Explanations for this have included physiological barriers, an example being the decapod crustaceans, which have an inability to down - regulate blood magnesium levels sufficiently below that of seawater, leading to a loss of activity and eventual death at
polar water temperatures [57].
Not exact matches
Instead, species that immigrate from areas with higher
water temperatures and lower oxygen concentrations will establish themselves and displace the native
polar species,» says Hans - Otto Pörtner.
Due to rising
water temperatures, the Atlantic cod is moving northwards and might take over the habitat of the native
polar cod.
Rising Seas: Warmer ocean
water temperatures, the pumping of ground
water, and melting of the
polar ice sheets have added
water to the oceans, contributing to sea level rise.
[1] CO2 absorbs IR, is the main GHG, human emissions are increasing its concentration in the atmosphere, raising
temperatures globally; the second GHG,
water vapor, exists in equilibrium with
water / ice, would precipitate out if not for the CO2, so acts as a feedback; since the oceans cover so much of the planet,
water is a large positive feedback; melting snow and ice as the atmosphere warms decreases albedo, another positive feedback, biased toward the poles, which gives larger
polar warming than the global average; decreasing the
temperature gradient from the equator to the poles is reducing the driving forces for the jetstream; the jetstream's meanders are increasing in amplitude and slowing, just like the lower Missippi River where its driving gradient decreases; the larger slower meanders increase the amplitude and duration of blocking highs, increasing drought and extreme
temperatures — and 30,000 + Europeans and 5,000 plus Russians die, and the US corn crop, Russian wheat crop, and Aussie wildland fire protection fails — or extreme rainfall floods the US, France, Pakistan, Thailand (driving up prices for disk drives — hows that for unexpected adverse impacts from AGW?)
As far as this historic period is concerned, the reconstruction of past
temperatures based on deep boreholes in deep permafrost is one of the best past
temperature proxies we have (for the global regions with permafrost —
polar regions and mountainous regions)-- as a signal of average
temperatures it's even more accurate than historic direct measurements of the air
temperature, since the earth's upper crust acts as a near perfect conservator of past
temperatures — given that no
water circulation takes place, which is precisely the case in permafrost where by definition the
water is frozen.
If you ever see a good time series animation of SSTs, you will know that there is significant movement of
water and
temperatures within the world's oceans (like there is with
polar ice extents.)
Offshore winds from Canada and Greenland (with
temperatures around -20 C) carry across the warm
waters of the Labrador Sea, creating a very unstable atmosphere and immediately leading to the formation of depressions (like
polar lows).
Is it not also therefore true that the
polar areas of least
water vapor, where a greater
temperature increase from doubling of Co-2 would have the most effect, has the least W / sq - m percentage of both incoming S - W and outgoing L - W radiation due to the incident angle of incoming Sun light, the high reflectivity of the snow and ice, and the greatly reduced outgoing L - W radiation due to this?
Is it not also therefore true that the
polar areas of least
water vapor, where a greater
temperature increase from doubling of Co-2 would have the most effect, has the least percentage of both incoming S - W and outgoing L - W radiation due to the incident angle of incoming Sun light, the high reflectivity of the snow and ice, and the greatly reduced outgoing L - W radiation due to this?
Higher
temperatures in
polar regions and a decrease in the salinity of surface
water due to melting ice sheets could interrupt such circulation, the report says.
When oceans get cold, and the surface of
polar waters freezes, it snows much less and the sun takes away ice and limites the lower bound of
temperature and sea level.
Because the deep oceans receive no heat input, at least not on the scale of the circulation time, they are fairly uniformly at the
temperature of the descending
polar waters, even below the equator.
The heat arrives from the Atlantic Ocean that moves warm
water along northern Norway and western Spitsbergen where the ocean is ice - free despite freezing air
temperatures even during the months of total darkness during the
polar night.
For example, reductions in seasonal sea ice cover and higher surface
temperatures may open up new habitat in
polar regions for some important fish species, such as cod, herring, and pollock.128 However, continued presence of cold bottom -
water temperatures on the Alaskan continental shelf could limit northward migration into the northern Bering Sea and Chukchi Sea off northwestern Alaska.129, 130 In addition, warming may cause reductions in the abundance of some species, such as pollock, in their current ranges in the Bering Sea131and reduce the health of juvenile sockeye salmon, potentially resulting in decreased overwinter survival.132 If ocean warming continues, it is unlikely that current fishing pressure on pollock can be sustained.133 Higher
temperatures are also likely to increase the frequency of early Chinook salmon migrations, making management of the fishery by multiple user groups more challenging.134
The daily access heat, or loss of heat, is transferred to the oceans thru conduction and convection where it works its way to the poles and it freezes
water adding to the
polar ice caps or melts the
polar ice caps thus keeping the
temperature of the oceans, thus the earth, relatively constant.
As the Earth's surface cools further, cold conditions spread to lower latitudes but
polar surface
water and the deep ocean can not become much colder, and thus the benthic foraminifera record a
temperature change smaller than the global average surface
temperature change [43].
Given that the northern
polar region is dominated by
water, whereas the southern
polar region is dominated by land, one would expect a greater
temperature response to changes in ice extent in the Arctic than Antarctica.
Warming
temperatures boost sea levels in two ways: melting glaciers release more
water into the ocean (see What's behind the big
polar meltdown?)
Scientists believe that increasing global
temperatures are causing glaciers — the planet's largest source of fresh
water after
polar ice — to melt.
«Significant loss of ice from
polar ice sheets» Of course, this does not apply to floating ice (with the exception of small changes due to higher
temperature and
water expansion that might happen incidentally).
Norwegian, Canadian, Russian, US and other
polar scientists reported that, in the last four years, air
temperatures have increased, sea ice has declined sharply, surface
waters in the Arctic ocean have warmed and permafrost is in some areas rapidly thawing, releasing methane.