«These results put
the polarized climate debate in sharp relief, but also point to the possibility of a path forward,» said Michael Greenstone, director of EPIC and the Milton Friedman Professor in Economics, the College, and the Harris School at the University of Chicago.
Not exact matches
Scientists have long predicted large - scale responses of infectious diseases to
climate change, giving rise to a
polarizing debate, especially concerning human pathogens for which socioeconomic drivers and control measures can limit the detection of
climate - mediated changes.
The
climate change
debate has been
polarized into a simple dichotomy.
«
Debate over
climate change has become dangerously
polarized,» he says.
I agree that cultural cognition — the idea that we shape our views so they agree with those in the groups with which we most closely identify, in the name of acceptance by our group and thus of safety — powerfully explains the
polarized passions over whether
climate change is «real,» the «
debate» that gets most of the attention about public opinion.
Levi, who has exposed overstatements on both sides of the
polarized debate, sees the pipeline as meriting approval mainly because its impact on
climate — whether approved or denied — would be minimal when placed in global context.
Coming out of Copenhagen, many participants in the international
climate negotiations (as well as informed observers), noted that the UNFCCC has real limitations as the sole venue for future
climate negotiations: too many countries — 192, excessively stringent requirements for agreement — unanimity, and a distinct tendency to
polarize debates between developed and developing countries.
But it is clear that the tensions are running high, and a troubling sense of hostility has long since
polarized the
debate, even as the real - world evidence of
climate change has piled up.
Climate scientists have become entangled in an acrimonious political
debate that has
polarized the scientific community.
«Forecast the Facts» is a front group for the individuals responsible for politicizing the science and
polarizing the
debate over
climate change.
This outcome is strong evidence that a substantial contingent of
Climate Etc. commenters individually prefer — and deliberately foster — a climate - change debate environment that is ideologically polarized & personally a
Climate Etc. commenters individually prefer — and deliberately foster — a
climate - change debate environment that is ideologically polarized & personally a
climate - change
debate environment that is ideologically
polarized & personally abusive.
Stoknes (Money and Soul), a Norwegian psychologist and economist, addresses the
polarized American
debate over anthropogenic
climate change, observing how it has devolved into «a deteriorating and desperate spiral.»
The work of greens and liberals is to challenge the Democratic demagogues, the left - wing bullies, and the
Climate McCarthyites who narrow and
polarize the
debate in ways that make effective policy action all but impossible.
Your comment is thoughtful and wise, at least in the general case, but in the case of
climate science, I object to holding those that the likes of Judith, Marc Morano and Richard S. Lindzen disparage as «the Team» and worse, responsible to be so sensitive about what «will further
polarize the
debate» when it is the deniers and their oily sponsors that are 100 % responsible for
polarizing the
debate.
Every journalist has likely experienced this effect in covering the
climate change
debate or other intensely
polarized debates, as a particular story is harshly criticized by commenters, phone callers, or letter writers from both tail ends of the spectrum of views on the issue.
Obviously, there are many excellent blogs that facilitate discussions between
climate experts, but since the
climate debate is highly
polarized and politicized, blog discussions between experts with opposing views are rare.
The public discussion on
climate change has become so
polarized that some scientists don't even acknowledge there is a
debate.
Unfortunately, judging by the
polarized and entrenched political discourse that prevails in the
climate debate, from all sides, few seem to be buying it.
The
polarized and politicized nature of the societal
debate about
climate change can make it challenging for teachers to present the science honestly, accurately, and completely.
With the stakes raised, the
climate debate became more
polarized and venomous, and scientists including Lindzen and Emanuel were tugged into the fray.
Oilprice.com: How does the media take advantage of every major — or even semi-major — weather event to make dire
climate forecasts or support one or another
polarized side of this
debate?
These conclusions generated a highly
polarized debate over the policy implications of MBH98, MBH99 for the nature of global
climate change, and whether or not anthropogenic actions are the source.»