Sentences with phrase «policy more than a few years»

Shopping for a more affordable life insurance policy is a good idea, especially if you bought your policy more than a few years ago.

Not exact matches

FOMC members now seem more eager than ever to «normalize» policy, that is raise short term rates into line with historic norms and, to the extent possible, unburden their balance sheet of the huge bond holding they had acquired over the last few years.
Nothing like one underachiever blowing smoke up the ass of another... we know that Ozil has some incredible technical gifts, but to be considered the best you have to bring more than just assists to the table... for me, a top player has to possess a more well - rounded game, which doesn't mean they need to be a beast on both ends of the pitch, but they must have the ability to take their game to another level when it matters most... although he amassed some record - like stats early on, it set the bar too high, so when people expected him to duplicate those numbers each year the pressure seemed to get the best of our soft - spoken star... obviously that's not an excuse for what has happened in the meantime, but it's important to make note of a few things: (1) his best year was a transition year for many of the traditionally dominant teams in the EPL, so that clearly made the numbers appear better than they actually were and (2) Wenger's system, or lack thereof, didn't do him any favours; by playing him out of position and by not acquiring world - class striker and / or right - side forward that would best fit an Ozil - centered offensive scheme certainly hurt his chances to repeat his earlier peformances, (3) the loss of Cazorla, who took a lot of pressure off Ozil in the midfield and was highly efficient when it came to getting him the ball in space, negatively impacted his effectiveness and (4) he likewise missed a good chunk of games and frankly never looked himself when he eventually returned to the field... overall the Ozil experiment has had mixed reviews and rightfully so, but I do have some empathy for the man because he has always carried himself the same way, whether for Real or the German National team, yet he has only suffered any lengthy down periods with Arsenal... to me that goes directly to this club's inability to surround him with the necessary players to succeed, especially for someone who is a pass first type of player; as such, this simply highlights our club's ineffective and antiquated transfer policies... frankly I'm disappointed in both Ozil and our management team for not stepping up when it counted because they had a chance to do something special, but they didn't have it in them... there is no one that better exemplifies our recent history than Ozil, brief moments of greatness undercut by long periods of disappointing play, only made worse by his mopey posturing like a younger slightly less awkward Wenger... what a terribly waste
Picture this, we don't come out of the gate firing on all cylinders, Wenger speaks of how there wasn't enough time for the first - teamers to build chemistry, several key players aren't even playing because of Wenger's utterly ridiculous policy regarding players who played in the Confed Cup or the under21s and the boo - birds have returned in full flight... if these things were to happen, which is quite possible considering the Groundhog Day mentality of this club, how long do you think it will take for Wenger to recant his earlier statements regarding Europa... I would suggest that it's these sorts of comments from Wenger which are often his undoing... why would any manager worth his weight in salt make such a definitive statement before the season has even started... why would any manager who fashions himself an educated man make such pronouncements before even knowing what his starting 11 will be come Friday, let alone on September 1st... why would any manager who has a tenuous relationship with a great many supporters offer up such a potentially contentious talking point considering how many times his own words have come back to bite him in the ass... I think he does this because he doesn't care what you or I think, in fact he's more than slightly infuriated by the very idea of having to answer to the likes of you and me... that might have been acceptable during his formative years in charge, when the fans were rewarded with an scintillating brand of football and success felt like a forgone conclusion, but this new Wenger led team barely resembles that team of ore... whereas in times past we relished a few words from our seemingly cerebral manager, in recent times those words have been replaced by a myriad of excuses, a plethora of infuriating stories about who he could have signed but didn't and what can only be construed as outright fabrications... it's kind of funny that when we want some answers, like during the whole contract debacle of last season, we can't get an intelligent word out of him, but when we just what him to show his managerial acumen through his actions, we can't seem to get him to shut - up... I beg you to prove me wrong Arsene
