Not exact matches
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control
over financial reporting; 29) the
outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government
policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
The main
outcome of Habitat III was that UN nation states agreed on the New Urban Agenda (NUA): a non-binding document, which will guide
policies over the next 20 years with the goal of making cities safer, resilient and sustainable and their amenities more inclusive.
To illustrate the issue,
over the past 20 years, the cost of a new drug per year of a patient's life has risen from $ 50,000 to $ 250,000 after adjusting for inflation, according to Peter Bach, director of the Center for Health
Policy and
Outcomes at Memorial Sloan Kettering, who also spoke at the conference.
The monetary
policy debate
over whether rule - like behavior is preferable to pure discretion dates back at least to Henry Simons in 1936.1 More recently, in their Nobel Prize - winning work, Finn Kydland and Ed Prescott demonstrated that a credible commitment by policymakers to behave in a systematic rule - like manner leads to better
outcomes than discretion.2 Since then, numerous papers using a variety of models have investigated the benefits of rule - like behavior in monetary
policy and found that there are indeed significant benefits.
I'm always dismayed, for example, by how confidently analyts and economists talk about the relationship between monetary
policy and economic
outcomes, when the fact is that the level of interest rates, changes in interest rates, and changes in the monetary base provide very little additional forecasting power for GDP,
over and above forecasts based on lagged changes in GDP itself.
Given the disappointing growth
outcomes over the first half of 2003,
policy settings in the major economies have become more expansionary.
Overarching any analysis about the impact of Brexit must be a sense of caution about what still remains unknown
over the shape of future
policy outcomes.
If such an
outcome were to occur, however, it would obviously be negative for international confidence in Kenya and lead to extended apathy
over the government's ability to contain graft or execute well - thought - out public
policy.
But ultimately, if you want to be methodical about it, you have to look at the
policy record across a large number of countries
over a long stretch of time, comparing
outcomes under PR and majoritarian systems.
The one
policy that has arguably done more to improve education
outcomes for kids in New York City
over the past decade has been the systematic effort to close the City's giant failing high schools (i.e. drop out factories) and replace them with new, smaller high schools.
A new study entitled «Oral Nutrition Supplements» Impact on Hospital
Outcomes in the Context of Affordable Care Act and New Medicare Reimbursement
Policies» and conducted by leading researchers at the University of Southern California, Stanford University, The Harris School at The University of Chicago and Precision Health Economics, and supported by Abbott, found that the use of oral nutritional supplements decreased the probability of 30 - day hospital readmission, length of stay and costs among hospitalized Medicare patients aged 65 and
over.
Just a few days after Cuomo's announcement, David Deming of Harvard University and Christopher Walters of the University of California at Berkeley presented a new study at the annual meeting of the American Economic Association, using a national database of state funding levels, tuition
policies, institutional expenditures, and student
outcomes over time to ask precisely this question.
Of course,
policy should not turn on the results of any single study, as issues are complex and
outcomes can vary
over time and place.
Indeed this is the biggest driver of the increase in spending
over that period, and spending unrelated to court orders followed this
policy very closely — but
outcomes did not.
The report recommends how states considering such
policies can ensure that high - quality courses reach as many students as possible and how to stage the implementation of Course Access in smart ways
over time to achieve desirable
outcomes for all students.
According to the Coalition for Evidence - Based
Policy, the vast majority of the education experiments that have been conducted
over the past decade have yielded null effects on student
outcomes.
In sum, and as the remainder of the testimony demonstrates, the lack of evidence on effective
outcomes stemming from neo-voucher programs,
over the course of several years and across states, raises serious questions about moving forward with these
policies, particularly when our most underserved students are placed on the front line of the
policy.
Comparative results from the first Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) show that education systems can best support teachers by shifting public and governmental concern away from the mere control
over the resources and content of education toward a focus on
outcomes, by moving from hit - and - miss
policies to targeted interventions, and by moving from a bureaucratic approach to education to devolving responsibilities and effective school leadership that supports teachers through targeted professional development, appraisal, and feedback.
But no matter what the
outcome, this represents a very important step in the growing debate
over education
policy in California,» Dan Schnur, director of the USC Dornsife / Los Angeles Times Poll, told reporters.
With increasing uncertainty about the election
outcome and resulting
policies, markets pushed the trading range lower
over the last two weeks.
With
over 30 years of public sector involvement at every level of government, Secretary Mineta will focus on what works and what does not when industries engage on public
policy, what business messaging lawmakers find persuasive, and how to make a compelling case to achieve favorable government
outcomes.
