Naturally many factors influence
polar sea ice extent, such as weather patterns, winds, -LSB-...]
Recent trends in the decline of Arctic
polar sea ice extent continued in 2016.
Naturally many factors influence
polar sea ice extent, such as weather patterns, winds,
Not exact matches
They then used the satellite record of Arctic
sea ice extent to calculate the rates of
sea ice loss and then projected those rates into the future, to estimate how much more the
sea ice cover may shrink in approximately three
polar bear generations, or 35 years.
This year,
sea ice in the Arctic reached its smallest maximum extent since satellites began tracking polar ice patterns, according to the National Snow and Ice Data Center, while scientists have also forecast ice - free Arctic summers in two to three decades (ClimateWire, July 16, 201
ice in the Arctic reached its smallest maximum
extent since satellites began tracking
polar ice patterns, according to the National Snow and Ice Data Center, while scientists have also forecast ice - free Arctic summers in two to three decades (ClimateWire, July 16, 201
ice patterns, according to the National Snow and
Ice Data Center, while scientists have also forecast ice - free Arctic summers in two to three decades (ClimateWire, July 16, 201
Ice Data Center, while scientists have also forecast
ice - free Arctic summers in two to three decades (ClimateWire, July 16, 201
ice - free Arctic summers in two to three decades (ClimateWire, July 16, 2013).
But over the past decades, the melt season has grown longer and the average
extent of Arctic
sea ice has diminished, changing the game for many Arctic marine mammals — namely beluga, narwhal and bowhead whales; ringed, bearded, spotted, ribbon, harp and hooded seals; walruses; and
polar bears.
Climate change is pushing temperatures up most rapidly in the
polar regions and left the
extent of Arctic
sea ice at 1.79 million square miles at the end of the summer melt season.
The established icons of Arctic climate change are the
polar bear and, to a lesser
extent, those indigenous communities that are trying to maintain traditional ways in the face of slushy floes and the relentless erosion of coasts exposed to waves as
sea ice retreats.
Extent, for once, is crucial in determining the amount of absorbed solar radiation, the area of
polar bear (and other animals») habitat, the amount of snow that falls onto
sea ice, etc..
From the Archives, Oct. 2, 2009 The established icons of Arctic climate change are the
polar bear and, to a lesser
extent, those indigenous communities that are trying to maintain traditional ways in the face of slushy floes and the relentless erosion of coasts exposed to waves as
sea ice retreats.
The corresponding future temperatures in Greenland are comparable to those inferred for the last interglacial period 125,000 years ago, when paleoclimatic information suggests reductions of
polar land
ice extent and 4 to 6 m of
sea level rise.
Comments Off on Histrionics over Arctic temperatures &
sea ice extent: implications for
polar bears
Keywords: Arctic
sea ice, Antarctic
sea ice, passive microwave imaging, global warming, climate change,
polar ice caps,
sea ice extent,
sea ice dispersion, trends, uncertainty in trends, statistical inference
Tagged 30 year baseline, Beaufort
Sea, Chukchi Sea, climatology, Cryosphere Today, NSIDC, polar bear status, sea ice extent, summer sea
Sea, Chukchi
Sea, climatology, Cryosphere Today, NSIDC, polar bear status, sea ice extent, summer sea
Sea, climatology, Cryosphere Today, NSIDC,
polar bear status,
sea ice extent, summer sea
sea ice extent, summer
sea sea ice
Tagged annual summer minimum, arctic
sea ice, Beaufort Sea, body condition, Cherry, Chukchi, declining sea ice, Eastern Beaufort, good news, heavy sea ice, Hudson Bay, ice - free Arctic, litter size, loss of summer ice, Pilfold, polar bear, record low, Regehr, ringed seals, Rode, sea ice extent, Southern Beaufort, Stirling, summer ice minimum, summer sea ice, thick spring
sea ice, Beaufort
Sea, body condition, Cherry, Chukchi, declining sea ice, Eastern Beaufort, good news, heavy sea ice, Hudson Bay, ice - free Arctic, litter size, loss of summer ice, Pilfold, polar bear, record low, Regehr, ringed seals, Rode, sea ice extent, Southern Beaufort, Stirling, summer ice minimum, summer sea ice, thick spring
Sea, body condition, Cherry, Chukchi, declining
sea ice, Eastern Beaufort, good news, heavy sea ice, Hudson Bay, ice - free Arctic, litter size, loss of summer ice, Pilfold, polar bear, record low, Regehr, ringed seals, Rode, sea ice extent, Southern Beaufort, Stirling, summer ice minimum, summer sea ice, thick spring
sea ice, Eastern Beaufort, good news, heavy
sea ice, Hudson Bay, ice - free Arctic, litter size, loss of summer ice, Pilfold, polar bear, record low, Regehr, ringed seals, Rode, sea ice extent, Southern Beaufort, Stirling, summer ice minimum, summer sea ice, thick spring
sea ice, Hudson Bay,
ice - free Arctic, litter size, loss of summer
ice, Pilfold,
polar bear, record low, Regehr, ringed seals, Rode,
sea ice extent, Southern Beaufort, Stirling, summer ice minimum, summer sea ice, thick spring
sea ice extent, Southern Beaufort, Stirling, summer
ice minimum, summer
sea ice, thick spring
sea ice, thick spring
ice
Tagged Arctic basin, Bering
Sea, Cape Morris Jesup, extent, facts, Greenland, polar bear, press conference, sea ice, spike, State of the Polar Bear, Svalbard, temperature, Toro
Sea, Cape Morris Jesup,
extent, facts, Greenland,
polar bear, press conference,
sea ice, spike, State of the Polar Bear, Svalbard, temperature, Toro
sea ice, spike, State of the
Polar Bear, Svalbard, temperature, Toronto
They used all the scientific papers they could find that investigated both
polar bears and
sea ice, which added up to 92, and scored their positions on
sea ice extent and whether it is decreasing significantly and the threat of extinction versus adaptability of
polar bears.
