Not exact matches
Education
policy should
focus on making sure that every student makes great progress, rather than accountability for
test scores or teacher performance pay.
«It is increasingly important to look at long - run outcomes of educational
policies, including impacts
on educational attainment and labor market outcomes, rather than just
focus on test scores.
Author Bio: Deming's work is broadly in the economics of education, with a
focus on the impact of
policies and interventions
on outcomes other than
test scores.
Koretz's research
focuses on educational assessment and
policy, particularly high - stakes
testing and its effect
on schools, as well as the validity of the
score gains.
But it is precisely the
focus on teacher evaluation — and whether it is connected to student
test scores — that is at the center of the most hotly contested education
policy debates.
Murray's earlier books — Losing Ground in 1984,
on welfare
policy, and The Bell Curve (with Richard Herrnstein) in 1994,
on the significance of differences in intelligence as measured by intelligence
tests — aroused controversy, because, implicitly or explicitly, they
focused attention
on black Americans, who play a disproportionate role in welfare
policy, and as a group
score lower than whites
on IQ
tests.
Deming's research
focuses on the economics of education, particularly the impact of education
policies on long - term outcomes as opposed to
test scores.
Education: Too Much
Focus on Testing (Seattle Times) Mentions Daniel Koretz's book, The
Testing Charade, which explains why high - stakes
policies such as graduation
tests lead to
score inflation.
The
policies that were criticized were those that increased attention to academic outcomes at the expense of children's exploration, discovery, and play; methods that
focused on large group activities and completion of one - dimensional worksheets and workbooks in place of actual engagement with concrete objects and naturally occurring experiences of the world; and directives that emphasized the use of group - administered, computer -
scored, multiple - choice achievement
tests in order to determine a child's starting place in school rather than assessments that rely
on active child engagement, teacher judgment, and clinical opinion.
Since the promotion
policy was first implemented in 1996 by Paul Vallas, it has
focused on test scores on the Iowa
test, then the IGAP, ISAT, and SAT 10.
More Than a
Score parents give CPS a «D» grade for a promotion
policy that continues to
focus too much
on test scores and ignores the value of report cards.
«If Washington, D.C., went to one extreme,» Barnum writes, «in
focusing on test - driven accountability
policies, as some argue, California has gone to the other: placing a lengthy pause
on school accountability, devolving control to local districts, eliminating certain data systems and declining to tie teacher evaluations to student
test scores.»
While The College Board and its president, David Coleman, the architect of Common Core, is
focused on increasing its dwindling market share, many colleges and universities have moved away from reliance
on such
test scores in their admission
policies.
Current education
policy focuses on a failed strategy of school and district «turnarounds;» characterized by staff shake - ups and pedagogical practices that
focus narrowly
on raising
test scores.
If Washington, D.C., went to one extreme, in
focusing on test - driven accountability
policies, as some argue, California has gone to the other: placing a lengthy pause
on school accountability, devolving control to local districts, eliminating certain data systems, and declining to tie teacher evaluations to student
test scores.
«High - quality #ECE has substantial effects
on life outcomes beyond IQ or achievement
test scores that are the
focus of attention in popular discussions of public
policy.»