Not exact matches
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced
increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in
tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other thin
tax law, such as the effect of The
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other thin
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates
increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government
policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
«Major
tax increases or
policy changes such as big hikes in the minimum wage will probably do more harm than good,» says Dahlby of the sort of programs necessary to satisfy vocal public - health boards.
He stressed that his
policy suggestions wouldn't
increase taxes, and he appeared to give a guarantee that entrepreneurs would continue to receive special treatment.
The
Tax Policy Center estimated that the debt
increase would be closer to $ 1.2 trillion.
And Trump's
policies to date — a combination of deep
tax cuts and sharp spending
increases — are shortening the fuse on that fiscal time bomb, by dramatically widening the already unsustainable gap between revenues and outlays.
The U.S. has taken a number of
policy approaches aimed at
increasing the country's innovation output, from boosting STEM education programs to offering
tax incentives on R&D research.
Overall, the most damaging
policy changes they named were
tax hikes at 41.41 percent, followed by an
increase in the minimum wage, at 31.92 percent.
The nonpartisan
Tax Policy Center said the
increase would be even smaller, at 0.002 points a year.
If the original
tax base is $ 263 billion and if nothing else changes — the assumption you have to make in assessing the effects of a
policy — then this information is enough to put some numbers on the sort of revenues you can expect to generate by an
increase in corporate
tax revenues.
Trump could also make it harder to pass lasting
tax reform, since any
policy that
increases the debt above its baseline either requires Democratic support or — if passed by a slim majority of Republicans in the Senate — would expire in a decade.
All in all, the Trump
tax plan would wastefully increase deficits by at least $ 3.5 billion over ten years — with half of all tax cuts going to the top 1 % — while actually raising taxes on nearly half of all families with children, according to the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center's (TPC) analys
tax plan would wastefully
increase deficits by at least $ 3.5 billion over ten years — with half of all
tax cuts going to the top 1 % — while actually raising taxes on nearly half of all families with children, according to the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center's (TPC) analys
tax cuts going to the top 1 % — while actually raising
taxes on nearly half of all families with children, according to the nonpartisan
Tax Policy Center's (TPC) analys
Tax Policy Center's (TPC) analysis.
The
Tax Policy Centre says
taxes would
increase by $ 500 billion, or $ 3,500 per U.S. household, while $ 110 billion will be slashed from government budgets.
Her
policies would also help the low - and middle - class since their
tax bill would remain largely the same and they will benefit from
increased government assistance.
He pointed out that global economic activity is
increasing, a
tax cut could boost growth and the European Central Bank is implementing «absurd» stimulus
policies in the euro zone.
A recent report from the Institute for
Policy Studies (IPS) points out that restaurant company CEOs receive huge
tax - subsidized paydays while their companies lobby to prevent an
increase in the minimum wage.
«The revision reflects
increased global growth momentum and the expected impact of the recently approved U.S.
tax policy changes,» the IMF said in its World Economic Outlook report, published Monday ahead of the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.
Economists Michael Gapen and Pooja Sriram noted that the tariffs come as the U.S. economy is otherwise in expansion mode, with aggressive fiscal
policy —
tax cuts and planned spending
increases, specifically — to «provide sufficient support to keep the economy in a recovery phase.»
The yield curve may also be narrowing over concerns that a boost to fiscal
policy through
tax cuts and an
increase to spending caps may foreshorten the U.S.'s second - longest economic expansion.
But it has failed to recover in recent years because of a series of
policies that
increase the burden on small - business owners — higher
taxes,
increases to health - care costs, more costly regulations, and now the minimum wage
increase proposal
On the broader economy, Federated's Macro Economic
Policy Committee recently nudged up its forecast for real 2018 GDP growth a tick to 3.0 %, in part on the anticipated stimulative effects from
tax reform, including
increased business and consumer spending.
¹ Access to cash values through borrowing or partial surrenders will reduce the
policy's cash value and death benefit,
increase the chance the
policy will lapse, and may result in a
tax liability if the
policy terminates before the death of the insured.
He presided over fiscal
policy at a time of major expansion of the Vietnam War, eventually lobbying vigorously in 1968 for a 10 percent
tax increase that many analysts said should have been imposed sooner.
The budget proposes $ 3.3 trillion in net
policy savings over ten years, the result of $ 4.9 trillion of largely unspecified spending cuts and $ 1.6 trillion of
tax cuts, in addition to $ 1.4 trillion of claimed savings due to
increased economic growth.
That was dropped and the latest
tax policies seem to abandon much of the strong mechanism for reducing trade deficits with
policies that
increase the fiscal deficit and thus capital account surplus.
It is worth noting that the B.C. government's gimmick of limiting the upper - income
tax increase to two years, while perhaps making the move more politically palatable for its base, is bad public
policy.
Let me briefly mention a few steps that could be taken to
increase the economy's potential over time — immigration
policies that attract workers with scarce skills to the United States; education
policies and job retraining programs that build and replenish human capital; spending on infrastructure to remove bottlenecks;
tax simplification and the elimination of
tax policies that distort investment and saving decisions; regulatory
policies that are attentive to costs and benefits and that emphasize getting the incentives right.
The contingency reserve would not be used to finance new
policy initiatives, such as the Family
Tax Cut and the
increase to the Universal Child Care Benefit.
The Trump administration, for example, wants not just to force a contraction in the trade deficit but has also proposed
policies aimed at
increasing U.S. investment, partly by making investment more profitable (cutting corporate
taxes and rebuilding American infrastructure) and partly by
increasing savings (cutting
taxes on the very wealthy).
Fiscal
policy can slow down the economy through
tax increases or spending cuts.