A map of
sea ice extent at the climax of the Last Glacial Maximum (both perennial and seasonal
ice), prepared with the help of a colleague, makes it possible to discuss what genetic and fossil evidence can tell us about the probable effects of glacial conditions on
polar bears and ringed seals.
At this time of year,
sea ice extent numbers are meaningless for
polar bears.
Thus, the concept of increasing CO2 is causing increasing
sea level rise from
polar ice melt embodies two assumptions that need to be established with physical evidence: 1) the
extent to which increased CO2 will cause increased temperatures, assumptions or models do not suffice; and 2) the
extent to which increased temperatures will cause Antarctic
ice melt.
So an increased GHG effect should manifest in the
polar regions in a decrease in winter
sea ice extent and a smaller increase in summer
sea ice extent relative to the winter maximum
extent (ie a smaller annual range in
sea ice extent).
Researchers at CIRES» National Snow and
Ice Data Center [About NSIDC] investigate the dynamics of Antarctic ice shelves, new techniques for the remote sensing of snow and freeze / thaw cycle of soils, the role of snow in hydrologic modeling, linkages between changes in sea ice extent and weather patterns, large - scale shifts in polar climate, river and lake ice, and the distribution and characteristics of seasonally and permanently frozen grou
Ice Data Center [About NSIDC] investigate the dynamics of Antarctic
ice shelves, new techniques for the remote sensing of snow and freeze / thaw cycle of soils, the role of snow in hydrologic modeling, linkages between changes in sea ice extent and weather patterns, large - scale shifts in polar climate, river and lake ice, and the distribution and characteristics of seasonally and permanently frozen grou
ice shelves, new techniques for the remote sensing of snow and freeze / thaw cycle of soils, the role of snow in hydrologic modeling, linkages between changes in
sea ice extent and weather patterns, large - scale shifts in polar climate, river and lake ice, and the distribution and characteristics of seasonally and permanently frozen grou
ice extent and weather patterns, large - scale shifts in
polar climate, river and lake
ice, and the distribution and characteristics of seasonally and permanently frozen grou
ice, and the distribution and characteristics of seasonally and permanently frozen ground.
Average annual
sea ice extent in both
polar regions was low in 2016.
For the year 2016,
sea ice extent in both
polar regions was at levels well below what is typical of the past several decades.
There is a widespread idea that there are actual and robust measurements of
polar bear populations, the
extent of glaciers, the rate of
sea - level rise, and the
extent of
polar sea ice.
It is true that this is consistent with the idea that there has been continuous global warming, although it is complicated by the fact that the Antarctic
sea ice extent still seems to be about the same, i.e., the «global» warming only seems to have affected the northern
polar region, not the southern
polar region.
Not only that, but if rising CO2 levels were responsible for the decline of
sea ice and implied effects on
polar bears since 1979 (when CO2 levels were around 340 ppm), why has spring
ice extent been so variable since 1989 (when the first big decline occurred) but so little changed overall since then?
Tied for fourth lowest
sea ice extent, in a three - way tie for lowest
sea ice volume, the fastest one month
sea ice loss for the date, and unusual Arctic cyclone activity affecting the decayed
ice of the
polar regions, focus just on the lake too trivializes what's happening in a region the size of the Arctic Ocean.
