Our study on message framing and geoengineering supplies empirical support for using the two - channel model to reduce cultural
polarization over climate change science.
The result was that, overall, more scientific literacy and mathematical ability led to greater political
polarization over climate change — which, of course, is precisely what we see in the polls.
Not exact matches
The article details the escalation of partisan
polarization, particularly towards environmental protection and
climate change,
over the past few decades in America.
In addition, cultural
polarization over the validity of the
climate -
change study was lower for both U.S. and English subjects in the geoengineering condition than in the anti-pollution condition, where
polarization was actually larger for U.S. subjects than it was in the control.
It is almost universally assumed that political
polarization over societal risks like
climate change originate in different levels of trust in scientists: left - leaning people believe in human - caused
climate change, it is said, because they have a greater degree of confidence i...
It is almost universally assumed that political
polarization over societal risks like
climate change originate in different levels of tru...
We found that cultural
polarization over the validity of
climate change science is offset by making citizens aware of the potential contribution of geoengineering as a supplement to restriction of CO2 emissions.