Too many entrepreneurs misinterpret an open - door
policy as an obligation to be available to their team every minute of every day.
Not exact matches
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our
obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals
as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such
as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension
obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such
as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such
as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such
as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers,
as well
as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco
as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government
policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
(a) Schedule 2.7 (a) of the Disclosure Schedule contains a list setting forth each employee benefit plan, program,
policy or arrangement (including any «employee benefit plan»
as defined in Section 3 (3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974,
as amended («ERISA»)(«ERISA Plan»)-RRB-, including, without limitation, employee pension benefit plans,
as defined in Section 3 (2) of ERISA, multi-employer plans,
as defined in Section 3 (37) of ERISA, employee welfare benefit plans,
as defined in Section 3 (1) of ERISA, deferred compensation plans, stock option plans, bonus plans, stock purchase plans, fringe benefit plans, life, hospitalization, disability and other insurance plans, severance or termination pay plans and
policies, sick pay plans and vacation plans or arrangements, whether or not an ERISA Plan (including any funding mechanism therefore now in effect or required in the future
as a result of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or otherwise), whether formal or informal, oral or written, under which (i) any current or former employee, director or individual consultant of the Company (collectively, the «Company Employees») has any present or future right to benefits and which are contributed to, sponsored by or maintained by the Company or (ii) the Company or any ERISA Affiliate (
as hereinafter defined) has had, has or may have any actual or contingent present or future liability or
obligation.
[1] The «on average» specification allows the Bank to take account of the fact that it can not finetune inflation over short periods, and of the
obligation to promote, insofar
as monetary
policy can, full employment, which is another of the Bank's charter
obligations.
Subject to any applicable terms and conditions set forth in Realty Income's Privacy
Policy, any communication or other material that you send to Realty Income through the Internet or post on a Realty Income website by electronic mail or otherwise, such
as any questions, comments, suggestions or the like, is and will be deemed to be non-confidential and Realty Income shall have no
obligation of any kind with respect to such information.
As members of the Opposition it is our civic moral
obligation to every taxpayer in Alberta to question the government on their
policies and actions to ensure that Albertans get the most from their representation.
Just make sure that the term
policy will definitely cover the entire length of a financial
obligation,
as you'll have a harder time finding coverage and have to pay higher rates if you still need life insurance at age 80 or 90.
A permanent
policy is also likely a better choice,
as it can be incredibly difficult to purchase coverage after age 90 if you still have financial
obligations.
«The data clearly shows that the best
policy to protect the mortgage market is to protect the jobs of Canadians, because history shows us that
as long
as they have jobs, they will meet their
obligations,» says Taylor.
A Democrat being a Christian is nothing new... and a Democrat justifying
policies with moral
obligations is nothing new either,
as well
as Republicans questioning their
policies for other reasons... Obama is not at all unique in this manner.
«I have it to do» is the mark of a morally serious leader who does not take counsel from focus groups
as to the
policy course of choice, but who accepts the burden of leadership
as an
obligation of honor,
as Marshall and Eisenhower did.
Other
policies can be highly local, for example, health coverage could easily be done on a state or even county level without an easy way for the
policies to be circumvented - sure, people can move to a different state / county but what counts
as a
policy in this case is the
obligation residents have to pay in to the system and what their benefits are from it, so moving from state to state would not subvert the
policies, it just changes the number of people subject to these
policies.
We have also seen the success of the pension fund industry
as a text book example of where government
policy set clear parameters for participation, led by example and enforced legal
obligations.
«We have an
obligation as policymakers and influencers to protect our youth from the lifelong health problems associated with picking up that first cigarette,» wrote Michael Seilback, vice president for public
policy and communications for the American Lung Association in the Northeast.
The State entity will ensure that charter schools and local educational agencies serving charter schools post on their websites materials with respect to charter school student recruitment, student orientation, enrollment criteria, student discipline
policies, behavior codes, and parent contract requirements, including any financial
obligations (such
as fees for tutoring or extracurricular activity).
It added that the Louisville School Board had «treated the ideal of an integrated system
as much more than a legal
obligation — they consider it a positive, desirable
policy and an essential element of any well - rounded public school education.»
Should charters be held to enrollment standards that other schools can not meet, while districts continue to practice questionable
policies such
as the warehousing of special need students in select placements (while often failing to follow - though on their
obligations for services, we might add)?
That it means pushing for a rollback of federal education
policy that have helped black and brown children
as well
as a return to the bad old days when states and districts were allowed to ignore their
obligations to poor and minority children doesn't factor into any of their thinking.
Just
as importantly, eight decades of court rulings — driven by the courtroom work of civil rights activists and school funding equity advocates — also provides reformers with the legal arguments necessary to challenge tenure laws and other
policies that impede the constitutional
obligation of states to provide children with high - quality education.
Since administration of standardized tests is part of a teacher's job duties, a teacher's encouragement of opting would be viewed by the district
as being disruptive of its
obligation under state law and district
policy.»
[81] While these contingent commitments are not an
obligation and do not guarantee receipt of RRIF or TIFIA credit assistance,
as applicable, they represent an agreement between the DOT and a project sponsor to provide credit assistance subject to the satisfaction of all of the terms and conditions for credit assistance set forth under the RRIF or TIFIA statutes,
as applicable, including satisfaction of Federal eligibility requirements (such
as the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969) and the availability of budgetary authority for such credit assistance.
Ensure that employees and managers are aware of this Order and all other applicable
policies and procedures, and understand the
obligations as indicated.
As a partner of Apple, we have an
obligation to respect its
policies for apps and the books offered in apps.
Insurance
policies are high credit quality
obligations, they don't vary
as much
as bonds that are risky.