Five years of failed austerity
policies in Greece and a total breakdown in trust between the leftwing Syriza alliance and the political leaders of its creditors climaxed in a national vote in which Greeks said no to the spending cuts and
tax increases demanded by its lenders...
But the same can be said for other
policies designed to improve economic outcomes for the bulk of citizens —
increasing the minimum wage,
increased spending on infrastructure, establishing a guaranteed minimum base income, regulatory reforms,
increased spending on R&D, cuts in corporate
taxes, whatever your favorites may be.
Although the payment of the insurance premiums is not
tax deductible, any
increase in the cash value of the insurance
policy due to investment gains is not
taxed until you begin to withdraw the money after you retire.
According to a 2016 report from the
Tax Policy Center, «Taxpayers with incomes over $ 100,000 would have the largest tax increases both in dollars and as a percentage of income.&raq
Tax Policy Center, «Taxpayers with incomes over $ 100,000 would have the largest
tax increases both in dollars and as a percentage of income.&raq
tax increases both in dollars and as a percentage of income.»
About 39 % of respondents said fiscal
policy, which has included
tax increases and automatic federal spending cuts, was «too restrictive,» while 21 % thought it was «too stimulative.»
Likewise, recent estimates by the
Tax Policy Center and the Penn Wharton Budget Model show that dynamic effects would marginally reduce the revenue loss in the first decade but significantly
increase it over the long run because of the economic consequences of higher debt.
One manifestation of Finance's power has been the
increasing tendency to use the
tax system to deliver social and industrial policy — a quick glance at the Department of Finance's annual, ever - expanding Tax Expenditures report (first introduced under the short - lived Joe Clark government) tells the ta
tax system to deliver social and industrial
policy — a quick glance at the Department of Finance's annual, ever - expanding
Tax Expenditures report (first introduced under the short - lived Joe Clark government) tells the ta
Tax Expenditures report (first introduced under the short - lived Joe Clark government) tells the tale.
Specific
policies include a Canada Employment Credit and
Tax Fairness Plan to reduce taxes for working families and seniors; tax credits for public transit, kid's sports, textbooks, tools, and apprentices; increased support to the provinces and territories to create new child care spaces; increasing the Senior Age Credit amount by an additional $ 1,000; and allowing income splitting for caregivers of family members with disabiliti
Tax Fairness Plan to reduce
taxes for working families and seniors;
tax credits for public transit, kid's sports, textbooks, tools, and apprentices; increased support to the provinces and territories to create new child care spaces; increasing the Senior Age Credit amount by an additional $ 1,000; and allowing income splitting for caregivers of family members with disabiliti
tax credits for public transit, kid's sports, textbooks, tools, and apprentices;
increased support to the provinces and territories to create new child care spaces;
increasing the Senior Age Credit amount by an additional $ 1,000; and allowing income splitting for caregivers of family members with disabilities.
As a result, the Senate bill
increases the debt by $ 1.4 trillion using conventional scoring but sets up a potential true cost of up to $ 1.9 trillion, or $ 2.2 trillion including interest, assuming expiring
policies are continued and certain future
tax hikes are ignored.
The sustained economic downturn is a result of the job killing NDP government
policies (i.e. 50 %
increase of minimum wage; carbon
tax — the biggest hidden
tax in Alberta history; and out of control spending and borrowing).
- Governments offer myriad
tax supports and other
policies to help businesses in a wide range of areas, from skills training to capital investment
tax credits to export insurance to rebates for
increasing energy efficiency.
According to an analysis from the
Tax Policy Center, the bill would reduce taxes for Americans in all income groups in 2018 — increasing after - tax income by an average of 2.2 perce
Tax Policy Center, the bill would reduce
taxes for Americans in all income groups in 2018 —
increasing after -
tax income by an average of 2.2 perce
tax income by an average of 2.2 percent.
New
policy decisions announced in the Budget included personal income
tax cuts,
increased spending on defence and domestic security, and reform of higher education and Medicare.
The result will be a
tax increase in 2027 for more than half of all Americans — 53 percent, according to an analysis from the Tax Policy Cent
tax increase in 2027 for more than half of all Americans — 53 percent, according to an analysis from the
Tax Policy Cent
Tax Policy Center.
She is kind of settled with this too because she talked about that with the
tax cut and the fiscal
policy today which was good, not in any type of derogatory way, but she is worried about maybe the
increase in debt, but she's hoping that if this
tax cut is stimulative it will be supply - side leaning and we will get greater productivity growth which she said would be the good type of growth that she wants.
Since 2016, the Commonwealth government has been forced to shut down 179 primary and secondary schools,
increase the sales
tax to 11.5 %, and «sharply [raise] electricity and water rates,» while calling for a $ 450 million cut to the island's public university — all
policies that hurt the nearly half of Puerto Ricans living below the poverty line.
Some of the
tax increases and other
policies revealed today do not help attract the investment needed to create jobs and sustain / grow our economy.
Importantly, reconciliation legislation can include provisions with costs, such as
tax credits for health insurance or other
tax and spending
policies replacing Obamacare, as long as the net effect of the bill complies with the reconciliation instructions and does not
increase the deficit beyond the budget window.
According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), recent changes to
tax policy and the budget will
increase the U.S. Treasury debt burden by a combined $ 1.8 trillion over 10 years ($ 1.46 trillion from
tax policy and $ 320 billion related to the recent federal budget
increase, on a «gross» basis).
The Abe administration still intends to
increase the consumption
tax in 2019; spring wage negotiations are underway; and given recent yen strength, it would be difficult for the BOJ to justify an abrupt change in
policy as financial conditions tighten.
Temporary
tax increases still hold the economy back by creating
policy unpredictability.