Sentences with phrase «policy divergences as»

It's impossible to predict when these might overcome the current policy divergences as a dollar driver, but the most recent data suggests that time is not imminent.

Not exact matches

«Policy divergence is expected to remain a prominent theme,» Canadian policy makers said in their December 2 statement, new language that read as a reminder to currency traders that the Bank of Canada sets policy independent of thPolicy divergence is expected to remain a prominent theme,» Canadian policy makers said in their December 2 statement, new language that read as a reminder to currency traders that the Bank of Canada sets policy independent of thpolicy makers said in their December 2 statement, new language that read as a reminder to currency traders that the Bank of Canada sets policy independent of thpolicy independent of the Fed.

These contrasting inflation outlooks suggest further monetary policy divergence is ahead (read more on this divergence and its investing implications in our recent post Opportunities emerge as central banks diverge.).

We expect interest rates to rise, as U.S. and eurozone monetary policies gradually normalize, though structural factors and further central bank divergence are likely to keep a lid on rates.

We see policy divergence between the US and eurozone returning as an investment theme.

It's our view that volatility should increase as the world moves from the pervasively synchronized easy monetary policy that we've seen over the past several years to the policy divergence that is showing up today.

The dollar rocketed higher in 2014 - 2015 on the back of monetary policy divergence, however I'd view the dollar's weakening in 2016 - 2017 as a correction of this move back towards PPP levels.

«The SNB cites the likelihood of increased divergence in monetary policy, probably with the ECB vs the Fed in mind, as a reason for the timing of the floor discontinuation,» said Morten Thrane Helt, senior analyst at Danske Bank.

Second, when measured by state - level policy, the political divergence among regions of the U.S. has become much more pronounced in the last 20 years — as it also has in terms of the presidential vote, among other metrics.

We see policy divergence between the US and eurozone returning as an investment theme.

As it stands, developed economies are in different stages of the cycle (Japan and Europe versus everybody else), and that is fuelling policy divergence, which will create discrepancies in relative valuations in a global context.

Infrastructure as a political football is symptomatic of competing visions for the nation's energy — a divergence that makes energy policy a key issue for U.S. voters this year.

I've also cut off discussion of divergence as a general topic, per my previous comment and general policy on off topic.

As for lying, I have observed many scientists seem to have no difficulty with lying when they connect, without a shred of evidence, supportive modeling or any data or often even any theory such things as extreme weather is getting worse or is linked to CO2, wet areas will get wetter and dry areas will get drier, that the ocean swallowed the «missing heat», using a proxy upside down doesn't matter, the models are still adequate for policy even after such a huge divergence from reality, coral die - back is due to manmade warming rather than fishing, all warming must be bad rather than beyond a certain threshold, etc, etc, etcAs for lying, I have observed many scientists seem to have no difficulty with lying when they connect, without a shred of evidence, supportive modeling or any data or often even any theory such things as extreme weather is getting worse or is linked to CO2, wet areas will get wetter and dry areas will get drier, that the ocean swallowed the «missing heat», using a proxy upside down doesn't matter, the models are still adequate for policy even after such a huge divergence from reality, coral die - back is due to manmade warming rather than fishing, all warming must be bad rather than beyond a certain threshold, etc, etc, etcas extreme weather is getting worse or is linked to CO2, wet areas will get wetter and dry areas will get drier, that the ocean swallowed the «missing heat», using a proxy upside down doesn't matter, the models are still adequate for policy even after such a huge divergence from reality, coral die - back is due to manmade warming rather than fishing, all warming must be bad rather than beyond a certain threshold, etc, etc, etc..

The divergence problem is well known to anyone, the public and policy makers alike, who take the trouble to read the literature behind the graphic presentations of the reconstructions - graphics, which are of necessity, simplified as compared to the actual literature and show how 20th century warming is unprecendented.

Some may argue that the divergence issue is well discussed in the specific literature, but the issue as I see it is the degree of certainty that other scientists, policy makers, and lay people would conclude from the graphics.

That is no surprise at first, as to oppose an EU policy a divergence of the goals is a must.

The divergence in the law between Australia and the U.S. serves as a reminder that case law and patent office policies vary from country to country.