This renewed crisis in the Eurozone comes at a time when the European economies appear to be slowing down after a strong first quarter, and despite this,
policy interest rate increases by the ECB are expected in the coming months.
Not exact matches
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced
increases in the build
rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build
rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange
rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount
rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit
ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of
interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher
interest payments should
interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any
interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange
rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government
policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
Lane added some texture to the central bank's decision to
increase interest rates, saying
policy makers were encouraged by «widespread strength» in exports and business investment.
The 30 - day Fed Fund futures can be used as a guide to predict when the Fed might
increase interest rates since the prices are an expression of trader's views on the likelihood of changes in U.S. monetary
policy.
The most important
policy action for mitigating the damage of a recession is for the central bank to keep
interest rates low, according to the respondents, followed by
increasing spending on transportation and other infrastructure projects.
Under that
policy, the Federal Reserve has kept
interest rates low and engaged for period of years in a campaign of aggressive bond purchases that have
increased monetary supply and bolstered the stock market.
In response to economic weakness, central banks often enact
policy that
increases the money supply, promotes inflation and reduces
interest rates.
This implies any given
increase in
policy interest rates is likely to have a bigger economic impact than was the case pre-crisis.
According to commodity guru Jim Rogers, this is illustrated by a string of Quantitative Easings by the U.S. Fed, an ultra-low
interest rate policy and ever -
increasing U.S. debt.
After a number of years of Zero
Interest Rate Policy (ZIRP), the increase in rates stopped for around 11 months until December 2016 when the Federal Reserve promised to increase interest rates by 25 basis
Interest Rate Policy (ZIRP), the
increase in
rates stopped for around 11 months until December 2016 when the Federal Reserve promised to
increase interest rates by 25 basis
interest rates by 25 basis points.
The central bank's negative
interest -
rate policy - which effectively charges commercial lenders for deposits - has also
increased pressure on lenders to put money to work, prompting Japan's roughly 100 regional banks to raise efficiency or merge.
Rapidly
increasing interest rates causing contract holders to surrender life insurance and annuity
policies, thereby causing realized investment losses, and reduced hedge performance related to variable annuities;
It's true that demographic forces are leading to slower growth in the labour force, which reduces the neutral
interest rate in the economy and
increases the chances that monetary
policy will be constrained by the lower bound on
interest rates.
Central banks such as the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank (Fed) use monetary
policy tactics, including
interest rate moves and
increasing or decreasing the monetary supply, to try and influence the level of inflation, stimulate the economy and spur employment.
Early in the summer
interest rates increased fairly dramatically when the Fed suggested that monetary
policy would soon become less accommodating (what became known as «the taper»), and we became hopeful that attractive opportunities would develop.
Policy makers also are worried that a decade of ultra-low borrowing costs has made Canadians extra-sensitive to
interest -
rate increases, which could force the central bank to take a slower path back to normal.
Measured across all loan products, and taking into account changes in customer risk margins, however, it seems that
interest rates paid on average by small businesses have
increased by a little less than the rise in
interest rates directly due to the tightening of monetary
policy.
Current market pricing suggests that an
interest rate increase at the March 14 - 15
policy meeting is all but a done deal, a move that would bring the Fed's benchmark
interest rate target range to 1.5 % -1.75 %.
Notwithstanding the recent
increases in
interest rates, the stance of monetary
policy is not unduly restricting growth at present.
The Bank of England confused markets as they voted 7 - 2 to sustain the current
interest rate policy, even though consensus assumed a 25 basis point
increase.
Additionally, the price for a standard UL
policy can
increase as you age if the illustrated
interest rates drop or the internal cost of insurance
increases.
Federal Reserve
policy makers are set to meet next week, and while there is little expectation that an
interest -
rate increase will be announced when the meeting ends on Wednesday, the latest economic reading could sway the Fed's outlook.
Hints of a tighter monetary
policy from the ECB and anunlikely
interest rate increase from the SNB confirm that both central banksare moving in opposite directions.
The Bank of Canada has also
increased its
interest rate, reversing some of the
policy insurance it took out earlier when the outlook was less positive.
Since we last met, the Federal Reserve has
increased interest rates twice and the
policy rate in the United States now stands at 1 1/4 per cent.
Many types of permanent life insurance
policies increase in value over time based on
interest rates.
Nevertheless, the apparent success of the ECB's
policy in overcoming the threat of deflation
increased speculation about a potential tightening of monetary
policy, possibly even before the cessation of the central bank's bond purchases — scheduled to continue for at least the rest of the year — and in the wake of the ECB meeting pushed market estimates of the odds of a rise in official
interest rates before the end of 2017 to more than 50 %.
