Sentences with phrase «policy problems clearly»

have the ability to recognize and to define legal and public policy problems clearly, and to contextualize and view them from multiple perspectives;

Not exact matches

«There's clearly a growing awareness of these problems in the technical community,» says Solon Barocas, an assistant professor at Cornell who studies ethical and policy issues related to artificial intelligence.

Franklin may allow himself a few more slips or a little less guilt about the slips than Mather did but what Lawrence called the «barbed - wire of shalt - not ideals» is still up.10 Though now we can not tell for sure whether virtue is pursued for its own good or for the public seeming of good («Honesty is the best policy» clearly illustrates the problem) the impulse life is still tightly reined in.

Crisis books usually follow a predictable pattern: first a searing depiction of the problem at hand, then some broad and sweeping assessments of how great changes in attitude might begin to address the issue, and then some piddling and timid policy proposals that clearly won't begin to meet the challenge.

Nation states were clearly unable to solve certain problems on their own and therefore an effective European policy could count on what Eurocrats used to call a «permissive public consensus.»

In a city full of policy wonks and experts, we need to respect how Kony 2012 humanized the issue's problem, with a simple target: a person who is clearly bad.

Despite the roadblocks, those shaping science policy and those working at the bench clearly recognize the problems with China's current research culture: It wastes resources, corrupts the spirit, and stymies innovation.

The policies and organization that Jim Stowers initiated clearly go against all the serious problems for science at universities.

After all if the «science» of AGW were still, so to speak, «unsettled» then clearly it would be madness, not to say despicably irresponsible, of organisations like the Royal Society to urge policy prescriptions in order to deal with a problem which may actually not even exist.

Well, clearly, YOU don't, but politicians and policy makers have advisers who do — and as you say, the problem was well known.

And even when it doesn't, sometimes only judges can see problems of policy or morality clearly, and may be uniquely positioned to raise awareness of problems that society ought to address.

The Court recognized that the problem is far worse when the boundaries of the state - granted monopoly are not «clearly articulated and affirmatively expressed as state policy,» and the professionals are given the power to decide what is the «unauthorized practice» of their profession...

We reject the claim, advanced by Price Waterhouse here and by the dissenting judge below, that the District Court clearly erred in finding that Beyer was «responsible for telling [Hopkins] what problems the Policy Board had identified with her candidacy.»

Many of your problems are ones that seem to be caused by not reading the fine print — the company clearly states what is and is not covered under their policy.