Sentences with phrase «policy debate between»

Instead, we should have a legitimate policy debate between the center - right and the center - left on what to do about climate change.

It could be parsed as a Pangaean Affairs article by an editorial collective of ammonites critical of the elitist vertibrate policy debate between coprolite carbon sequestration advocates, and radical therapods demanding more tree fern peatbeds to fuel posterity's struggle to power through Snowball Earth episodes in epochs to come.

The policy debate between the two main parties — in reality fought on very narrow ground — had only a weak influence on the outcome.

Overall, judging by the rapturous applause he received, Miliband was in sublime form: dynamic, incisive, intelligent (a man who can quote the 1648 Treaty of Westphalia and apply it to the current foreign policy debate between those who oppose liberal interventionism based on the principle of nation state sovereignty and those who support it based on the natural rights of individuals superseding that sovereignty certainly deserves this accolade) and even at times funny.

Not exact matches

«l don't think you can really argue that the market is not doing well, [but] whether there is a correlation between that and the policies could be discussed and debated.

Ken Bone (C), a power plant employee from Belleville, Illinois, waits in the audience to ask a question about energy policy and jobs during the presidential debate between Republican U.S. presidential nominee Donald Trump and Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton at Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri, October 9, 2016.

The debate prior to this crisis can be (perhaps simplistically) characterised as between those who argued that an inflation - targeting central bank should care about asset prices to the extent that they affected the forecasts of output and inflation over the policy horizon, and those who argued that additional attention needed to be paid to asset prices and the possibility of credit imbalances.

Using Pakistan as a case study, this article analyzes the ongoing debate and concludes that while there is merit to arguments on both sides, prudent policy recommendations for the governance of the United States» covert drone program fall somewhere in between.

The past forty years have brought a recovery of the idea of just war in Christian ethical discourse, and this has invigorated a larger engagement with the just war idea in policy debate, in the military sphere, in philosophical thought, and in dialogue between moral reflection and international law.

We need a debate between two versions of policy wonkery.

He explains that while that «sincere, personal opposition» can not be «enacted law and public policy» without harming gay couples and violating the Fourteenth Amendment, he favors a continued «open and searching debate» between those who favor and oppose same - sex marriage.

Without the cover and pampering by the press, last night's debate clearly showed your faux liberal god for what he truly is... a man clearly in over his head and incapable of distinguishing between talking points, policies, and facts.

As part of his LCA address, ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, addressed the recurring issue of national champions, claiming the current debate confuses the distinction between industrial and merger policy.

But there is also another aspect related to the backlog that is missing in current debate, despite the attempts of current government to blame for the backlog the previous one, the reality is that immigration policy continues to produce irregular residents and in - between cases.

There was ample substantive policy discussion at this morning's Crain's NY Business debate between the five men vying for the GOP line in the NYC mayor's race, but that was largely overshadowed by a verbal tiff between the moderator, Crain's columnist Greg David, and former MTA Chairman Joe Lhota, who took offense when David referred to his former boss, Rudy Giuliani, as a «jerk.»

This trend was partly caused by the first televised debates, of course, but may also be due to the limited difference between the parties» policies.

[1] An good recent debate on the Venezuelan economy that represents both pro- and anti-Chávez positions can be found on al - Jazeera and is between Mark Weisbrot and economist with the Centre for Economic Policy and Research and Arturo Porzecanski, an international finance and Latin American economic analyst http://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/insidestoryamericas/2013/02/201321384852270930.html

What this means is that there is important political slippage between the tax policy debate in Washington and the way it is heard by many Americans.

In normal times, the debate over monetary policy is between «hawks» who want the Fed to emphasize its inflation target, and «doves» who want it to focus on lowering unemployment.

Yet, his intention was certainly not to avoid debate over policy - proposals and between candidates.

Throughout the campaign for the 7 May elections, Miliband insisted that David Cameron should debate him one on one as part of a televised election broadcast [104] in order to highlight differences in policies between the two major parties, but this was never to happen, with the pair instead being interviewed separately by Jeremy Paxman as part of the first major televised political broadcast of the election involving multiple parties.

But, one need look no further than the current debate in the UK over the EU referendum to find other parallels with Repeal — e.g., an internal split in the Conservative party over British identity (particularly in a world with increasing trade linkages); the difficulty in ascertaining the winners and losers from a fundamental reorientation of trade policy, amidst inherent uncertainty; the existence of tensions between different sectors and regions, stemming from trade exposure; and so on.

«During the course of the campaign, we look forward to a spirited debate between innovative smart on crime» policies that make all New Yorkers safer, and the traditional approach that has not reduced crime.»

The Speakers» Corner Trust website has been hosting a debate between IPPR and Policy Exchange on the relationship between society and state which resonates with this discussion.

