Not exact matches
TOUGH: Well, I think part of it has to do with education
policy, that we've been so
focused on standardized tests as the measure of whether a school is doing well that we're not giving schools the time and the incentive to work
on these other skills.
Debates about school choice
policies often
focus on their impacts
on student achievement, typically as measured by
standardized tests.
Gordon Lafer, in an in - depth report this year for the Economic
Policy Institute (EPI), notes that Rocketship's educational model rests
on four strategies: «the replacement of teachers with computers for a significant portion of the day; a reliance
on young and inexperienced teachers for the rest of the day; narrowing the curriculum to math and reading with little attention to other subjects; and even within these subjects, a relentless
focus on preparing students for
standardized tests.»
They conclude with
policy prescriptions, starting with the need to change from a
focus on standardized tests to what is still the «black box» of actual student learning and to changing classroom practices, particularly formative assessment.
Rather than
focus on poverty, language barriers, unmet special education needs and inadequate funding of public schools, the charter school proponents and Malloy apologists want students, parents, teachers and the public to believe that a pre-occupation with
standardized testing, a
focus on math and English, «zero - tolerance» disciplinary
policies for students and undermining the teaching profession will force students to «succeed» while solving society's problems.
ASCD's Director of Public
Policy, David Griffith, explains that due to an overreliance
on standardized testing, schools are seeing an increased «
focus on test taking and
test preparation» and less emphasis
on «actual knowledge and achievement for students.»