Sentences with phrase «policy people like»

Not exact matches

Though this new policy wouldn't affect people like Tyler who had already been sentenced, Holder's announcement gave Tyler renewed hope that his more than 20 - year - long stint in prison would actually end.

People like BMO's Porter and Capital Markets» Madani predict a relatively smooth transition, with the possible successor being senior deputy governor Tiff Macklem, who would likely continue Carney's policy prescriptions.

Moreover, many people have actively pursued us, mentioning the company vibe and values, expressing a desire to work at a place where they are treated like people (and mentioning the policy).

A decorated Harvard economics instructor, a former White House policy adviser, and the author of bestsellers like Market Shock and New Ideas from Dead Economists, Buchholz found himself surrounded by people he deemed to be seeking tawdry material gain at the expense of real quality of life.

If business owners are like investors, healthcare providers, labor union leaders and a myriad of other people with vested interest in our policies, they're probably anxiously awaiting the results to see how their businesses — or sentiment — will fare in 2011.

Microsoft, for example, has reduced itself to heckling Google with two campaigns: «Scroogled,» about the alleged evils of Google's e-mail advertising policy (something that consumers have met with a shrug ever since Gmail's introduction nearly a decade ago); and the «Bing It On Challenge,» in which people on the street pick the search results they like best (which apes the old Pepsi Challenge — a campaign that defined Pepsi by what it isn't, and thus condemned it to being Coke's bridesmaid forever).

That's why statements like, we're «cracking down on abuse... strengthening our policies, and making it easier for people,» as we see in their press release, don't do enough for us.

The PPI report suggested that that policy, and others like it, left people in poor communities with criminal records, setting of a cycle of instability and criminal involvement.

These people are sitting in the same meetings with Trump and other advocates of protectionist policies, like trade adviser Peter Navarro.

But what I liked best about the book is how it engages with what I see as one of the most important and difficult social - policy questions of our time: How do we unstack the deck and, at the same time, get people to take ownership over improving their own lives and communities even when they reasonably believe that the deck is stacked against them?

«Trump campaigned on the negative impacts of trade and trade deals like NAFTA on working Americans, but here instead he is intervening not to help working people but to help American investors and American multinational companies,» Rob Scott, director of trade and manufacturing at the Economic Policy Institute, a left - leaning think tank, told me in an interview in the runup to the investigation announcement.

The following year, Facebook outraged civil liberties groups with a new privacy policy that gave people less control over their what they could do with their data and made sensitive information like profile pictures, locations, and friend lists publicly available.

The Global Times, an influential tabloid published by the ruling Communist Party's official People's Daily, said in an editorial that Trump was «naive like a child on diplomacy» and that the «one China» policy «could not be bought or sold».

Sometimes people ask whether a higher target for inflation might not be better, particularly when inflation is looking like it will rise and the Bank is running a setting of monetary policy designed to resist that.

Shin calls the dynamic between payday lenders and banks «really disturbing,» adding: «It seems like a blanket policy to not help people.»

These technological innovations are an opportunity to do that but an opportunity that comes with a side that needs to be carefully managed by policy - makers, by government like you, where you need to think about the transition period of the people that are working and that are displaced and how you manage that.

He also objected that Democratic proposals to adjust the visa lottery and federal policy for immigrants with temporary protected status were going to drive more people from countries he deemed undesirable into the United States instead of attracting immigrants from places like Norway and Asia, people familiar with the meeting said.

Yet for us to expect that the results of our current innovation policies and investments will miraculously spur new companies and significant economic growth is, as many people like to say, the definition of insanity: doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting a different result.

You just talked about how reluctant some of these negotiators are, but in health policy consistently what you hear people say, and it's Lucy and the football every time, the reason employers ultimately... They may not want to be in the market, just like they may not want to pay high costs, but what they really don't want to do is piss off their employees.

Many people will still think of «Keynesian» fiscal policy as something like that.

We are in a time of utter reverence for great and powerful Oz - like people doing not so great things to the rates of interest that would be paid to savers and prudent people (Zero Interest Rate Policy or ZIRP), and doing wonderful things for leverage (substance) users, speculators and asset owners (MBS and long - term T bond buying).

Nice article list Wiep I left a comment at the «linkbuilding via blog comments» article, I really don't like people promoting blog comments as a link building tool who have a nofollow policy on their own blog...

The Republican bill would hurt protections for people with pre-existing conditions like a history of cancer, said Kirsten Sloan, senior director of policy analysis and legislative support at the American Cancer Society's Cancer Action Network.

«What's been missing is the HR or business response to these disruptions like the adoption of formalized policies regarding remote and flexible work that better support when, where, and how people do their best work,» said Sutton Fell.

