Under Brown the Treasury acquired the formal responsibility not only to set departmental spending limits, but to secure agreement with ministers as to how the cash would be spent - the first time that the mighty department become formally connected to
policy outcomes across domestic policy.
Not exact matches
Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, without limitation: (1) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including financial market conditions, fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, levels of end market demand in construction and in both the commercial and defense segments of the aerospace industry, levels of air travel, financial condition of commercial airlines, the impact of weather conditions and natural disasters and the financial condition of our customers and suppliers; (2) challenges in the development, production, delivery, support, performance and realization of the anticipated benefits of advanced technologies and new products and services; (3) the scope, nature, impact or timing of acquisition and divestiture or restructuring activity, including the pending acquisition of Rockwell Collins, including among other things integration of acquired businesses into United Technologies» existing businesses and realization of synergies and opportunities for growth and innovation; (4) future timing and levels of indebtedness, including indebtedness expected to be incurred by United Technologies in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition, and capital spending and research and development spending, including in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition; (5) future availability of credit and factors that may affect such availability, including credit market conditions and our capital structure; (6) the timing and scope of future repurchases of United Technologies» common stock, which may be suspended at any time due to various factors, including market conditions and the level of other investing activities and uses of cash, including in connection with the proposed acquisition of Rockwell; (7) delays and disruption in delivery of materials and services from suppliers; (8) company and customer - directed cost reduction efforts and restructuring costs and savings and other consequences thereof; (9) new business and investment opportunities; (10) our ability to realize the intended benefits of organizational changes; (11) the anticipated benefits of diversification and balance of operations
across product lines, regions and industries; (12) the
outcome of legal proceedings, investigations and other contingencies; (13) pension plan assumptions and future contributions; (14) the impact of the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements and labor disputes; (15) the effect of changes in political conditions in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate, including the effect of changes in U.S. trade
policies or the U.K.'s pending withdrawal from the EU, on general market conditions, global trade
policies and currency exchange rates in the near term and beyond; (16) the effect of changes in tax (including U.S. tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which is commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017), environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement is in effect; (21) risks relating to the value of the United Technologies» shares to be issued in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personnel.
• explain current
policy requirements for mainstreaming father - inclusive practice
across all teenage pregnancy and Children's Centre services; • offer guidance on key steps to take to enhance
outcomes for children through developing father - inclusive services; • showcase examples of effective father - inclusive practice in teenage pregnancy and Children's Centre services; • help managers plan their response to this increasingly important
policy agenda.
After the Framework was developed MDH held a series of community meetings
across the state to engage the public in development of
policy recommendations to improve
outcomes and reduce disparities for infants, toddlers, their families, and their communities.
When you know that the
outcome of any piece of careful
policy analysis may be little more than a chip to be run
across the back of a minister's fingers at the poker table, it does rather take the gloss off making sure all the evidence supporting it is just so.
But ultimately, if you want to be methodical about it, you have to look at the
policy record
across a large number of countries over a long stretch of time, comparing
outcomes under PR and majoritarian systems.
Although I am not sure I trusted the BBC under Blair (particularly since the
outcome of the Hutton Report), I do think that the Tories are only now complaining of bias because their poll bubble has burst and they are finding it hard to get their miniscule amounts of genuine
policy across after one of them is caught picking Oleg Deripaska's pockets on a yacht in Corfu.
«Similar alcohol tax increases implemented
across the country could prevent thousands of deaths from car crashes each year,» said Alexander C. Wagenaar, Ph.D., a professor in the department of health
outcomes and
policy at the UF College of Medicine.
The
outcome is a growing corps of
policy - savvy leaders in science and engineering working
across sectors to help address societal challenges and serve the nation and citizens around the world.
«Our findings suggest that unmet nursing care varies widely
across US hospitals and that older blacks disproportionately receive care in settings where care is missed more often,» comments lead author J. Margo Brooks - Carthon, PhD, RN, of University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing's Center for Health
Outcomes and
Policy Research.