In contrast, a probability density function
over the equilibrium climate sensitivity conveys no information to a maker of public
policy regarding the
outcomes from his / her
policy decisions.
IMO it's not particularly sensible to frame the entire issue in terms of the small chance of «climate catastrophe» because then we risk having the rug abruptly pulled out from under our
policies when someone proves that the catastrophe is less likely than was previously thought: — RRB - Also, arguing
over the precise threshold probability for particular
outcomes risks turning into angels - on - pins stuff.
Explain how actual
outcomes and sustainability performance for each element of the
policy will be measured and tracked
over time.
While scientists should not be saying: «Here is what your government's climate change
policy should be» they should definitely be saying: «Here are the plausible consequences of the
policy you are pursuing now, and they don't match with the
outcomes you say you want to achieve (like avoiding
over 2 °C of temperature increase)».
While some might consider this to be an unfair
policy outcome that unduly favours occupiers at the expense of consumers, this protection is expressly provided for in the OLA, and there can be little doubt that its specific provisions prevail
over the general scheme of the CPA.
How to avoid dogfights
over project proposals by doing bigger - picture assessments at the strategic level, e.g., by reviewing government plans,
policies and proposals, and then linking strategic, regional and project - level assessment
outcomes.
As set out in National Instrument 62 - 202 Take -
Over Bids — Defensive Tactics, the guiding policy in Canada is that the outcome of a take - over bid should be decided by the shareholders of the issuer, not the board of directors or managem
Over Bids — Defensive Tactics, the guiding
policy in Canada is that the
outcome of a take -
over bid should be decided by the shareholders of the issuer, not the board of directors or managem
over bid should be decided by the shareholders of the issuer, not the board of directors or management.
• Generate sales leads through telephone and email contact and direct them to appropriate sales team members • Respond to inquiries regarding the company's services and products according to company
policy and protocol • Take orders
over the telephone and in person and punch them into the sales system / database • Provide customers with information on the statuses of their orders and inquire into their preferred methods of payment • Assist sales teams in achieving sales
outcomes and goals by providing logistical and administrative support • Provide support in carrying out dedicated sales activities and promotions to help meet sales targets • Organize and make arrangements for sales meetings, conferences and seminars • Create and maintain a clear channel / liaison between sales and production departments • Develop correspondence for both in - house and customer communication purposes • Receive, sort and distribute incoming mail to intended recipients • Create and maintain accurate records of customers and ensure that all records are backed up on a regular basis • Assist administrators in preparing and distributing schedules for staff members and oversee them to ensure that they are performing accordingly
This report seeks to answer two
policy questions: whether providing subsidies to families whose incomes are just
over the state's eligibility limit affects their child care and employment
outcomes, and whether extending the length of time before families must reapply for subsidies affects the receipt of subsidies and related
outcomes.
That is because these gains are not the
outcomes of government
policy or legislation, they are gains deriving from the inherent right of Indigenous people to make decisions in relation to the issues that affect them including decisions
over their land and their resources.
In comparing the birth cohorts from 1958 and 1970 we investigate whether differences in the relationship between indicators of childhood disadvantage and development and adult health
outcomes for these two cohorts are evidential, given the changes in health
policy and provision and in social, demographic and economic conditions in Britain
over the life course of these two birth cohorts.
Government native title
policies of negotiating
over litigating without clear objectives for negotiations miss the opportunity to link to broader Indigenous affairs
policy goals and use native title agreements for more meaningful
outcomes.
The monitoring of child development and well - being
over time and across the whole population enables local communities to determine if they are making improvements and fosters the relative comparison of communities and populations subgroups.19 This commitment to tracking and reporting early childhood
outcomes across the entire population, underlines the federal government's leadership role in providing communities and governments with evidence - based information for
policy and service evaluation.
«Availed of by more than 1,300 families -
over 70 % of the population of newborns - the scale and scope of this service is truly impressive» noted Minister White as he congratulated the HSE, parents, and youngballymun for bringing their roles and resources together in an integrated approach that made the national
policy for children - Brighter
Outcomes, Brighter Futures - a reality in Ballymun.
Now that the new arrangements have been in place for
over 12 months it is critical that steps be taken to ensure that the government «s intended
policy and program goals are properly monitored and
outcomes appropriately evaluated.
The «new reforms» in Indigenous social
policy must include equal, if not greater scrutiny
over the inability of mainstream services to deliver the
outcomes they are funded to deliver in our communities.