The debate, on defence and foreign policy, threatened to reveal deeply - held splits on the topic of the EU between the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats.

He said the last time there was a lack of foreign policy discussed in a national campaign was 12 years ago, right before the Sept. 11 attacks (and to be sure, I don't think King was trying to draw a direct correlation between Sept. 11 and a lack of debate on security).

Amid the debate on raising the state minimum wage, the labor - backed Fiscal Policy Institute released an analysis that contends business profits per worker increased much more than labor compensation in the state between 2001 and 2013.

Of course, they don't agree on every detail of every policy, but I think it's good to have that debate between the shadow chancellor and the leader of the party.

CHELSEA — Conversation was less about policy and more about the past at Monday's debate between Yetta Kurland and Corey Johnson, both vying to replace Speaker Christine Quinn on the City Council.

And that feeling extended to the debate itself, as they seemed unable or unwilling to articulate clear and sharp policy differences between them, despite several attempts to draw them out.

(CNN)- Mobster and crook references aside, the Illinois Senate debate between Democrat Alexi Giannoulias and Republican Mark Kirk covered substantive policy issues, from their positions on the bank bailouts to the effectiveness of the stimulus bill.

My point here is not to debate these policies, but to observe one of the differences between normal voters and political junkies such as myself and (probably) you.

UKIP's Tim Aker and Labour's Vernon Coaker debate policies after the challenges between their party leaders.

Public Advocate Letitia James, a Democrat running for reelection, squared off against her Republican opponent, J.C. Polanco, in a friendly yet competitive debate on Monday that highlighted substantive differences, and some shared opinions, between the two candidates on a range of policy issues.

With the party divided between social and economic liberals, debates on nuclear power, the economy, tuition fees, green policy and taxation are unlikely to yield unanimous responses, resulting in internal division which may hinder the party's ability to project a clear and consistent message in the run up to 2015.

At Wednesday's second, and final, debate between Mayor Bill de Blasio and Republican challenger Nicole Malliotakis (plus «Dump the Mayor» party candidate Bo Dietl), Malliotakis showed how to rebuild the Republican Party post-Trump, and she's giving the mayor some credible competition on policy missteps.

This masks the trade - offs between short - and long - term policies at the heart of today's political and ethical debates.

Monckton's father - in - law is Lord Lawson of Blaby (Nigel Lawson, former UK Chancellor of the Exchequer), who has contributed many times to the public debate on climate change, most recently in a speech to the Centre for Policy Studies, in which he drew parallels between climate researchers and Islamic fundamentalists.

Moderating the Debate examines the complex - and often problematic - relations between education research, policy, and practice.

By building strong collaborations between researchers, community organizations, and policy makers, The Civil Rights Project hopes to raise the level of discourse on targeted issues and to reframe the tone and content of many of the current legal and political debates.

The 4,000 teachers, social entrepreneurs, policy makers and business leaders attending the Impact Conference will debate and discuss how to the new government can work with teachers, charities and business to ensure no child falls through the gaps between education, employment or training.

For all the policy chatter and debate out there about funding inequities (between charters and neighborhood schools is one favorite), you don't hear much talk about just how inequitable the funding gaps can be among the 15,000 or so school districts (or among schools within the same district — don't even get me started).

And there is the uncomfortable interaction between faith and public policy, which has led to contentious public debates that have driven decades of controversial and often contradictory decisions by state legislatures, the courts, Congress, and the White House.

The debate between the two policy analysts, which appears to have influenced both majority and minority opinions of the court, is presented in the upcoming issue of Education Next.

The fourth annual State of American Education will consist of a crossfire - style debate between two thought leaders in education policy who will discuss emerging issues in education reform at the national level.

Whether deciding school policy for an upcoming year or debating the consequences for an individual student arising from a single incident of misbehavior, educators juggle several factors: striking a balance between an orderly campus and a welcoming climate conducive to learning; protecting the safety of all students while recognizing the rights of individuals; treating students equitably but, when warranted, considering individual circumstances that influence behavior; and, in concert with every school's educative mission, convincing students who are behaving badly to correct their behavior while also standing ready to banish anyone who interferes with the learning of others.

Education policy became a debate between the forces that felt the purpose of education was to build citizens who were self - assured and of independent minds and those that advocated the development of obedient and loyal subjects for the Meiji government.

The debate between phonics and whole language entered the national political realm, resulting in policy that some believed would resolve the so - called «reading wars» (Ravitch, 2000).

So while ugly episodes in our country's history should not be ignored, the relevance of sectarian strikes and nativists campaigns in the mid 19th century, to the current debates about school vouchers, and other important policy debates relating to the relationship between church and state, is highly suspect, I think, for several reasons.

Currently, education - policy debates in the United States are divided between two warring camps: On one side are «school reformers,» who argue that efforts to improve equity for low - income youngsters must focus on fixing failing schools.