[xi] Di Xu and Shanna Jaggars, «Performance Gaps Between Online and Face - to - Face Courses: Differences
Across Types of Students and Academic Subject Areas,» Journal of Higher Education 85 (3), 633 - 659, 2014; Cassandra Hart, Elizabeth Friedmann, and Michael Hill, «Online Course - Taking and Student
Outcomes in California Community Colleges,» Education Finance and
Policy, forthcoming.
Try to think of an education
policy that 1) has been shown, in dozens of studies
across multiple decades, to positively affect student
outcomes; 2) has the overwhelming support of parents and voters; 3) reinforces many other
policies and facilitates quality research; and 4) has been used widely at the district, state, and national levels for decades or more.
Another is to look for consistent patterns in the
outcomes associated with a given
policy across many different nations and time periods.
«
Across the nation, we see first - hand the thoughtful and thorough
policy improvements states are implementing to increase student
outcomes and prepare our children for the next workforce of America,» stated Jeremy Anderson, president of Education Commission of the States.
blended learning California charter Colorado Common Core consortium course choice data Disrupting Class distance learning district EMO Florida full - time funding Georgia higher education Idaho implementation Indiana Iowa Keeping Pace law Louisiana Massachusetts Michigan military mobile learning OER Ohio online learning online learning requirement
policy quality research
outcomes Rhode Island snow day sponsors state virtual schools teacher's role Teaching
across state lines Utah virtual schools VSS 2010 Wisconsin
In sum, and as the remainder of the testimony demonstrates, the lack of evidence on effective
outcomes stemming from neo-voucher programs, over the course of several years and
across states, raises serious questions about moving forward with these
policies, particularly when our most underserved students are placed on the front line of the
policy.
ACER has undertaken an evaluation of ICT in education in Papua province to inform national, provincial and local
policies and curricular strategies aimed at improving the learning
outcomes achieved by basic and secondary education students and adult learners in Papua; and to improve the quality of the teaching and learning using ICT
across the curriculum.
However, there are educational
policies that improve student achievement and adult
outcomes by far larger amounts per dollar spent than
across - the - board spending increases.
The report has three sections: 1) Setting the Context, which discusses the need for effective systems of evaluation and support for school leaders; 2) Sharing Key Lessons Learned, which highlights how states and districts can work together to agree upon and communicate expectations for school leaders and implement standards - based systems of leadership support and evaluation, thereby increasing teacher effectiveness and improving student
outcomes in all schools
across the nation; and 3) Improving Standards Based Leadership Evaluation, which examines leader evaluation as a
policy foundation for identifying, and supporting effective educators.
Across the United States, principals are feeling pressure from
policies intended to accelerate student
outcomes, while at the same time, they're facing demands from the movements toward decentralization and school - based management.
Thankfully, research on which
policies work in other states show us that educational choice programs supported by ALEC members have a record of success
across different measures, from test score increases, to parental satisfaction, to better life
outcomes for students.
This 18 - month, mixed - methods, exploratory study, conducted in partnership with the Consortium for
Policy Research in Education, will have three phases: 1) Qualitative inquiry
across K - 8 schools in Philadelphia; 2) Latent class analysis to identify «profiles» of school disciplinary approaches, coupled with event history analysis to examine student
outcomes in context; 3) Case studies to examine contextual themes in depth.
The variation in union strength identified in recent literature, the new
policy experiments occurring in states
across the country, and the sheer availability of large administrative datasets that link individual students to teachers in school
across the country now allow a new field of highly focused questions that link educational
outcomes to rules, regulations and conditions directly attributable to union efforts.
Across our states, we fight to ensure that the
policies and investments made on state and local levels are focused on improving
outcomes for underserved students.
Policy makers need to be mindful and accommodating of the considerable pressures borne by Indigenous leaders who have to juggle Indigenous and non Indigenous political and professional demands; and immediate and extended family and cultural demands and achieve consensus
outcomes across all areas of their work and life.
