as to how
polar bears rapidly evolved and subsequently survived through the last interglacial period.
They provided alternate explanations for the decline of
polar bear populations, such
as stress from interactions with tourists, and suggested the
bears could adapt to a warming climate by supplementing their diet with berries and vegetation.
Biologists have predicted for decades that
as the ice disappears,
polar bear populations will decline because they rely on the ice
as a hunting platform.
As regards to the
polar bear population, it seems to be stable at present.
Wilder presents these numbers
as a basis for saying how concerned he is that a longer open - water season in the Arctic could increase the number of attacks by
polar bears — and he's right, that's a valid concern now that the global
population of
bears is so high.