If a 17 year old ends up having to feature in 70 % of our remaining games I think more than few eyebrows will be raised at our transfer policy.
If this is correct we may hope to expect more pragmatism in fiscal policy over the next few years, rather than allowing a Conservative majority government to spark a determination to reduce the share of government spending and the size of the public sector, regardless of the costs.
In early December, Jeb Bush told an audience of more than 1,000 education reformers in Washington, D.C., that he hoped «there's an earthquake» in the next few years with respect to education funding and policy.
While those policies imploded within a few years, more than 40 states were initially quick to take the deal.
Even with open - admission shelter policies that encourage the public to turn in cats at any time without restriction, few shelters take in more than 10 % of the community's free - roaming cats each year.
Even with open - admission shelter policies that encourage the public to turn in cats at any time without restriction, few shelters take in more than 10 % of the community's free - roaming cats each year [9].
Few areas of travel regulation seem to divide the industry more than airline policies, and this year, the open skies debate was the most divisive issue of all.
In this case, the committee might have discovered more than a few papers by one of them on the subject, such as Risbey and Kandlikar (2002) «Expert Assessment of Uncertainties in Detection and Attribution of Climate Change» in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, or that Prof. Risbey was a faculty member in Granger Morgan's Engineering and Public Policy department at CMU for five years, a place awash in expert elicitation of climate (I sent my abstract to Prof. Morgan — who I know from my AGU uncertainty quantification days — for his opinion before submitting it to the conference).
However, the aggressive embrace of CAGW by the Executive Director and the editors of Chemical and Engineering News have annoyed more than a few members who then dropped out of the ACS, a course of action (leave a scientific society whose policies you can not tolerate) suggested by Prof. Lindzen a few years ago.
(trouble is 35 is for carbon dioxide concentration, and 65 is for forcing, so if that's the calculation it was indeed a typo in a spreadsheet) Actually CO2 as a percentage of all radiative forcing would be: 43/65 * 100 = 66 % You messed up the link (I think) so that it actually leads back to this page rather than the FAQ section http://illconsidered.blogspot.com/2006/02/whats-wrong-with-warm-weather.html Never mind, as you know, I don't think the costs imposed by that change are large, not as long as sea level rise is only 50 cm over a hundred years (and the midpoint for the scenarios I consider most policy relevant, ie those excluding lots of coal burning after 2050, is somewhat lower still) and the change in «weather extremes» largely amounts to nothing more than what would be expected from moving south a few hundred kilometres.
As you can see, lawyers with 10 + years of experience produce far more malpractice claims per policy than lawyers with fewer years of experience.
And just like the example above, when looking at the price tag of a 20 or 30 year term life insurance policy, in some situations, the grandparent will simply elect to take the slightly more expensive cash value whole life insurance option rather than saving a few bucks and choosing a term life insurance policy for their grand kids.
Right now, only a few auto insurance companies have car tracking programs, but at least one study estimates that by the year 2020 more than 25 percent of auto insurance revenue will be generated by car - tracking - related policies.
Term life insurance is also an option over age 60 if you only forsee yourself needing coverage for a limited period of time OR if you need more coverage over the next few years than a burial life insurance policy can provide.
Esurance has received more newcomers due to low policy prices than any other provider in the past few years.
With some of these policies, you could end up paying more in premiums after only a few years than your beneficiaries might ever receive from the death benefit.
These policies still require a bit more legwork than filling out a few forms in the mail, but for thirty years of superior coverage, we think it's worth it.
You can also look for green discounts for hybrid vehicle owners, multi policy discounts for those that need to insure more than one car and loyalty discounts if you have been with the same provider for a few years.
Back then people with AIDS usually didn't last more than a few years and the dirtball, I mean new owner, of the policy could often double their money in very short order.
If your policy has been in force for more than two years, one year in a few states, the policy will pay in full for death due to suicide.
If you have already invested 7 of 10 years in a term policy, it makes more economic sense to maintain the policy for a few more years rather than give up the coverage you have already invested so heavily in having.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z