Strong protections for the right to protest are essential to meaningful and informed
political debate and discussion.
«Providing more live coverage of the key
political debates and discussions has meant that during 2015, a dramatic year in politics, we've seen a surge in people using BBC Parliament to follow proceedings.
Not exact matches
Recent confusion at the
political level
and a philosophical
discussion with some friends has prompted a revisit to the taxi
debate.
But the charge puts me in mind of the colloquium
discussion in the January issue of First Things which treated the
debate between so - called «liberal»
and «radical» Catholics, perhaps because my contribution to that
discussion has elicited similar accusations of
political irresponsibility or moral cowardice from people sympathetic to the liberal line of thought.
You
and Sam are the ones who turned the
discussion into a
debate over the quality of the observable
and verifiable evidentiary sociological implications of generalized
political affiliation in relation to spiritual
and cognitive self identification.
Campaign finance reform will not itself make the
political process a full
and free
discussion and debate.
I also think it appropriate for them to cite those reasons in public
discussions and debates about those
political issues.
Martin Kettle of The Guardian who was a respondent to Gary said that he had not yet read the PES manifesto, but that the
discussion would make him to do so,
and that he certainly favoured a more
political debate in Europe.
The Politics in Spires blog series «A Separate or United Kingdom» has attempted to contribute to an expanded
discussion of the independence
debate with voices from across the social sciences, including law, economics, sociology, psychology, human geography,
political philosophy,
and more.
Political disagreement still remains in Kenya on whether suspected perpetrators of the post-election violence should have been tried under a local tribunal or the ICC,
and Kenyatta
and Ruto have spun this ongoing
discussion into a
debate over whether others believe them to be guilty or not.
«Too often
debates about AV are less like
political arguments,
and more like scientific
discussions, where people get lost in a language of proportionality
and preferences, probabilities
and possibilities.
Cults, then, tend to close down more detailed or complex
discussion, reducing
political debate to content free slogans
and faith in the qualities, real or imagined, of leading individuals.
It is certainly worthwhile staying tuned for future
debates and discussions, which aim to «look at the underlying questions that face us in the
political sphere».
This hierarchy is often reflected in
political priorities,
and one current
debate where this may be seen is the
discussion over prioritising house building over the protection of the countryside.
A deadly, ISIS - inspired attack that came just a week ahead of the New York City mayoral election turned a
political debate into a fiery
discussion over the city's approach to terrorism
and policing.
America's
Debate - News, Government &
Political Debate «A free
and easy - to - use
discussion forum for
debating serious issues seriously.
Debates between isolationism
and intervention abound throughout the film, as do
discussions about the treatment of people of color, such as the
political agenda of Killmonger that is closely tied to racial inequality.
I was recently introduced to FORA.tv, a new Web site that aggregates videos of
discussions and debates on interesting
political, social,
and cultural issues.
Programme highlights From early years practice to high - level
debates on the provision of music education for all, the programme aimed to provide a balance of practical, advice - led sessions, useful practice - sharing workshops
and discussion to broaden thinking both on practice
and the broader
political context of musical
and cultural education.
The
political screech of today's overheated K — 12
debate drowns out
discussion of plodding, bipartisan measures,
and our infatuation with shiny new initiatives — Blended learning!
Supporters rushed the standards» adoption, used whatever
political channels were most convenient, eschewed public
debate and discussion,
and in doing so triggered a massive backlash that either caused states to reject the standards outright or led them to water down the initiative to such an extent that there's little left of the original vision, which called for the careful alignment of standards, tests, curricular resources,
and teaching strategies, all to be shared across state borders.
Perhaps the Superintendent missed the college class when students were taught that
political debate is the
discussion of policy options
and, in this case, the role of the Board of Education to make appropriate policy decisions as the formal legislative body of Hartford's school system.
Remember, I'd lived
and breathed politics my entire life — had
political discussion and debate served like mashed potatoes with dinner every night since I was a little kid.
It was The Club that provided the informal yet critical format for panel
discussions which included various topics: painting, sculpture, philosophy, music, anthropology,
and on some occasions even heated
political debates.
Although many over emphasize the social aspects of such an event, I found the most stimulating conversations I've had in years happening in the auditorium tent where borders —
political, spatial, ideological
and imagined — were
debated and stretched to their limits through heady
discussion from artists
and the public alike.
Three themes are emerging from the newly released emails: (1) prominent scientists central to the global warming
debate are taking measures to conceal rather than disseminate underlying data
and discussions; (2) these scientists view global warming as a
political «cause» rather than a balanced scientific inquiry
and (3) many of these scientists frankly admit to each other that much of the science is weak
and dependent on deliberate manipulation of facts
and data.
The seven month delay, sources within the government say, came after
discussions late last spring between Health
and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sibelius» office
and officials linked to Valerie Jarrett at the Executive Office, who were
debating the
political implications of approving the GM salmon.
The Weekend Australian lead editorial on «Global warming facts must give us all pause to think» references Judith's work
and concludes after considering the pause that «The gatekeepers of scientific media
and political debate should not be afraid of a
discussion about the facts
and their ramifications.
But AGW probably doesn't exist,
and if it does, it's effects in 50 years are utterly unknowable, so no rational
discussion is possible, so
political debate is non-existent,
and those who propose it are demonised as deniers.
The Dunlap / Brulle book acknowledges that the dominant scientific
and economic discourses framing the climate
debate «reinforces the existing socio - politico - economic status quo»
and «removes moral
and political considerations from the
discussion» (Brulle.
In public
discussion, scientific publications,
political debate and economic analysis alike, climate engineering is always presented in a certain way which alleviates the importance of some aspects of it
and neglects others — climate engineering is framed.
Very few politicians supporting any meaningful legislation on climate change, limited
discussion in the Press
and political debates, projections for increasing fossil fuel use as far out as the eye can see, etc..»
Given the often invoked rationale underlying the use of the living tree metaphor, it is ironic indeed that in constitutionalizing these
political and social issues, the courts have «frozen» those issues in time,
and thereby immunized those issues from future
and evolving civic engagement,
discussion and debate.
As late as 1975, the British Columbia Court of Appeal could state with confidence that, unlike the United States, Canadian courts were concerned solely with the text of a statute
and were not permitted to reference «things said in
debates,» or engage in «a philosophical
and political discussion that extends progressively beyond the ordinary meaning of the words.»
Perhaps it ill - behooves a lawyer
and law professor to say so, but I think this is a dangerous mistake, especially when this kind of approach to argument increasingly emigrates from the courts
and colonizes public
and political discussion and debate.
Weekly KCRW's
political podcast emulates the classic
debate setup: someone on the left, someone on the right,
and someone in the center to moderate the
discussion.
As regular readers of this blog now, there is an on - going
debate about balancing Social Emotional Learning interventions with ensuring that these practices don't act as a replacement for needed economic, social
and political policy changes (see The Best Resources Showing Social Emotional Learning Isn't Enough
and, in particular, my Washington Post piece, The Manipulation of Social Emotional Learning, to learn more about this
discussion).