While some moves by the networking giant seem to give the signal that it is going out of the way to endear itself to people — like Zuckerberg holding an open Q / A session for the first time, explaining why they made the Facebook messenger a standalone app, making the privacy policy shorter and simpler to understand, others make it more than obvious that they care two hoots for the people who make up the site!

For those who haven't had the time to read the legaled - up language of every single privacy policy we encounter (which, considering Carnegie Mellon researchers estimated it would take the average user the equivalent of 76 work days per year to do, is most of us), and even for people like me who do it for a living and still find disclosure gaps, the Facebook — Cambridge Analytica scandal managed to shed a bit of light on the otherwise obscure relationships between some tech companies and advertisers.

I make fun of the policy shallowness of Romney's convention speech and how he tried to use personal anecdotes to try to get people to like him without giving any real idea of what he would try to do as president.

At least people of faith like Rick Santorum point to the Natural Law as their basis to justify the relationship their faith has with moral public policy.

People like you are so self - deluded that you actually think you understand all about your invisible friend and have authority to pronounce policy.

But is does seem like this policy is being advocated by some reasonable - sounding people with plausible arguments and it does seem to have a respectable intellectual roots.

Presidents and Supreme Court Justices, like Kings and Emperors, want to be obeyed; they want the people, without resistance, to pay their taxes and obey their laws and fight their wars, even where those people supported a different leader or disagree with a particular policy.

I didn't speculate on this in the review, but it did seem that by placing his comments about the sex abuse crisis in that section, he might have been trying to suggest that he had worries, like those worries shared by the late Avery Cardinal Dulles and others, about a one - size - fits - all policy that applies to all those accused of any sort of sexual overtures to people under the age of eighteen.

Acknowledging this, however, would call into question the revelation vouchsafed to another of the new environmentalism's ideological allies, the population - control movement: namely, that people are a pollutant» a pernicious idea, born of the earlier progressivist eugenics movement and brought to a popular boil in the Sixties by evidence - light propagandists like Paul Ehrlich, that continues to affect U.S. foreign - aid policy to this day.

WE do not like a person, not for his policies, plans, etc., BUT because of his / her religion!?

A report by drug policy think tank Volteface stated that 3,700 people died from things like infected syringes and accidental overdoses and recommended a trial of drug consumption rooms to provide a safe, clean and legal space for users.

But I have a huge issue when religion is foisted upon me, it is used to make public policy, and used to inflict injury and death to people who are deemed «unworthy» (like gays or blacks or people who won't go along for the ride).

Groups like Clergy for a New Drug Policy seek to reform the enforcement laws to get to the root of real problems like addiction and poverty, instead of just locking up millions of people, turning them into felons for life.

The nation, like a person, would create its own policies out of its sensitivity to other nations, as well as its own concerns.

I may not like many of Obama's policies and failed promises - actually, I do not and I did not vote for him - but I hold him in very high regard as a man who tends to speak well of other people (yes, he's said some careless things occasionally, but only occasionally), who clearly loves and respects his family, who tries to take the high road in dealings with others.

What I don't get is, being critical of Zionistic policies, agenda or people is quickly labeled as «anti-semitic» and is even considered illegal in countries like Germany, yet a bigoted person like Geert Wilders (who has not once consulted any expect or scholar on Islam) can make a video which literally embodies everything that hate, racism, and ignorance is about, and yet get away with it where the court recognizes it as «denigrating» but not «illegal»!?

If America is to have a stable foreign policy, that policy will start not with looking at the map, but with understanding values (both those of foreign leaders and those of the American people) as they are, and not as we might like them to be.

Trying to FORCE there policies on the rest of the people whether you like it or not.

People attempt to influence government policy on how we deal with issues affecting all of society — including criminals and drugs — based on rule books like the Bible and Koran.

And if we take into account American history — 500 years marred by attempts to eradicate and assimilate people of color — policies like the one at Boston University come close to institutionalized racism.

A report by drug policy think tank Volteface stated that 3,700 people died from things like infected... More

The authors of the report say that people doing federal research on things like income, spending and health should also ask questions about happiness because of the more developed view it could lend to in setting policies to improve people's lives.

The college will deny health care to students and faculty because these people will have a choice whether to use elements of the policy that the school does not like..

Russia is shrinking by 700,000 people a year [like America, Europe and China] so in 23 + years you'll be more than sorry you didn't have the INTELLIGENCE to have a replacement policy in place!

As more Obama policies are implemented such as the UnAffordable Health Tax, the will be more and more poor people without health - care, food, jobs, housing — like Detroit.

«This misguided policy of treating hemp like it's some kind of perilous threat to the American people is a mistake, and it means that hemp products that are lining up on store shelves across America simply will not be American made.»