Schliebe, S., K. D. Rode, J. S. Gleason, J. Wilder, K. Proffitt, T. J. Evans, and S. Miller, 2008: Effects of
sea ice extent and food availability on spatial and temporal distribution of polar bears during the fall open - water period in the Southern Beaufort S
sea ice extent and food availability on spatial and temporal distribution of
polar bears during the fall open - water period in the Southern Beaufort
SeaSea.
Sea ice extent over
polar oceans is a major critical parameter for understanding and forecasting oceanic circulation and earth climate...
Climate change is pushing temperatures up most rapidly in the
polar regions and left the
extent of Arctic
sea ice at 1.79 million square miles at the end of the summer melt season.
The Multisensor Analyzed
Sea Ice Extent - Northern Hemisphere (MASIE - NH) products provide measurements of daily sea ice extent and sea ice edge boundary for the Northern Hemisphere and 16 Arctic regions in a polar stereographic projection at both 1 km and 4 km grid cell siz
Sea Ice Extent - Northern Hemisphere (MASIE - NH) products provide measurements of daily sea ice extent and sea ice edge boundary for the Northern Hemisphere and 16 Arctic regions in a polar stereographic projection at both 1 km and 4 km grid cell siz
Ice Extent - Northern Hemisphere (MASIE - NH) products provide measurements of daily sea ice extent and sea ice edge boundary for the Northern Hemisphere and 16 Arctic regions in a polar stereographic projection at both 1 km and 4 km grid cell
Extent - Northern Hemisphere (MASIE - NH) products provide measurements of daily
sea ice extent and sea ice edge boundary for the Northern Hemisphere and 16 Arctic regions in a polar stereographic projection at both 1 km and 4 km grid cell siz
sea ice extent and sea ice edge boundary for the Northern Hemisphere and 16 Arctic regions in a polar stereographic projection at both 1 km and 4 km grid cell siz
ice extent and sea ice edge boundary for the Northern Hemisphere and 16 Arctic regions in a polar stereographic projection at both 1 km and 4 km grid cell
extent and
sea ice edge boundary for the Northern Hemisphere and 16 Arctic regions in a polar stereographic projection at both 1 km and 4 km grid cell siz
sea ice edge boundary for the Northern Hemisphere and 16 Arctic regions in a polar stereographic projection at both 1 km and 4 km grid cell siz
ice edge boundary for the Northern Hemisphere and 16 Arctic regions in a
polar stereographic projection at both 1 km and 4 km grid cell sizes.
The score on PC1 shows a separation between on the one hand the position that Arctic
sea ice extent is shrinking and that this poses a threat to
polar bears (most scientific articles and science - based blogs) and on the other side the position that Arctic
sea ice is not shrinking or that it's due to natural variability and that
polar bears are not threatened (pseudo-skeptical blogs).
Most scientific articles as well as science - based blogs assess Arctic
sea ice extent to be shrinking and
polar bears to be threatened as a result, and most denier blogs take a contrary view on both
sea ice and
polar bears.
What researchers have found hasn't been encouraging, at least for
polar bears: summertime
sea ice extent in 2007 fell half below average for the past three decades.
«Two findings were most critical to FWS's listing determination: (1) extensive declines in Arctic
sea ice extent already have occurred and are projected to continue; and (2) the
polar bear depends on
sea ice for its continued survival as a species.
With
polar sea ice [not
polar ice caps] for about 30 years we have been fairly accurately measuring it, and in arctic it has significantly decreased, 2007 and 2012 were lowest
ice extent during summer.
Hi iceman, Sorry for the tardy reply, that pesky real life thing again...:) The reason there is so little excitement about the record high
sea ice extent in the antarctic (aside from it having no appealing potential victims, like
polar bears) versus the record low arctic
sea ice is probably because the southern record is only a matter of 2 % anamoly, whereas in the north we are now looking at levels over 40 % below average.
• As far as is known, the record low
extent of
sea ice in March 2017 had no impact on
polar bear health or survival.
Tagged activist scientists, advocacy, Amstrup, climate models, global warming,
Polar Bears International,
sea ice declines,
sea ice extent, September
sea ice, starving
polar bears
https://judithcurry.com/2017/01/09/skin-in-the-game/#comment-834593 When
polar sea ice has record low
extents, there is more snow and cold that follows.
That is because the
extent of
sea ice in early summer and late fall means little to
polar bears, in part because most bears eat very little then, even if they are on the
ice.
Across the Arctic, there has been only a marginal decline in total
sea ice extent (Fig. 6) between March and June, the critical spring feeding period when
polar bears require the
ice as a hunting platform for gorging on young, fat seals.