Monetary
policy has less room to maneuver when
interest rates are close to zero, while expansionary fiscal
policy is likely both more effective and less costly in terms of
increased debt burden when
interest rates are pinned at low levels.
In the boom, optimism and the search for yield pushed down the risk premia that were built into the
interest rates offered to borrowers, and this may have diluted the effect of any
increases in
policy rates on the ultimate cost of funds.
Those who run the Fed are despondent that despite implementing for eight YEARS an
interest rate policy specifically designed to enable Obama to create a totally false illusion of economic «recovery» by massively
increasing government spending with trillions of phony, deficit, zero -
interest -
rate «dollars,» the people saw through the economic lie and defeated the Fed's next intended puppet, Clinton.
The Fed leaves its benchmark
interest rate steady, but it signaled that an
increase was likely at its next
policy meeting in March.
This
policy not only led to a decline in shorter - maturity
interest rates below zero, but also
increased financial institutions» preferences for holding JGBs, even with super-long-term maturities.
Competition in the provision of housing finance has
increased over the past year, with banks announcing two rounds of cuts in housing
interest rates (in June 1996 and February 1997) independent of any easings in monetary
policy.
Although U.S.
interest rates could stay lower than in previous
rate cycles as Fed
policy very slowly normalizes, investors remain concerned about the impact of
rate increases on their fixed income returns.
At the same time, ruling out any
increase in
interest rates while bond purchases are scaled back, in our view, signals ECB President Mario Draghi's determination to resist any political pressure to speed up the process of normalizing monetary
policy.
After the unexpectedly rapid turnaround in monetary
policy by the Bank of Canada — with July's
increase in Canadian
interest rates coming almost a year earlier than had been widely predicted only a few weeks earlier — the attention of market participants turned to Australia, where
interest rates remained at record lows.
In response to the threat from inflation, which in August of this year reached a 16 - year high, Mexico's central bank sharply tightened monetary
policy,
increasing interest rates at seven consecutive meetings up to June.
Nevertheless, in light of the latest sluggish inflation figures and dovish comments by a number of Fed officials, there was
increased skepticism among many market participants about whether policymakers would go ahead and implement another rise in
interest rates before the end of the year, as indicated by the Fed's projections for monetary
policy.
Powell recognizes the limits of monetary
policy when he notes that «ultimately, the only way to get sustainably higher
interest rates is to improve the broader environment for growth, by adopting
policies designed to
increase productivity and potential output over the long term —
policies that are mainly outside the scope of our work at the Federal Reserve.»
Other
policy - oriented scholars may be
interested in socially engineering more invested fathers with an eye toward enhancing child outcomes, such as
increased high school graduation
rates.
«Our main concern here about these fiscal projections relates to their implications for monetary
policy and, in particular, whether the fiscal stance - which is even looser than was first forecast by the Treasury - contributed to increases in interest rates,» the committee's report The Current State of Monetary Policy s
policy and, in particular, whether the fiscal stance - which is even looser than was first forecast by the Treasury - contributed to
increases in
interest rates,» the committee's report The Current State of Monetary
Policy s
Policy states.
is a weekly topical series hosted by comedian Daniel Tosh that delves into all aspects of the Internet, from the ingenious to the absurd to the Reserve Bank of Australia board member Ian Harper said economic growth isn't strong enough to justify an
interest -
rate increase and
policy makers can do
Policies that raise interest rates can be used to reduce these kinds of spending, while policies that decrease interest rates can be used to increase these kinds of s
Policies that raise
interest rates can be used to reduce these kinds of spending, while
policies that decrease interest rates can be used to increase these kinds of s
policies that decrease
interest rates can be used to
increase these kinds of spending.
In the short run,
increasing federal spending and / or reducing taxes can promote more employment and output, but these
policies also put upward pressure on the price level and
interest rates.
The burden is even more problematic if you consider the country's high
interest rates — the
policy rate was just raised to 12.75 %, one of the highest among major economies — which dramatically
increase the costs of servicing debt.
In recent years, the monetary easing
policy has suppressed
interest rates and
increased the money supply in an effort to promote
increased lending and liquidity.
Excess premium payments result in
increase policy cash value and contribute to
policy stability as
interest rates fluctuate.
The jobs report issued by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics on the first Friday of every month and the Federal Reserve's
policy meetings — which take place every six to eight weeks — can be good indicators as to whether
interest rates will
increase or decrease.
The
policy has a guaranteed 4 %
interest rate, plus life insurance dividends,
increasing your total dividend
rate to 6 or 7 % presently.
As we had seen following the BoJ announcement on September 24, the movement away from signaling ever
increasing amounts of QE and negative
interest rate policy (NIRP) means a better environment for bank stocks, as steeper yield curves imply better margins and higher profits for banks.