The one advantage of whole - life is that
as long
as contractual
obligations are made (you make the payments) the
policy never expires.
A permanent
policy is also likely a better choice,
as it can be incredibly difficult to purchase coverage after age 90 if you still have financial
obligations.
Just make sure that the term
policy will definitely cover the entire length of a financial
obligation,
as you'll have a harder time finding coverage and have to pay higher rates if you still need life insurance at age 80 or 90.
In addition to remaining in effect
as long
as you pay your monthly premiums and keep any other
obligations per your contract with the insurance company, these type of
policies also accrue «cash value».
Subject to any applicable terms and conditions set forth in Realty Income's Privacy
Policy, any communication or other material that you send to Realty Income through the Internet or post on a Realty Income website by electronic mail or otherwise, such
as any questions, comments, suggestions or the like, is and will be deemed to be non-confidential and Realty Income shall have no
obligation of any kind with respect to such information.
Nothing contained herein shall be construed
as limiting or reducing our responsibilities and
obligations to customers in accordance with our Privacy
Policy for Consumers.
As the outstanding principal of an installment - based
policy is paid down by the issuer of an MBIA - insured
obligation, less premium is collected and recognized by MBIA.
As a Site user, you are responsible for regularly reviewing our Notices and Policies in order to remain informed of our practices and your obligations as you visit and use our Sit
As a Site user, you are responsible for regularly reviewing our Notices and
Policies in order to remain informed of our practices and your
obligations as you visit and use our Sit
as you visit and use our Site.
The evidence for this widespread failure to understand the practical significance of seeing climate change
as a moral issue includes the almost universal failure of the press or advocates of climate change
policies to ask those governments, businesses, organizations, or individuals who oppose national climate change
policies on the grounds of national economic cost alone whether they deny that in addition to national economic interest nations must comply with their
obligations, duties, and responsibilities to prevent harm to millions of poor, vulnerable people around the world.
As people of faith, our
policy positions are informed by the moral
obligation to advocate alongside those who must suffer from the impacts of climate change.
Yet, many nations continue to make national commitments under the UNFCCC
as if national economic self - interest rather than ethical
obligations is an adequate basis for determining national
policies on climate change.
A major significance for
policy of understanding climate change
as a moral and justice issue, is that nations may not look at economic self - interest alone in formulating
policies, they must consider their ethical and moral
obligations to those who are most vulnerable to climate change.
To overcome barriers, a range of
policy instruments are being deployed such
as renewable heat
obligations in building codes and a range of financial incentives.
The evidence for this widespread failure to understand the practical significance of seeing climate change
as a moral issue includes the almost universal failure of the press or advocates of climate change
policies to ask businesses, organizations, or individuals who oppose national climate change
policies on the grounds of economic cost alone, whether they deny that, in addition to economic interests, nations must comply with their
obligations, duties, and responsibilities to prevent harm to millions of poor, vulnerable people around the world.
Some high - emitting nations have expressly stated that they will not adopt climate change
policies that harm their economy — thus ignoring their
obligations to others
as a matter of ethics, justice, and international law.
Some high - emitting nations have expressly stated that they will not adopt climate change
policies that harm their economy thus ignoring their
obligations to others
as a matter of ethics, justice, and international law.
On the contrary, when scientific results have
policy implications, we believe it is an
obligation of climate scientists to draw attention to those implications.Otherwise,
as history has shown, we run the risk of laypeople drawing conclusions about this complex issue that are erroneous, ill - informed, misleading and counterproductive.
As a result, nations have failed to adopt climate change
policies consistent with their equitable
obligations despite the fact that all nations who are parties to the UNFCCC agreed, when they became parties, to reduce their emissions to levels required of them based upon «equity» to prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system.
A strong ethical case can be made that if nations have duties to limit their ghg emissions to their fair share of safe global emissions, a conclusion that follows both
as a matter of ethics and justice and several international legal principles including, among others, the «no harm principle,» and promises nations made in the 1992 UNFCCC to adopt
policies and measures required to prevent dangerous anthropocentric interference with the climate system in accordance with equity and common but differentiated responsibilities, nations have a duty to clearly explain how their national ghg emissions reductions commitments arguably satisfy their ethical
obligations to limit their ghg emissions to the nation's fair share of safe global emissions.
Bill 168, which came into force in 2010, created an
obligation for employers to proactively assess the risk of workplace violence and harassment,
as well
as develop
policies and procedures for investigating and handling complaints and incidents.
In allowing the appeal
as it related to «collective» claims by creditors, the Court of Appeal observed that there are no
policy reasons for artificially limiting the procedural options open to a Trustee in fulfilling its core
obligation of bringing in the assets of the bankrupt.
This
obligation applies to any insurance company offering first - party insurance
policies, including life and homeowner's insurance,
as well
as auto coverage and workers» compensation insurance.
This privacy notice, together with our Cookies
Policy, fulfils our
obligation to tell you about the ways in which we use your information
as a result of you using this website.
In rejecting the practice group's claim, the New Jersey Supreme Court confirmed that the rule applies only to third - party
policies, and held that the
policy in question was not a third - party
policy because the practice group, which owned the
policy, was named
as the beneficiary, and no payment
obligation ran to the physician.
The cases serve
as a backdrop for highlighting social dynamics at play in elder abuse cases, comparing relevant legislation across the country, clarifying legal
obligations to respond to elder abuse under legislation and professional codes of ethics, and making recommendations for protocol and
policy development, and professional development and training to support the practice of health care and social service workers in the area of elder abuse and neglect.»
But the Texas Supreme Court overturned the decision, refusing to create a public
policy exception to the at - will nature of a partnership for carrying out one's ethical
obligations to report unethical conduct (such
as overbilling).