In an effort to standardise approaches to
policy implementation in the APS, and ultimately improve policy outcomes, the Australian National Audit Office and the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet have recently produced the Better Practice Guide to the Implementation of Programme and Policy Initiatives — Making Implementation Matter (or the Better Practice Guide).3 Although this publication is a general guide for policy makers across all portfolios — not just in the areas of Indigenous affairs — it represents the collective wisdom and experience of senior managers and executives across th
policy implementation in the APS, and ultimately improve
policy outcomes, the Australian National Audit Office and the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet have recently produced the Better Practice Guide to the Implementation of Programme and Policy Initiatives — Making Implementation Matter (or the Better Practice Guide).3 Although this publication is a general guide for policy makers across all portfolios — not just in the areas of Indigenous affairs — it represents the collective wisdom and experience of senior managers and executives across th
policy outcomes, the Australian National Audit Office and the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet have recently produced the Better Practice Guide to the Implementation of Programme and
Policy Initiatives — Making Implementation Matter (or the Better Practice Guide).3 Although this publication is a general guide for policy makers across all portfolios — not just in the areas of Indigenous affairs — it represents the collective wisdom and experience of senior managers and executives across th
Policy Initiatives — Making Implementation Matter (or the Better Practice Guide).3 Although this publication is a general guide for
policy makers across all portfolios — not just in the areas of Indigenous affairs — it represents the collective wisdom and experience of senior managers and executives across th
policy makers
across all portfolios — not just in the areas of Indigenous affairs — it represents the collective wisdom and experience of senior managers and executives
across the APS.
SWALSC propose that the agreement include ongoing dialogue between a Noongar regional representative entity and the State
across a range of issues of mutual interest, to give effect to sustainable social and economic
outcomes which recognise the interrelationship between native title and the government's broader Indigenous
policy objectives.
This study aims to identify modifiable (potentially amenable to change through
policy) community - level factors that influence children's health and developmental
outcomes in the 25 areas of high and low disadvantage
across Australia.
Addressing inequity in
outcomes for children
across health and education is an issue of timely and significant
policy interest at a state and federal level.68, 69 If right@home is effective and demonstrates benefit, the study design enables replicability at scale, with significant implications for the development of early childhood
policy and strategy throughout Australia and internationally.
The monitoring of child development and well - being over time and
across the whole population enables local communities to determine if they are making improvements and fosters the relative comparison of communities and populations subgroups.19 This commitment to tracking and reporting early childhood
outcomes across the entire population, underlines the federal government's leadership role in providing communities and governments with evidence - based information for
policy and service evaluation.
BPNN consists of parents and organizations who are committed to improving
policies for better
outcomes for children and families with a focus on establishing parent leaders who are willing to share their challenges and successes
across the country to impact change.
Secondly, «attitudes» to
policy are discretionary and depend on the elected government of each jurisdiction, creating uncertainty, unpredictability and inequity in native title
outcomes across Australia.
When governments inadequately invest in quality and
policies even encourage use of poor quality care, poor teaching and care giving may lead to poor developmental
outcomes for children and failure to obtain the potential benefits of quality care
across all domains of development.
Knowing that gaps begin before children enter kindergarten, understanding what children experience as they enter their formal education is vital in order to inform
policies that can improve alignment
across the early learning and K - 12 education systems and ultimately support better
outcomes for all children.
Central to this is the implementation of Better
Outcomes, Brighter Futures, the National
Policy Framework for Children and Young People (2014 - 2020), which requires close collaboration with all stakeholders, effective co-ordination
across Government Departments and clear leadership from the Department of Children and Youth Affairs.
Strategies: Negotiate state government support for capacity building and draft
policy; need to demonstrate achievement of agreed
outcomes to secure on - going funding; encourage relevant government agencies to work with resource agencies in raising management capacity; formulate / implement common CDEP operational
policies and procedures
across region.
With 10 years experience in program implementation and public
policy formation, she has worked with organizations
across the country to secure grant funding through two Federal departments, and helped grantees effectively utilize funds to meet required
outcomes.
ensure a clear coordination of services
across Government departments to enable health and economic development
policies to work together effectively to create more sustainable
outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.